Three phases bounty distribution - page 2.

Anonylz

hero member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 577

Quote from: ije07 on July 20, 2020, 01:17:37 PM

yes, maybe that is one way to minimize the price of a project coin itself, if the tokens are distributed in three stages I think this is good. if it's not wrong like the tokoin project, they do the same thing as this and in fact can maintain the value of the project's own coin.

It is good if the price of token is maintained, with this process it will look as if the participants are receiving monthly salary for a work done, the idea is not bad only the problem of future uncertainty, especially with the price going lower and there is a possibility of team not fulfilling their promise, if this happens, the participants will be at loss.

Shef198911

member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 60

Bounty Campaign Manager

Quote from: Apostlekin$$$ on July 16, 2020, 05:45:27 AM

It's a good thing that few bounty managers are now limiting participants for bounties but another problem I'm bounty projects are dumps, one way that bounty managers can help to avoid dump is three phase distribution, many would probably hate this but c'mon we all want good $$$ from projects we promoted right? Controlling dump this way works, what do you think? I've seen bubbalex doing this and even COVIR that plan to use bitforex to raise funds plan to distribute tokens in three phases

this idea is already used by almost every BM, even not 3 phases, but sometimes they divide it for 3-4 months, and one company divided the payments for a year ahead, and in the end what happened ? all your reward is divided, and a month goes for 2-3 $, super idea ! already there are no those companies when went on 1000 -2000 $ after listing, now if there will be 20-30$ for kakue the company, it is already good, and you offer them still to divide into 3 phases

mdzahed134

sr. member

Activity: 2226

Merit: 259

Buzz App - Spin wheel, farm rewards

Quote from: Akiko on July 21, 2020, 06:12:21 AM

Quote from: sayam on July 20, 2020, 10:51:30 AM

I don't like being made a participant limited. It cannot save the project from being dumped. One of the things that need to be done to save the project from dumping is slow distribution. So I agree with you on this point.

if more participants join in a campaign because it doesn't have a limit you as bounty participants will only receive little rewards is that what you want to happen?

Limiting participants is actually help to receive every one exact amount of payment from the job done.

Limited participants can be play very important role, firstly bounty hunters rewards will be reduce for the due to massive participation so that payment will too small. BM can easily filter those are fake entries on the spreadsheet. Now actually i see participants limitation on the bubbalex campaigns.

pealr12

hero member

Activity: 1946

Merit: 502

Quote from: the_thing on July 16, 2020, 06:06:53 AM

Quote from: Apostlekin$$$ on July 16, 2020, 05:45:27 AM

It's a good thing that few bounty managers are now limiting participants for bounties but another problem I'm bounty projects are dumps, one way that bounty managers can help to avoid dump is three phase distribution, many would probably hate this but c'mon we all want good $$$ from projects we promoted right? Controlling dump this way works, what do you think? I've seen bubbalex doing this and even COVIR that plan to use bitforex to raise funds plan to distribute tokens in three phases

I have seen many project owners already implementing this. It's a good way to control the dump caused by bounty distribution but, I think it's not up to bounty managers to decide how they wanna distribute the token because it's usually project owners who send out the payments to participants.

do you think bounty hunters can cause dump? I think no because only 1% of the total tokens is for the bounty participants. What i dont like is there is three phases of bounty distribution, what if a bounty participant will only get 20$ he will only get 6.6$on the first phase.

inanilujimi

sr. member

Activity: 1876

Merit: 259

This is common for projects that don't have confidence when they enter the market.
it's ironic indeed as if the bounty hunter does not deserve what should be his.
I think projects like this will gradually become the next trash.

Fredomago

legendary

Activity: 2996

Merit: 1054

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: mdzahed134 on July 24, 2020, 03:28:30 PM

Quote from: sayam on July 20, 2020, 10:51:30 AM

I don't like being made a participant limited. It cannot save the project from being dumped. One of the things that need to be done to save the project from dumping is slow distribution. So I agree with you on this point.

Limitation must be need specially for small allocation campaigns. Now mostly long campaign but very low budget, so if here no limitation you can't expect good rewards. Legit project never crash after hunters tokens distribution.

That last statement is for real, legit project won't allow to crashed their coin once the hunters start to dumped their rewards, theirs plan ahead
and expectations not to really harmed the value of their coin. Small drop might be experienced but it surely recover back.

mdzahed134

sr. member

Activity: 2226

Merit: 259

Buzz App - Spin wheel, farm rewards

Quote from: sayam on July 20, 2020, 10:51:30 AM

I don't like being made a participant limited. It cannot save the project from being dumped. One of the things that need to be done to save the project from dumping is slow distribution. So I agree with you on this point.

Limitation must be need specially for small allocation campaigns. Now mostly long campaign but very low budget, so if here no limitation you can't expect good rewards. Legit project never crash after hunters tokens distribution. Dumping is not happened from bounty participants.

mandor

sr. member

Activity: 1638

Merit: 260

Trphy.io

Quote from: Apostlekin$$$ on July 16, 2020, 05:45:27 AM

It's a good thing that few bounty managers are now limiting participants for bounties but another problem I'm bounty projects are dumps, one way that bounty managers can help to avoid dump is three phase distribution, many would probably hate this but c'mon we all want good $$$ from projects we promoted right? Controlling dump this way works, what do you think? I've seen bubbalex doing this and even COVIR that plan to use bitforex to raise funds plan to distribute tokens in three phases

there may be some bounty hunters who like the method of distribution like that and maybe there are many who do not like the rules like that. indeed the purpose of the rule is to avoid dumping but the payment received is not full or even waiting, it is too painful because it is the right of the prize hunter if they want to sell fast or long. honest, I personally do not like such distribution.

Distinctin

hero member

Activity: 2926

Merit: 657

No dream is too big and no dreamer is too small

Quote from: AthenaBanana on July 23, 2020, 12:43:41 PM

Quote from: Apostlekin$$$ on July 16, 2020, 05:45:27 AM

It's a good thing that few bounty managers are now limiting participants for bounties but another problem I'm bounty projects are dumps, one way that bounty managers can help to avoid dump is three phase distribution, many would probably hate this but c'mon we all want good $$$ from projects we promoted right? Controlling dump this way works, what do you think? I've seen bubbalex doing this and even COVIR that plan to use bitforex to raise funds plan to distribute tokens in three phases

I think dump is still base on the quality of the project if the project has a promising future investors will be eager to buy more than to sell more

Exactly, but sometimes you can't see the quality of the project in the early stage, actually people are more attached with their emotion so when there is a hype or FUD, they act very fast without analyzing carefully before making a decision.

AthenaBanana

copper member

Activity: 392

Merit: 1

Quote from: Apostlekin$$$ on July 16, 2020, 05:45:27 AM

It's a good thing that few bounty managers are now limiting participants for bounties but another problem I'm bounty projects are dumps, one way that bounty managers can help to avoid dump is three phase distribution, many would probably hate this but c'mon we all want good $$$ from projects we promoted right? Controlling dump this way works, what do you think? I've seen bubbalex doing this and even COVIR that plan to use bitforex to raise funds plan to distribute tokens in three phases

I think dump is still base on the quality of the project if the project has a promising future investors will be eager to buy more than to sell more

Bitstar_coin

hero member

Activity: 2478

Merit: 695

SecureShift.io | Crypto-Exchange

This type of distribution will be more satisfying if the project is able to maintain a good price throughout the distribution phase, distribution from phase 1 can be good because at this point the price is still very okey, but before it get to phase 3 the price of the token must have dump alot and this is not very favorable to hunters,
I understand this type of distribution is to control price from dumping but in most cases price still dump even without distribution, this is only beneficial to project team and not to hunters.

rozak

sr. member

Activity: 1960

Merit: 273

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Quote from: amos77978 on July 16, 2020, 05:54:31 AM

Quote from: Apostlekin$$$ on July 16, 2020, 05:45:27 AM

It's a good thing that few bounty managers are now limiting participants for bounties but another problem I'm bounty projects are dumps, one way that bounty managers can help to avoid dump is three phase distribution, many would probably hate this but c'mon we all want good $$$ from projects we promoted right? Controlling dump this way works, what do you think? I've seen bubbalex doing this and even COVIR that plan to use bitforex to raise funds plan to distribute tokens in three phases

whether 1 phase or 10 phase of bounty distribution.. a listed coin without good demand and market makers to drive volume will always go down to zero.. people who invest in crypto startup are those who likes to gamble with their hard earned money

true some people who dare to invest are those who bet on the profits they believe no matter how many times the phase is done it will go down if the project is honest right, but before they will bet I'm sure they have assumed in advance for what they are betting and sure you will get a reciprocal that is profitable even though you can't be sure of the end result

stomachgrowls

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 794

Quote from: Apostlekin$$$ on July 16, 2020, 05:45:27 AM

It's a good thing that few bounty managers are now limiting participants for bounties but another problem I'm bounty projects are dumps, one way that bounty managers can help to avoid dump is three phase distribution, many would probably hate this but c'mon we all want good $$$ from projects we promoted right? Controlling dump this way works, what do you think? I've seen bubbalex doing this and even COVIR that plan to use bitforex to raise funds plan to distribute tokens in three phases

Its useless because bounty hunters arent the real dumpers in the first place.So having this kind of set-up wont work because dumps would be inevitable because the main dumpers are the investors itself.

Just imagine on how much percentage of tokens are allocated for marketing or bounty? Most of the time it would be only 1-2% and if you do try to calculate then you will surely realize

that it isnt really that a big thing.This is why when tokens get listed then expect for huge dumps yet investor would secure out profits as early as they can.

Akiko

full member

Activity: 896

Merit: 198

Quote from: sayam on July 20, 2020, 10:51:30 AM

I don't like being made a participant limited. It cannot save the project from being dumped. One of the things that need to be done to save the project from dumping is slow distribution. So I agree with you on this point.

if more participants join in a campaign because it doesn't have a limit you as bounty participants will only receive little rewards is that what you want to happen?

Limiting participants is actually help to receive every one exact amount of payment from the job done.

Cocoincos

member

Activity: 700

Merit: 12

on my opinion if project strong and good and quality it cant be dumped, I think that salary need to pay after work, and better to do it in stable coins, thats all!

mulia sabee

full member

Activity: 910

Merit: 102

Quote from: Apostlekin$$$ on July 16, 2020, 05:45:27 AM

It's a good thing that few bounty managers are now limiting participants for bounties but another problem I'm bounty projects are dumps, one way that bounty managers can help to avoid dump is three phase distribution, many would probably hate this but c'mon we all want good $$$ from projects we promoted right? Controlling dump this way works, what do you think? I've seen bubbalex doing this and even COVIR that plan to use bitforex to raise funds plan to distribute tokens in three phases

in my opinion the fall in the price of coins in the market is not influenced by bounty participants because the allocation of coins given to all bounty participants is only 1 to 3% of the total 100% of the number of coins launched. so I strongly disagree if the cause of the dump occurs due to bounty participants. then it is not important to do the distribution in stages.

ije07

sr. member

Activity: 1435

Merit: 250

PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market

yes, maybe that is one way to minimize the price of a project coin itself, if the tokens are distributed in three stages I think this is good. if it's not wrong like the tokoin project, they do the same thing as this and in fact can maintain the value of the project's own coin.

Zazzu

sr. member

Activity: 518

Merit: 256

Living the truth....

Quote from: sayam on July 20, 2020, 10:51:30 AM

I don't like being made a participant limited. It cannot save the project from being dumped. One of the things that need to be done to save the project from dumping is slow distribution. So I agree with you on this point.

Without limiting participants, you will only receive a few cents for your entire job, and do you think it is worth it?

Almasani

full member

Activity: 854

Merit: 102

Quote from: Apostlekin$$$ on July 16, 2020, 05:45:27 AM

It's a good thing that few bounty managers are now limiting participants for bounties but another problem I'm bounty projects are dumps, one way that bounty managers can help to avoid dump is three phase distribution, many would probably hate this but c'mon we all want good $$$ from projects we promoted right? Controlling dump this way works, what do you think? I've seen bubbalex doing this and even COVIR that plan to use bitforex to raise funds plan to distribute tokens in three phases

Lol ...
I think the dump does not only lie in the concept of distribution. Have you seen how the IMO project did? They are not even distributing in three phases. However, the distribution period takes one year. We can generate tokens from the wallet like mining results. There are certain limitations that we get every day. But the result is a token dump that reaches the deepest layers of the earth.
Let's rationalize what is happening.
Token dump due to loss of marketing concepts.
List their projects in the popular exchange, and deliver a real implementation of the concepts they have developed.
Too long-winded makes people lose confidence. This will make people leave the project.

Quote from: sayam on July 20, 2020, 10:51:30 AM

One of the things that need to be done to save the project from dumping is slow distribution.

If the distribution period arrives, will the dump not occur? This is called running away from problems, not solving problems.

sayam

jr. member

Activity: 1442

Merit: 2

I don't like being made a participant limited. It cannot save the project from being dumped. One of the things that need to be done to save the project from dumping is slow distribution. So I agree with you on this point.

Topic: Three phases bounty distribution - page 2. (Read 834 times)