few points for people to think about
1. there are now millions of bitcoiners.. but only hundred(s) attend conferences so technically there is already a 99% boycott
2. again CSW doesnt get rich from conferences. its just used as his acting stage like a karaoke night. people turn up just to see the act
3. initial revelations before CSW changed his story, was that CSW creatd a txt file of public keys and got dave K to validate that the public keys held value, then dave K notarised his observations. initial revelations were not that dave k mined bitcoin and put them into a trust that then CSW hid away. but that dave K simply notarised some public keys
4.going through all the different stories and changes csw has attempted. i simply believe that CSW hired Ira K to file a suit, not to get CSW into trouble, but to secretly work together to try to get a judge to claim that atleast one of them by law owns 1m btc hoping a judge wouldnt ask for proof butjust judge ira or csw as the legal owner. thus (foolishly) making the trust look legal and valid to use the verdict to quash csw legal battle with aussie government(separate case)
anyways. CSW cant prove ownership of say 200,000 addresses of 50btc (the original 'i own tulip trust of satoshi's coins)
anyways. CSW cant prove ownership of say less addresses of thousands of btc (the more recent 'i own tulip trust' of mtgox coins)
so things wont go well for csw...... as long as the court case actually goes through with demanding proof of signature of addresses.. rather than just say ira owns (fake trust) if csw cant prove it
If I remember correctly they had did some shitty suit previously with the aforementioned public addresses that have been proven false. I think you are definitely on to this being a fake lawsuit to 1, get craig out of legal shit with the AUS and secondly to bolster his false claims.1. there are now millions of bitcoiners.. but only hundred(s) attend conferences so technically there is already a 99% boycott
2. again CSW doesnt get rich from conferences. its just used as his acting stage like a karaoke night. people turn up just to see the act
3. initial revelations before CSW changed his story, was that CSW creatd a txt file of public keys and got dave K to validate that the public keys held value, then dave K notarised his observations. initial revelations were not that dave k mined bitcoin and put them into a trust that then CSW hid away. but that dave K simply notarised some public keys
4.going through all the different stories and changes csw has attempted. i simply believe that CSW hired Ira K to file a suit, not to get CSW into trouble, but to secretly work together to try to get a judge to claim that atleast one of them by law owns 1m btc hoping a judge wouldnt ask for proof butjust judge ira or csw as the legal owner. thus (foolishly) making the trust look legal and valid to use the verdict to quash csw legal battle with aussie government(separate case)
anyways. CSW cant prove ownership of say 200,000 addresses of 50btc (the original 'i own tulip trust of satoshi's coins)
anyways. CSW cant prove ownership of say less addresses of thousands of btc (the more recent 'i own tulip trust' of mtgox coins)
so things wont go well for csw...... as long as the court case actually goes through with demanding proof of signature of addresses.. rather than just say ira owns (fake trust) if csw cant prove it
I again hold my views that a tulip trust makes no sense of a coin that was an experiment and never expected to worth any true value.
