why call them top if they are not the best ? and what do you think is the reason why they are among the top 20 spot ?
Oh come on, are you really looking into the market? Do you know some ICO ratings doesn't give any quality ratings? Some of them are being paid. Most of the assets in the TOP 20 claim its position because of the hype, then what happens when the hype is gone? the project dies. I'll ask you again, what do you think is the reason why are they on the top 20? man, you didn't really get the point.
investing or putting your fund in each of them is a good idea when compare to investing on unrated coins because you can be sure that you can recover your capital . its also normal that they dont have a stable value because crypto is really known to be unstable due to the effects of thier volatility feature . time of investment will varry depending on the investor . some will wait for the dip while some will buy and hodl .
I can't really understand your point, please construct your statement in a good way and fix your grammar first.
It's the thing when someone only knows how to hunt bounties (lmao), that's why I'm saying you should invest to the first 5 (first quarter of the top 20) because when it comes to stability, it's constant. I know the market is not very stable now
but there's a specific platforms/projects that have the ability to control their coin without considering the market. Did you really get my point or you just wanted to drop some out of context statements just to have a post?
Bitvest does really consider that kind of posting? hmm.