Topic: ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT - page 21. (Read 157147 times)

you n00bs are so incoherent its just pitiful. fork off already.

Yes it is and every small blocker should pay now the average needed btc fee for any new post on this topic.

Have fun to get it calced correctly :-)

How is SegWit bloating Bitcoin?
Also blockstream doesn't have control over Bitcoins development that's just FUD.


You seem pretty reasonable.
Is there a reason you support a HF over SegWit + other solutions ?

this is so fucked up. man you need to get yourself checked for psychological disorders.

Still here for rescue and try to get back ALL into the boat + helping to start THINK BIG !

(hope this bRAKEs the ICE a bit  where other in charge fail)

Pretty much, except that I'm piss poor.

fully agree with you.. them bigblockers who love blockstream and want 5.7mb blocks. have lost faith in bitcoin.
they complain it cant scale
they say the only solution is to move to different layers and sidechains(altcoins).
they argue and say anything that is part of the open community is bad because they only want one business to destroy bitcoin now.

if they really want to have blockstream control. maybe they should just move over to "liquid" and play with them altcoins, pretending its bitcoin but faster..

they really need to just admit that they want to bloat bitcoin so their favorite altcoin can take the bitcoin fame..

Why are you big blockers still in Bitcoin?
I thought the majority of "big blockers" now regard Bitcoin as a failed experiment and willing to let go of it and move on to alt coins like Ethereum?
What does Bitcoin provide that Ethereum doesn't?

I regard Bitcoin as the gold of crypto and the fact that it has stayed resilient against recent attacks from corporations and governments proves that it's still "the gold of crypto".
But that's not the opinion of a "big blocker"...

The naivety in Core/Blockstream is remarkable.

When the hammer comes down, Core is going to get smacked.

Did you really think chinese and russian businessmen would settle for glass beads?

This is turning into a Core #REKT thread.

says carlton. the 5.7mb lobbyist

Why so sure of yourself?

Are you some kind of anarcho-libertarian ego-tripping male hopped up on his own intellectual brilliance re-inforced by financial rewards?

At this point it is certainly futile, but still appreciated.

If not for anything else, just as reminder what a sane human expression
looks like.

How did it come to be like this?

Perhaps this is just what happens when you have a male-only "community"
filled with individuals already sure of their intellectual brilliance, and reinforce their belief by giving them
financial rewards. Add to the mix anarcho-libertarian philosophy of selfishness and the fact that
most of the communication is with unknowns via text on screen, and this is the cake you get.

2MB2MB2MB lobbyists:

How long do you guys need? It's been over 12 months since Gavin started this war of words, and you're still running on words. 18 months maybe? Do you need 2 years?

It did.

Correct. The point of it is that nobody in their right mind would run it.

Are you referring to blocks greater than 1 MB in Core, or a controversial HF?

Core has agreed to nothing. You can't blame the open-source project for your lack of comprehension.

this thread is actually about avoiding the hard fork. and by trying to ensure core doesnt release code.. and to scare people away from implementations that included the 2mb rule..
without core releasing the code at the same time as classic. then it was obvious that things wont move forward, so people got bored of waiting for core to join in..


if you sweep away the smoke and mirrors.. if core released the code along side classic.. then there would be no "change in government" but instead an open choice to use any of the many different code bases that would all have the 2mb rule...
meaning no government at all..

but the smoke and mirrors is to say that classic wanted to be government. purely to scare people away from it. and now blockstream(core) wont release the code because they think they are government and its their highway or no way. (the whole bait and switch)

if only core was to just release the 2mb code already and then other implementations would too. then the ball would already be rolling and we can actually start talking about when the pools should adapt too, but only when the pools feel its safe to do so because they dont want their blocks rejected after all..

refusing to release code to make USERS ready, just because blockstream(core) thinks that the pools will lose blocks.. is obsurd. the pools wont even try making bigger blocks unless they seen that users were ready.. so atleast let the users be ready!

but Classic represents a change in government. miners are willing to avoid this by making an agreement with core, in that core will eventually( in 2017) support a block size incress to 2MB
core seems to have 0 intent on making good on their agreement
and are trying to BS their way out of the agreement.
saying things like " TECHNICALLY we didnt agree to anything     "

Yep, and the first time that a block greater than 1MB gets built upon, and another atop that, and another, and ..., I will continue securing the integrity of the chain. You?

Market share? 

By running nodes and mining, even if you are BU/Classic shills, you are helping bitcoin. I am happy that you are trying to prevent changes to the protocol. No hard forks gives stability and resiliency. Thank you!

You are desperate because you keep on shouting your nonsense on this sensorshipped forum. You are not "quietly working"   

Uhh... didn't Classic already "release the code"?

Isn't the point of this thread that no one is using it?

LOL?

While I am running BU, not XT nor Classic, I would like to point out that it is you who appears desperate, JJG. We are not desperate. For as long as Classic holds the market share that it does, Core cannot amass the 95% required for activation.

Can you imagine the crow eating required to reduce the activation threshold?

I mean, not like it can't be done. But such shame... such shame...

No, we're not desperate. We're quietly working toward the goal of large block adoption. Until the reality is in the past, it is merely an open question.

Cheers!