Look at you.. coming up with a distracting multiple choice test.
It's not a multiple choice test, you adorable numbskull. It is a listing of the properties of various aspects of the system. It is a simple statement of fact.
Your statement of facts have proven quite questionable in the past, so seemed somewhat inconsistent and like a multiple choice test to me.
I'm talking about the whole system in which blocks cannot be easily edited by the whole system of computers...
No - I don't get your point. The only way blocks can be edited [within] the whole system of computers is if greater than 50% of the hashpower colludes to do so. This is the same whether Classic or Core is the way forward. Surely, you've been around long enough to have absorbed this much?
Seems like we kind of agree about what immutability means.
What? Now you want to switch away from Nakamoto Consensus too?
I am not asserting to switch anything, and I am not asserting to be any kind of technical expert.
All I had been asserting prior to your seemingly multiple choice test post was that bitcoin is not broken, and if there are proposals to change bitcoin, then the burden is on those proposing a change to convince TPTB in bitcoinlandia to agree to the change and to get it incorporated into the protocol.. They do that by providing facts and logic otherwise the status quo continues...
Accordingly, we are chugging along in bitcoinlandia and the prices is crashing... Probably going to test $725 again in the next few days, but surely it could take a few weeks too.. I don't really care. I think bitcoin is doing well in this $400 to $700 range too (but seems like the upward pressures based on bitcoin's ongoing technical soundness and its security as a storage of value are going to cause bitcoin prices to further crash..... up).