If you are not part of primedice team then I can consider your review or experience in using the primedice platform as valid but if you are one of their marketing team to spread the good news of primedice then I can say that your review can't be fully trusted.
No, I'm not a Primedice employee. I just think they have a solid dice gambling product. Even so, as some here have also pointed out, it does have its flaws, of course.
It's not exactly the most modern or innovative website, for instance, and the fact they don't offer any other games can be a bit frustrating if you like to switch games now and then.
Regardless, they're pretty good, and (looking at how the poll's going so far) it seems like many people agree with me.
I think that Wolf.bet has the best dice interface among all the crypto gambling sites that offer Dice as a playable game. The design is slick and the performance is smooth for me consistently both on my desktop and mobile.
The general look and feel of the website is something that, I think, makes a difference and really makes the gaming experience more enjoyable.
I couldn't agree more that it's both very important and a bit lacking in many Bitcoin dice casinos.
Thanks for the suggestions. I will definitely check them all out and add them to my list. I haven't had a chance to try the Monopoly Live game yet. This I gotta see.
I suggest you try it with a little capital so that if something happens that you don't want then you will not regret it because it uses a lot of money. after you find the best place then you can use a lot of money to gamble casino.
That's really good advice. It's always best to bet conservatively when trying a new game.
Just a suggestion since you have too many options, I think it's best to let the voters to have many options as well even for 3-5 selections. I think you can still edit that (correct me if I'm wrong).
`
It's a valid suggestion (other people have asked for it as well), but I can't seem to be able to edit it now.
I'm planning on
compiling all people's notes about the different casinos after the poll ends, alongside with the poll's results, and then sharing them here. That way, if someone mentions a casino but didn't vote for it, it can still get mentioned, as well as the reasons why it's good (or bad).
I hope that helps!
The problem here is this is done without any kind of comparison to other dice sites and them being a user who don't have any issue with their dice site doesn't mean that it is better compared to others. If we want a unbiased ranking it should be done in comparison with all the dice site not only from the users using 1 site.
I see your point, but any sort of 'top something' list always has an element of subjectivity to it. Even if you try 20 different websites for a long time, you will always have some you like more or less, and the reasons why you like them might be entirely different than someone else's.
I don't think that subjective opinions are less valuable because of that, however. Just that you should always take them with a grain of salt.
All in all, I think if several people like one or two casinos above all others, they must be doing something right. Similarly, if many people have the same issue with a casino, it's likely something is wrong with it.
In any case, that's why there are casino review websites, like ours. We test all the casinos we list, so it's not just the opinion of someone who only plays at that one website. And while I will take the opinions on this thread into consideration when re-doing our list of best dice casinos, they won't be the only thing used to rate them.
If you're interested in knowing what criteria we use, you can have a look at my initial post here, which lists them. Some are subjective, but others aren't - for instance, it isn't subjective if a casino has a license, or if it has withdrawal fees, what is subjective is how much that matters.
