Topic: Timelord2067 com DO NOT TRUST proven trust abusing untrustworthy scumbag. (Read 756 times)

The member timelord2067

11 march red trust abuse. I will discuss it.

Seem to have given this account a red tag under false and incorrect pretense?
Speculating on several different origin of alt demonstrate no clear idea.
Doxing? False claim
Jumping to red trust based on made up nonsense? I don't notice any red tag on lauda for proof of scam though?
Why red tags on weak speculation and lies? No red tag for proof of deception and lies for direct financial gain = scam?

The sign of an untrustworthy member is they refuse to provide robust foundation for their actions.
Why some members including the member timelord2067 in their default trust list?

The member seems to specialize in diluting the value of the trust system.
I have noted this after many years is avatar and sig spamming?

I wish for timelord2067 to come and debste the validity of his recent use of tagging.
I will remain as always open minded,  objective and patient.
Come on timey don't be shy, i wish to review the doxing i have been engaging in.
I hope thos this deranged approach to tagging can be treated by my council

I see some including timelord2067 but still they tell timelord2067 judgement dubious.

sorry that you are too stupid to realise those 2 statements you quoted are not related. Hence why there are many other sentences in between them. I am not replying to myself as you said.

Now, if you are also too dumb to locate a thread when I tell you the sub board thread title and inform you that there is a search function that is your problem.

I supply all of that and still you supply ZERO

Absolutely not.
Pointing your contradictions ; the fact that you expect everything you ask for delivered to you on a plate while you "await" but when we ask you to do the same, you go "meh search function".

Just trying to help a fool like you see the error of your corrupt and untrustworthy ways.

cherry picking quotes to take it out of context and suit your agenda.... looks kinda untrustworthy to me.


Fair enough search for yourself.

tick tock

That's even better.
You now started to reply to your own interrogations !

Lol please present evidence for these false allegations?? I await.

I will not accept red trust from trust abusing scum.

A matter of time for what?  

I asked to produce debates that I lost. Perhaps you were confused. I proved clearly merit is cycled, system of control are wide open to motivated abuse.

I just pointed you to search for the most important thread of the year in meta. What can't use the search function now ?

Now actually I hear others independent of my own experiences stating you are involved with lauda, tman and owlcatz.

This is not at all good -- for you.

You are a trust abuser and therefore untrustworthy. It is there in black and white.

I see dire poster wolf boy arrived. Go to meta to visit our last conversation. Another dumb shit who makes false allegations/statements he can not provide evidence to substantiate because it simply does not exist.

And this is why the ignore feature is useless.  Feeding trolls makes the whole world dumber, but it can be hilarious.

It doesn't exist just like his abilities to think rationally. You're right, I came for a serious discussion but leaving with giggles.

Deviant, maybe, in my best days. 

Devious ? Nah that is you being devious, targeting random users, blackmailing other users, and making a fuss for more than a month now.
You should get over it, you're only wasting you time. It's only a matter of time anyway ... so please keep entertaining us.
Nothing better than a bit of cryptohunter nonsense before going to bed. That for sure helps to nosedive.

I found none of the so many "debates" you have "won", by the way. 

Is this yogg escrow untrustworthy scumbag back here rearing its untrustworthy and devious head?

Yeah, get to meta and look up most important thread of the year. We can continue the debate there.

Or pick a merit cycling thread there I started and continue there.

@phatass

is that OKAY you will remove your sig??

Good , get on with it then sig spamming shit poster.

Wait there's a debate somewhere ?

Fuck you are stupid. "They" are trusted by who? the same corrupt self serving scum I want removed. Your arguments have zero foundation except that you say it has foundation. Where as I can PROVE they are liars and self confessed trust abusers. Not to mention implicated in extortion schemes and other such dirty deeds. Supported by dumb asskissers like you and other sock puppet racist shilling sig spammers who also like yourself care to lecture others on financially motivated posting.

Nobody cares about my existence ... boo hoo.... please fool get back to licking ass your insults are more like praise to me. This is the kind of comment I thrive on. In the "town" of meta the most rotten shit hole on this entire board.

"they " (presumably your masters who you ass kiss constantly)  can call me what they like, they have never beaten me in one debate. Provide evidence if you believe that they have. I have demonstrated they are self serving merit cycling trust abusing liars and scum.

Stop ass kissing, stop being a moron, stop spamming your sig whilst pumping out net negative garbled nonsense.

Get back to the swamp sig spamming ass kisser.

Remove your sig and post because you are an enthusiast for this forum not a paid per post shit poster.

Will you remove that gambling sig or not?? yes or no? are you just here to post for bucks or will you post because you support this forum??

Coincidently, it's coming from multiple trusted users on the forum. Who's imbecile again? Stop making an ass out of yourself.

Like whatever the case is, not a single person gives a fuck about your existence on this forum. They call you a famous retard in the town. Face it.

Isn't it nice that you get paid to have stupid arguments with the bubble-headed idiots? Nevermind, I just came here to prove TL's website is not injecting any viruses as your illiterate ass put it. Apart from that, I've zero interest in your opinions regarding anything. A friendly advice, make sure you don't run out of the pills.

That "fallacy" however apparently is the foundation for my red trust imbecile.


Moron you get more stupid. I am telling you that I do not believe the DT system functions correctly since they are provably open to selfish abuse and therefore all trust ratings (based on clear abuse) are null and void. Then you come and try to use that score as the foundation for another stupid statement about my reputation. My post history is my reputation.


Now get back to feltching for merits and some trust position to abuse.

Yes you will be added to the untrustworthy list. Since I see now clearly that you will support untrustworthy actions of trust abuse.

Go ask him to clarify then because I am sure he does not mean red trust should be given for presenting facts and reasonable opinions based on observable events and facts.

You are clearly using this thread to asskiss and spam you gambling sig everywhere. Net negative financially motivated shit posting is rife here by people like yourself.

Remove your gambling  sig before posting in my thread further I do not wish this thread used as an excuse for financially motivated net negative shit posting idiots.

That is what we call a damn fallacy! A slippery slope to be precise..

There was no logic involved in any of my statements lol

But you don't have any reputation lol Like your account is in negatives already. How one more negative changes any of it?

You're free to 'untrust' me lol

He literally never said that.

So another proven untrustworthy scumbag yogg turns up to defend another proven untrustworthy trust abusing scum bag. Obviously I appreciate the bump.

Provide some evidence for the lies that you mention or it is evident that you are now a liar also.

It is quite simple

Theymos has said that the trust system ie red trust is for scammers and those directly related to scams only.

You Yogg and timelord2067 have willfully chosen to abuse your positions of trust to incorrectly and unjustly label my account untrustworthy for actually telling the truth about your pals. That is untrustworthy and actually a total perversion of what the trust system is meant for. Therefore if you are willing to knowingly abuse the trust system for your own agendas it is quite clear that any services you run are to be treated as suspect and warnings should be issued to those that use them.

I say again therefore that I would avoid  http://bit.do/yoggescrow or yoggescrow services because they are operated by a proven trust abuser and therefore should be treated with extreme caution if not avoided altogether. He is now also spreading lies regarding myself lying but will not provide evidence.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/yogg-this-user-is-a-protector-of-liars-and-abuser-of-the-trust-system-himself-5098315

The same for https://www.timelord2067.com this site is operated by an untrustworthy person and as such I would advice avoid visiting it since untrustworthy persons have been known in the past to use phishing scams , virus, and trojans. Untrustworthy persons should not be trusted. Seems like a reasonable approach to me.

This is simply a fact: that if you prove yourselves to be untrustworthy and knowingly and willfully misuse red trust to ruin other persons accounts for your own personal reasons then you must be treated as untrustworthy and so must your services.

You don't get to abuse the trust system and ruin other peoples accounts then cry for special consideration from those same people. You treat them as a trust worthy person would and perhaps then you will be treated the same.

Until then you are welcome to bump this thread as often as you like crying about your unfair treatment and so can your ass licking noob trash merit begging imbecile friends.

Let me walk you idiots through it.

1. if you willingly abuse the trust system you are untrustworthy.
2. untrustworthy persons providing services to others should be considered risky. Therefore extreme caution should be taken when considering using a proven untrustworthy persons services.

sorry if that is difficult to understand but if you keep thinking about it may sink in.

Yogg "Yeah, we get it, life is not fair"

Sorry, but I aim to make it fairer. Nothing more.

The problem with cryptohunter and his clique is there.
Two persons who think differently will ultimately always trust their thinking more than any other thought from the "outside".

cryptohunter gathered consorts under that banner, and they have their own way to see things. That's all in their honor.
The thing is, how much users of the forum will sympathize with their cause. A majority or a minority ?

If you need to resort to lies to prove your point, you show how extended is your thinking, how solid is your cause and also the limits of it.

You can go around and brag as much as you can. Yeah, we get it, life is not fair.

In the meantime, except from consuming a little bit more resources to store your vindictive posts, what good have you done ?
What do you do for people ?

Timelord2067 does a lot by providing content to educate people about bitcoin.
Thank you very much for that !

Its not fair to put blame on someone without proper evidence. OP i think you can offer a great service for the community here... Can you guess it??? I think you got the power of great imagination and you should guess what am i thinking about your service. I will tell about the service at the end of my comment.Till then use your great imagination power to get the name. Lol.

How could you say that those website got virus or trojan. Is that confirmed by  your "great imagination" power or you are the victim. I am eagerly waiting here to see the evidence you got against those website links that thess are phishing.

I beleive its just a nasty try to spoil someones reputation.
Everyone who knows you better can easily understand that this thread is not different from your others meaningless poems.

Service that match with you: you can request to forum moderators to open a new section for you where you can teach shitposters.   

Archived for future reference: http://archive.fo/jXlZh