Topic: To invest in an ICO, Reviewing of the team behind is necessary? (Read 896 times)
I have been involved with ICOs since a lot of days, I never saw an ICO project without team members. Scam ICO projects also use someone's profile to claim their team. I don't know where you found an ICO without the team members. Some ICO projects are not like to mention team's list in the official website, you can check their whitepaper, and if their whitepaper hs no team member listed, then avoid that scam ICO. It's easy.
November 16, 2018, 03:22:51 AM
It depends on what kind of investment you want to have. If you want a flip, maybe the team is not the most important thing. In contrast, if you want a long-term investment, analyzing the team is very important.
November 16, 2018, 03:19:44 AM
Actually the Team is one of the factors that investors must know. Why? Because the team on one of the projects affected the size of the believers to invest in their project. If they are behind the scenes, maybe it should be careful. Because investors certainly need to know whether this project is really run by good people or not.
November 16, 2018, 03:06:17 AM
the team will be deciding whether the ICO could walk well and not. When it is handled by the best people then great opportunities for the ICO could be successful. When they hide the identity of the team then can become a big question what is it about it? an indication of the scam there is certainly as many suspicions of it.
November 16, 2018, 02:46:24 AM
if they hide their team members identity then you should doubt it. why would they hide? maybe because they hide something bad bad like their team members identity is all fake. even a scam ICOs show their fake team members identity.
November 16, 2018, 02:29:03 AM
Professional teams that prepare ICO usually do not hide their data, on the contrary, often people go to the individual and trust them. Therefore, when choosing a project, see the technical documentation, but also plan to collect information about the developers. A quality team will not spoil its reputation.
November 16, 2018, 02:14:06 AM
Most ICO's tend to hide their members behind the project. Is not it necessary to know about the team also who are building an ICO project, including other factors of it?
Lol, team now is probably one of the most important thing in ICO analysis! Now there is a trend for Korean teams, and also if team is famous and well experienced the project is gonna moon!
November 08, 2018, 12:40:57 AM
Most ICO's tend to hide their members behind the project. Is not it necessary to know about the team also who are building an ICO project, including other factors of it?
Lol, team now is probably one of the most important thing in ICO analysis! Now there is a trend for Korean teams, and also if team is famous and well experienced the project is gonna moon!
November 08, 2018, 12:31:01 AM
Reviewing the ICO project team is the most critical step, because the strength and credibility of the team determines whether the project will succeed!
November 08, 2018, 12:23:46 AM
I am curious about how you review the team? Many projects can bluff and you can't find real developers. This is easy to be deceived. Unless you can reach out to the developer team and get face-to-face with them. Otherwise ICO risks are very high.
November 08, 2018, 12:03:41 AM
yes surely it is very necessary. we must know all the background of the project developer team that we want to invest. because currently there are many scam projects that use data or photos of other people to be made into their team, we must be vigilant. one of the benchmark projects is quality is the team, and you have to know that.
I wonder if there is anyone in the forum that doesn't understand the importance of researching the developers behind the coin, because the market of icos is full of scammers and I like many people in the forum have wasted my time and money in useless projects and I cannot afford the luxury to do so again. November 07, 2018, 02:42:46 AM
the identity of the team is to be published to the public. This will become the deciding factor whether projects actually carried out by the right person or not. When the identity of the only hidden or not displayed is certainly becoming a problem that should be questioned visibility.
November 07, 2018, 02:21:39 AM
Knowing the tea one if the key factor of a good ICO, but it's not a guarantee the project is legit or will succeed.
November 07, 2018, 02:03:07 AM
I wouldn't invest in projects where team members are hidden It's necessary, of course, to consider all aspects of the projects, white paper, MVP and the roadmap, but I don't really understand for what purposes it is necessary to hide the project developers.
If I see such an ICO I won’t even need anyone to tell me it’s pure scam. How can others show their members and you will be only one that is having members hidden, that means it’s scam and there is no explanation to be made for it. And it’s good to check out an ICO very well before you go for it. There are some of them that shows their members but at the end up it turns out to be a scam. November 05, 2018, 01:25:10 AM
Mate no one invest money blindly these days. They cross-check everything like how it can benefit to them, they check their team, development etc. it's already written in our fate like what will happen. Sometimes you research on a coin and you look at their popularity everything and you invest. But in your time if the value goes down no one can do anything, I am not saying you will lose your money. But you have to wait for a long time to get back a good return.
November 05, 2018, 01:02:41 AM
Most ICO's tend to hide their members behind the project. Is not it necessary to know about the team also who are building an ICO project, including other factors of it?
I can’t remember coming across any ICO that doesn’t show the members that are behind the project 🤔but if you come across such an ICO then I will advise you not to even think about going for it cause that is scam in a broad daylight lol. And it’s always good to know everything about an ICO, especially the team that are behind and many others before you can decide on whether to invest or not. 
November 02, 2018, 06:08:10 AM
I wouldn't invest in projects where team members are hidden It's necessary, of course, to consider all aspects of the projects, white paper, MVP and the roadmap, but I don't really understand for what purposes it is necessary to hide the project developers.
November 02, 2018, 05:50:48 AM
first thing when I analize ICO, I look at teamprofiles in LinkedIn. if they have good old profiles with good marks - that is the good sign for the project.
November 02, 2018, 05:47:32 AM
It is necessary to check the team and the actual product behind them. Most of the ICOs are bullshit which showed when 99% of them failed during the bear market.
November 02, 2018, 05:40:27 AM
Most ICO's tend to hide their members behind the project. Is not it necessary to know about the team also who are building an ICO project, including other factors of it?
of course everything becomes research starting from the team and developers.
the expertise of the team is a benchmark in the success of an ico project, especially long term. the important thing is products and technology
Jump to: