Topic: TMAN's thread for bitching about my tags. - page 2. (Read 840 times)

I will try to keep it short same as my pm to you.
Your negative feedback in my profile was in the same time as Lauda's and owlcatz and i believe because of their words.
After conversation with them, they removed the negative feedback from my profile.

But let's keep it straight.
I know its not the right thing to post but i will give it a try.
I know we had quarrels but that's why people communicate and they have different view point, to not agree with each other.
You said bad things about me which in most cases were not right, and i said things about you which in most cases were not right.
Depends on the view point both of us were not right.
People should respect each other and be good instead of bad, because being a bad is always the most easy way.
I am here to tell you that i removed the negative feedback from your profile, no matter it means nothing to you.
I am human and i do realize my mistakes which i will not repeat in future.
People do deserve their second chance and im giving you mine no matter you care about it or no.
Also i would like to say i am sorry for going to far with the quarrels and that was not the right way.
If you like to remove the negative feedback from my profile, feel free to, i do not force you, but i believe we all do deserve second chance.
People should leave some negative things in the past and move forward for better.
Do whatever you wish to do, just know that i feel sorry for saying and doing things which i may not be totally right about you.
Now my conscience is clean.
If you want to do the same, feel free to, if not, thanks for reading this useless spam.

I did study your post history and concluded that you're not the original owner of the account.  That means you either bought it or hacked it, and all of the early trusts are thus invalid.  You have an older account with a lot of positive trust that you didn't earn, and that's dishonest.  People who check your trust wall think they're dealing with the member who owned the account in 2014, but that clearly isn't the case.

This is an excellent example of why I don't trust account sellers and sold accounts.  Can you imagine the havoc it would wreak here if someone got their hands on a DT account and started to leverage that trust in order to scam?  That's not the case with you, but do the thought experiment yourself.  That's just one of the problems with account sales.  You most definitely deserve the red trust.

Did you buy it then? How else would you explain such stark differences between 2014, 2017, and 2018, and the gaps? And the inability to sign a message or even post on tumblr?

Each of these can probably be explained separately with some sort of excuse. But put together it doesn't make any sense that you could be the original owner of the account.

Please try studying the issue once and get to a conclusion which would give justice. I in no way tried to do any scams here still I have been accused for that and also got a red trust. As you already see I had some bad time with crypto and thought of putting end to it and lost some of the previous stuff. But that does not mean my account is hacked. Lauda is just trying to drag me in some accusations for which she could get a red on my profile. But please try to check my work I am working very clearly as a bounty manager and try to keep my work as clean and helpful the the forum as I can.

Oh yeah, I think that account has definitely changed hands.  He used to post in perfect English in 2014 with stuff like this:


And then this in Oct. 2014:

....followed by a huge posting gap that ended in Dec. 2016 with this post:

After that, English is broken as all hell, as demonstrated by this post:

Will tag the account now.

So consensus is TMAN wrong for reason but right for tag? I’ll change it shortly.

Suchmoon you can’t be chucked out, you know that already. Stop making Lauda big headed with power

I have written and applied a proper tag.

There's a reason why I'm the master; TMAN has lots to learn. Don't worry my child, I will keep you safe.

Based on posting style and gaps the account may have changed hands twice between 2014 and 1018. Whoever used it in 2017 was putting spaces before commas and periods, and there are large gaps before and after that stretch. The content of posts/topics also differs between those three periods. So at best the current pete is the 3rd pete. That's probably a good enough reason for someone to tag him but I still think tagging for saying things about spammers is not. Please don't kick me out of the cult almighty Lauda for disagreeing with TMAN

Yes, you are right it was just use by me for my sis to get loose from this stuff. Still better I do not explain it here.

Then I would think that TMAN's feedback ought to say something different instead of how it reads now.  Hell, if he's using a hacked account I'll tag him myself, but that's not the reason TMAN gave.

Let me guess, he will say that it was only temporary like everything else posted in 2014 and prior.

I stumbled upon this thread as I saw @petestheman bounty thread and interested in one of those. Since I don't want to join account buyer campaign, could you provide some proof? Maybe post something like bitcoin meme on your Tumblr account?


Maybe you really lost access to your bitcoin address because it's been inactive since 2015.

I'll keep my eyes on this thread. Thanks!

Disagreed. Take a look at what this so called I'm-not-hacked user advertises himself as in his "bounty management" thread. Combine those with what he think is a decent poster --> basically, a fraud using a stolen/hacked account.

Proving otherwise is trivial, and this wouldn't be the first case that someone got tagged for this.

What I believe petestheman misunderstand the question, and he continually argue with that. Question was regarding decent poster, but he had mentioned worst poster. In my opinion he don't know the meaning of decent and he just looking who have posted much and didn't received merit. His post is proving that he doesn't know what is decent is really or he just underestimate decent word.

Neutral feedback appropriate in my opinion also.


Edit : Look like account handover on multiple hand.




 

I see he has applied now to one of my campaign, he is not accepted yet and I also do not intend to accept him as his post history says that he is not a worth poster and most of his posts are in bounties section which does not qualify for a signature campaign.

Edit: if you are pointing to Facebook campaign in which he also registered. I am willing to accept him in Facebook as he has 750+ friends is eligible by rules.

are you paying this guy?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kukukoko-1781960

in your spreadsheet
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bq0ZPWIMEksvfa6ZuCWkBkjFReqZLx-D5ts_eJIk4Fg/edit#gid=1284949262

Thank you for your opinion here.

As you said some of his posts are in games and round section but some of them are also in collectable section.

That's is defiantly not my alt as I just found some random profiles from the collectable section and posted it there to let the OP know that there are some people who don't deserved to be banned from posting. I never said they are worthy of merits.

---

As I already said I took some break after that period I posted the address and also I usually just try to exchange my crypto to fiat and don't intend to store much of it on a single address and private keys.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49244997

In that post Pete highlights 2 users who are making “good” posts who haven’t achieved 1 merit in 200+ posts. In my view that should exclude him as a bounty manager. Or am I way off here peeps?

Also @pete, why won’t you sign a message from the stakes address that Lauda posted?

Is he getting paid by petestheman's bounty for his signature and posts nothing but free raffle claims?
Then maybe yes..

If it is not petestheman's bounty he is in or isn't getting paid by that sig for those posts then probably no..  
Someone would really pay for that signature on his posts? If it is paid then that manager needs some correction..
Who runs this blocknode bounty he is wearing a sig for?

But only for petestheman saying not to ban him I don't think so..

I stopped right here, looking at the posts of the user you said was under-merited:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=732010.  The first few pages of his post history are just his name in Games & Rounds, and that goes back to at least November.  Any other "posts" he made are just stupid thank you's or other garbage.  I'm assuming that's one of your alt accounts, because no one in their right mind would think that account's posts are merit-worthy.

Having said that, I don't think you ought to have gotten a neg for it.  That's between TMAN and you, however.  I would suggest to TMAN that Theymos doesn't want shitposters tagged anymore and although this is somewhat of a different situation, it's in the same ballpark.