I said could at some point in the future. If you are untrustworthy enough to abuse the trust system and give red trust to someone for voicing both facts and opinion then you could be untrustworthy enough for anything else.
Your logic is a fallacy.
1. I said could
2. Being clear now(according to you) does not mean it will be in the future.
He has no issue with placing red trust (for scammers) on my account. His logic is a fallacy. Tarnishing my reputation. For post containing facts and some opinions that I can substantiate.
Protecting a proven trust abuser makes you look stupid or actually perhaps untrustworthy.
I am the victim I hope that is clear to you. Attacking the victim is worse than the other claims I have made about you so far.
In light of the fact theymos said red trust is for scammer or those directly related to scams I find it strange that you should focus on my reasonable warnings to others.