Topic: Tomatocage is trust abuser/lier - page 2. (Read 3984 times)

I had a good experience with tomatocage, could you show a proof that he admitted that he made a mistake? You just show a post where he says he will not remove his negative trust ratings. Thanks.

It seems a lot more bitcointalk members are not convinced by V Kodoff's actions and behaviour since its deserved -ve trust increased quite a lot.


Don't bother too much about it. I think however, if you received a false rating from him, you should be entitled to leave it back an equivalent -ve trust feedback. As Welsh said: don't worry! You can ignore it since his account is totally FUBAR and carries no weight what so ever. Do you think anyone here is willing to take him seriously again?

He did the same to me. I think he just randomly rated us. An diot

Why is my trust feedback have you saying scammer, with this link in the reference? How am i involved?

Don't worry his account carries no weight what so ever, no one will ever take him seriously again. You can simply ignore it. Judging by his responses he can't take criticism very well and being told when he's wrong.

My conclusion: the OP is 12. Actually, I think he's 5. Nope, I could actually spell properly when I was 5,so your definitely not 5. I don't even use the slang that you use and refrain from using the word "nigger". I'm pretty sure that's derogatory. Anyway  I hope your trust isn't removed.

Hi, I am reading this tread because I was rated negative by OP.  Have never had deal with him, he gave this tread refference as a reason.

@OP

TomatoeCage is one of the more trustworthy people on this forum.


I am highly suspecting you are an idiot.



~BCX~

The reason for it is because if someone scams a lot of people at once they will show up as very untrusted so they will not be able to scam others

Learn something new everyday! Thanks for explaining that to me, quickseller.

When someone gets a lot of negative trust at one time the weight to additional negative trust ratings is increased.

Not sure how, but I somehow managed to make V Kodoff's trust go from -10 to -1263. Either way, well deserved.

tomatocage is fairer than most especially vod.

Well, V. Kodoff decided to leave me some feedback:


I love how you linked reference to this thread 

I'm on default trust at depth=2, so...ouch?

Dear OP: It's spelled "liar"...

I'm the joint.  Hi.


It's always ironic when someone makes a mistake at the same time they're calling others stupid, wouldn't you agree?


I joined this forum in 2011, sir.

I think this post is going to prove beyond a doubt that you are right in this case

/s

And who the fuck are you poor ass nigger?
Google me and you will understand with who the fuck you are talking with you autist fuck.
When you want to talk with me,firstly talk with sir you begging starving poor ass nigger

Oh, that's much better.  Who are you?


That's a low standard for proof.


Have you dealt with Bitcoin?


Obviously.  Again, who are you?


Did you satisfy the concerns of your potential customers?  Obviously not.


And none of us want to be the first.


That's not very reassuring.  Sounds like you didn't learn your lesson the first two times, so why should we assume your security practices have changed with respect to your BTCtalk account?


Stemming from the last point, how can I even know that you're the rightful owner of that BTCtalk account?


You can refuse them, but I think you'll find that the community hasn't been uniquely inconsiderate to you.  Any new account demanding blind trust will get a similar response (I say "blind trust" because your outside feedback in no way constitutes proof of honesty).


Feedback can be bought on the cheap.


Unless, of course, you bought it.


You may be an impersonator.  I refer you back to your poor security practices.


If it's false, then that sucks, and it's unfortunate your reputation is being smeared unjustly.  I would recommend that you consider how to adapt to the ocean you swim in rather than trying to change the ocean itself.


I covered the Trendon Shavers ponzi story, which is transparent.  You send first (do you trust me now?).


Easily.  Actually, people sell outside feedback from this forum.


I must be a brainwashed idiot.


I remember a month or two ago someone on this forum was severely framed for openly stating he was looking to conduct micro-trades with the sole intention of building positive feedback.  I'm sure it wasn't the only time that's happened around here.


You may be trusted to those who know you.  We don't.  Again, who are you?


And that's why you care about the opinions of a select, cancerous few, right?


Scammers aren't banned here.  I can't speak for others, but I assume that I can think and be responsible for myself.  There's also an "ignore" button.


Yes, I agree some abuse the trust system, though what I consider abusive someone else may not.  It's also known that accounts are bought and sold here.  Again, I can think for myself.  All you're experiencing are the opinions of a few individuals who have independently decided that your proof of honesty is missing.


Clever.


Statements are often best expressed within paragraphs.


How many different people are you addressing?


That's clearly what happened.


Sike!


Einhorn and Finkle...Finkle and Einhorn.


Well, this was amusing.

Your aggressive nature isn't going to help you. It's all good saying this, but you need to back it up with evidence. Otherwise, your not going to be taking seriously. I don't know how you claim that you are more trusted than TomatoCage, here at this forum I would like to think TomatoCage is much more trusted than you are here, and that's all that matters. No one wants to know what you've done on other websites or outside of the Bitcoin world. But, if you are going to provide evidence that you are trusted from other sources, provide evidence.

What puzzles me is your claim that TomatoCage is the one abusing is powers, when you were
buying negative trust to be put on his profile: Buying negative trust thread

Looking for a loan of 12-15 btc and offering Counter strike skins as collateral? Loan request I can see why people were sceptical of that. Even if it is worth up to $10k.