ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT - page 27.

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

2011 vintage FUD: Deepbit has 51% ZOMG BTC DOOMED

Quote from: jwzguy on July 07, 2011, 10:07:58 AM

Do "PANIC! Deepbit is too big!" threads and "BTC will never succeed" threads make up over 50% of this board yet?

2016 vintage FUD: 1MB blocks are too small ZOMG BTC DOOMED

Quote from: chopstick on May 23, 2016, 11:54:25 PM

Quote from: AliceGored on May 23, 2016, 10:25:53 PM

Those were warnings about what was coming. The price jumped on pre halving FOMO. ETH went from peanuts to over $1 Billion market cap, now handling 40,000 tx per day that wouldn't fit on the Bitcoin network.

Yep, and the Blockstreamers think it's just a coincidence. And it's a "greedy self interest" ( Huh

) for asking for a simple scaling solution that could pretty much be implemented immediately.

hdbuck

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1002

Quote from: marcus_of_augustus on May 23, 2016, 08:51:37 PM

Quote from: chopstick on May 23, 2016, 08:29:36 PM

Lol, there are literally hundreds of people calling for a blocksize increase. And unless you are wearing blinders, it is obviously needed so we can scale at the present moment. Blocks are full and bitcoin is hurting while tx's and users are being kicked off the network. What about that do you not understand?

It is not a greedy self-interest. That does not even make sense. It is an obviously needed change for the good of the bitcoin network.

... yeah, as I thought, people like you are pretty hopelessly beyond help at this point, so even some helpful hints are just going to be falling on deaf ears.

You have become the epitome of the character in your avatar ... however the current object of your obsession is not bitcoin but something as unobtainable and vaguely defined as "scaling" of a p2p value network protocol. This is the thing about obsessively destructive personalities the objects of their obsession become more and more unobtainable, like "a ring to rule them all".

Hundreds 'calling for a blocksize increase" and thousands expending real resource on running full nodes 24/7 supporting status-quo for now. How's your maths? Calculate this, 1+1=time to stfu, until you know yourself better and exactly what it is that you are petulantly demanding from others.

lol at that 1+1=time to stfu Grin

Poor ph0rkers now whining for core devs to write the HF they could not implement by themselves with their brilliant classic devs and c0myoonityy.

HF did not happen then, and it will certainly not happen any time soon. Cry

chopstick

legendary

Activity: 992

Merit: 1000

Quote from: AliceGored on May 23, 2016, 10:25:53 PM

Those were warnings about what was coming. The price jumped on pre halving FOMO. ETH went from peanuts to over $1 Billion market cap, now handling 40,000 tx per day that wouldn't fit on the Bitcoin network.

Yep, and the Blockstreamers think it's just a coincidence. And it's a "greedy self interest" ( Huh

) for asking for a simple scaling solution that could pretty much be implemented immediately.

AlexGR

legendary

Activity: 1708

Merit: 1049

Quote

No, you heard they were going to become full last year. Now they are.

Oh nooooooo Cry

(<= I bet you can find a colorful pony meme crying Wink

)

AliceGored

member

Activity: 117

Merit: 10

Quote from: AlexGR on May 23, 2016, 09:30:21 PM

Quote from: chopstick on May 23, 2016, 08:29:36 PM

Blocks are full

We've been hearing this since last year.

No, you heard they were going to become full last year. Now they are.

Quote from: AlexGR on May 23, 2016, 09:30:21 PM

What happened that "blocks are full"?

Satoshi/byte has begun rising. Doubling in the last 3 days actually. Hit over 100 sat/byte [over 10 cents for small 225 byte tx] on a couple blocks today.

Quote from: AlexGR on May 23, 2016, 09:30:21 PM

Some were making prophecies of doom, destruction, crashes, etc etc, yet nothing happened and price doubled - despite the FUDstorm and fork threats.

Those were warnings about what was coming. The price jumped on pre halving FOMO. ETH went from peanuts to over $1 Billion market cap, now handling 40,000 tx per day that wouldn't fit on the Bitcoin network.

Quote from: AlexGR on May 23, 2016, 09:30:21 PM

At most a bit of spam was replaced with a few more legit txs and that was the end of the story.

iCEBREAKER

legendary

Activity: 2156

Merit: 1072

Crypto is the separation of Power and State.

Quote from: TooDumbForBitcoin on May 23, 2016, 10:11:49 PM

You left out the part where the $0.04 USD fee that today guarantees inclusion in the next block is dragging bitcoin down.

4 cents?!

That's a very high price to pay for simply transferring value to anyone/anywhere, securely and with no permission required. Cry

We were told Bitcoin is magic internet money. Since when does magic require outrageous, unaffordable, disproportionate 4 cent fees?

Bitcoin must promise FREE TX 4EVA, or it will be replaced with altcoins.

I thought this was America. Angry

BlockedSchemeCore is crippling and strangling baby honey badger in his crib.

4 cent transaction fees are Evil BlockedScheme's way to sabotage Bitcoin.

They are rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic.

/incoherent Gavinista buttraging

TooDumbForBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1001

Quote from: chopstick on May 23, 2016, 08:29:36 PM

Lol, there are literally hundreds of people calling for a blocksize increase. And unless you are wearing blinders, it is obviously needed so we can scale at the present moment. Blocks are full and bitcoin is hurting while tx's and users are being kicked off the network. What about that do you not understand?

It is not a greedy self-interest. That does not even make sense. It is an obviously needed change for the good of the bitcoin network.

You left out the part where the $0.04 USD fee that today guarantees inclusion in the next block is dragging bitcoin down.

AlexGR

legendary

Activity: 1708

Merit: 1049

Quote from: chopstick on May 23, 2016, 08:29:36 PM

Blocks are full

We've been hearing this since last year. What happened that "blocks are full"? Some were making prophecies of doom, destruction, crashes, etc etc, yet nothing happened and price doubled - despite the FUDstorm and fork threats.

At most a bit of spam was replaced with a few more legit txs and that was the end of the story.

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Quote from: chopstick on May 23, 2016, 08:29:36 PM

Lol, there are literally hundreds of people calling for a blocksize increase. And unless you are wearing blinders, it is obviously needed so we can scale at the present moment. Blocks are full and bitcoin is hurting while tx's and users are being kicked off the network. What about that do you not understand?

It is not a greedy self-interest. That does not even make sense. It is an obviously needed change for the good of the bitcoin network.

... yeah, as I thought, people like you are pretty hopelessly beyond help at this point, so even some helpful hints are just going to be falling on deaf ears.

You have become the epitome of the character in your avatar ... however the current object of your obsession is not bitcoin but something as unobtainable and vaguely defined as "scaling" of a p2p value network protocol. This is the thing about obsessively destructive personalities the objects of their obsession become more and more unobtainable, like "a ring to rule them all".

Hundreds 'calling for a blocksize increase" and thousands expending real resource on running full nodes 24/7 supporting status-quo for now. How's your maths? Calculate this, 1+1=time to stfu, until you know yourself better and exactly what it is that you are petulantly demanding from others.

chopstick

legendary

Activity: 992

Merit: 1000

Lol, there are literally hundreds of people calling for a blocksize increase. And unless you are wearing blinders, it is obviously needed so we can scale at the present moment. Blocks are full and bitcoin is hurting while tx's and users are being kicked off the network. What about that do you not understand?

It is not a greedy self-interest. That does not even make sense. It is an obviously needed change for the good of the bitcoin network.

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Quote from: chopstick on May 23, 2016, 07:45:41 PM

LOL... because wanting on-chain scaling while blocks are full is some-how a "greedy self-interest", what a joke

I didn't say anything about bitcoin scaling, that's precisely your problem, you are projecting your greedy self-interests onto everybody ... and then calling yourself a 'community' that is demanding something from other people.

Get past yourself and stop speaking for everybody else .... and you might start to get what you want.

beastmodeBiscuitGravy

full member

Activity: 181

Merit: 100

This turned out well.

chopstick

legendary

Activity: 992

Merit: 1000

LOL... because wanting on-chain scaling while blocks are full is some-how a "greedy self-interest", what a joke

I think most people want bitcoin to be able to scale rather than lose users. And that's what's happening right now, people are switching to alts while Core flounders about like a chicken with it's head cut off.

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Quote from: chopstick on May 23, 2016, 04:30:04 PM

Antpool Will Not Run SegWit Without Bitcoin Block Size Increase Hard Fork

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/antpool-will-not-run-segwit-without-block-size-increase-hard-fork-1464028753

blah-de-l;ah.. and to make a compromise and give something the community clearly wants - a blocksize increase

just give it up with this "what the community wants" bullshit ... it didn't work then and it won't work now, in fact it turns a lot of people off from your cause (w/e that is)

You don't speak for anybody except your self-interested, greedy little selves. As it ever has been.

rizzlarolla

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1001

Quote from: chopstick on May 23, 2016, 04:30:04 PM

Antpool Will Not Run SegWit Without Bitcoin Block Size Increase Hard Fork

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/antpool-will-not-run-segwit-without-block-size-increase-hard-fork-1464028753

Now it's time for Core to show that they can be democratic and to make a compromise and give something the community clearly wants - a blocksize increase, alongside Segwit/LN. If Core can't even do this, then they will just further prove their own incompetence.

And if Core do this under duress, their hand being called,
Can Core then still claim competence?

^ incompetence?

hdbuck

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1002

Quote from: chopstick on May 23, 2016, 04:30:04 PM

Antpool Will Not Run SegWit Without Bitcoin Block Size Increase Hard Fork

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/antpool-will-not-run-segwit-without-block-size-increase-hard-fork-1464028753

Now it's time for Core to show that they can be democratic and to make a compromise and give something the community clearly wants - a blocksize increase, alongside Segwit/LN. If Core can't even do this, then they will just further prove their own incompetence.

Bitcoin is neither democratic, nor a compromise. Sorrayy. Undecided

chopstick

legendary

Activity: 992

Merit: 1000

Antpool Will Not Run SegWit Without Bitcoin Block Size Increase Hard Fork

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/antpool-will-not-run-segwit-without-block-size-increase-hard-fork-1464028753

Now it's time for Core to show that they can be democratic and to make a compromise and give something the community clearly wants - a blocksize increase, alongside Segwit/LN. If Core can't even do this, then they will just further prove their own incompetence.

TooDumbForBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1001

Geniuses over in cypherdefendant's support group forum screaming FUD at johnny100 because they don't see how "750 of last 1000" Classic activation prevents activation at "800 of last 1000".

Let's count together:

1,2,3,4, ..... 747,748,749,800! See, it's possible!!!

marcus_of_augustus

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 2349

Eadem mutata resurgo

Quote from: franky1 on May 22, 2016, 06:03:55 PM

trying to put people that want logical capcaity increase into a cult bubble is the failing of a blockstreamer pretending they themselves are not in a cult.
trying to say people that want a hard fork are altcoiners.. are usually the failings of people that love altcoins themselves.

yet its easy to see the blockstream faith because they really do fail at using latin in their posts or footers.

wait for it..
in the next 48 hours a blockstreamer will have to use latin somewhere to try to act like they know something..

i read your words (once) and have no clue what you are trying to say

franky1

legendary

Activity: 4396

Merit: 4755

trying to put people that want logical capcaity increase into XT/classic bubble is the failing of a blockstreamer pretending they themselves are not in a cult.
trying to say people that want a hard fork are altcoiners.. are usually the failings of people that love altcoins themselves.

i still laugh at you blind believers saying 2mb is bad, yet the over 5mb of blockstream roadmap features is good..

its easy to see the blockstream faith because they really do fail at using latin in their posts or footers.

wait for it..
in the next 48 hours a blockstreamer will have to use latin somewhere to try to act like they know something..

Topic: ToominCoin aka "Bitcoin_Classic" #R3KT - page 27. (Read 157135 times)