Topic: 🔥🎲Tower.bet 🎲🔥 New Platform arrived 🎲Crash 🎲 HiLo 🎲 Wheel 🎲Contests 🎲 - page 41. (Read 11003 times)

congrats with a new game,
you guys are growing say hi to your designer, I see that Moneybox is available again,
and the main principle just to hit 50x colour, will it be like permanent or expired someday?

Tower.bet operates illegal without valid license because the usage right contract between Sabant N.V. and 8048/JAZ license holder is invalid because the key terms and conditions "under its supervision and responsibility" are intentionally not fulfilled!

thank you, yes, by the way I've noticed that some new stuffs appeared on your website, didn't try to pour a rain. Do I  get money random while playing?

Visit us again, we have just launched new game!

We've been busy!

New Game - Introducing Cogwheel
Are you classy enough for Roulette? Try our twist on roulette in Cogwheel!


Meet Rainold - the citizen of the Tower
Missed something in chat? Maybe rainbot? Well not anymore! Rainold will take care of your constant rains and you can make your owns!

For the smartest - FAQ
FAQ with the information you may need to become fellow Towerian!

My Bets
Now the list of your bets is conveniently located next to the Active Bets. We know you missed it.

Player Profile
Your beautiful profile with those amazing stats and XP has just arrived, click on anyone's username to see others too!

Visual Improvements
For higher convenience the Balance is now displayed right above game field and other thoughtful touches, e.g deposit - your favorite action button - is now actually visible and you don't need to search for it, has been done. To claim TWG just switch to the TWG balance.

Stay tunes and good luck!

I've  tried both of your games Hi-lo and Crash, Crash is cool in fact,
maybe you will release some new similar games but with new features?

We plan to run signature campaign once the game is open to public. Running the sig campaign while game is invite-only is not very fair for potential new players.


No, of course we don't "evaluate" players who join, that would be quite arrogant from our side:) When we say quality over quantity, we mean that, e.g. we see new player registered, made a deposit, played and then left and did not come back for over X days - so we assume he did not like something and since amount of players either from DuckDice or joined by invite we always have a communication channel with that player, so we can go and ask him directly about his experience and hope that player will share it with us. Or other scenario, when we check hit maps and notice "unexpected" behavior we can conduct a survey. We have BI software of course, but talking to players was always important part of our development - so not qualitative players (we love them all), but more quality in how we look into our players game patterns to understanding their needs.
And since our players are either old DuckDice community members or people who explicitly asked to join they more likely to share their feedback and we know our community so we also we can understand the behaviour of players (and hopefully we will understand it correct  )
This may sound like a long blah-blah but hope you got the point.

I don't think that his statement regards to the "quality" (in terms of quality assurance capabilities eg.) of the users itself.
What the invity only approach brings is, that they are able to upgrade the backend (servers, databases, bandwidth for example) in babysteps. This may lead to a better user experience because downtimes are lower, the site itself is more responsive, bugs can be fixed faster due to lesser impacts of new software rollouts etc.

So the site itself is (or may be because we don't know ) of higher quality if there are less users allowed to access the site in early stages of the development. Anyways, its easy to get an invite link and if it helps them to deliver a stable and working product to the masses I am fine with it as long as they don't extend the invite only phase for too long.

Regarding your invite-only rule. You wrote quality over quantity, but how can you ensure that the people who registered on your site before the deadline date, or those who were given an invite have the needed quality to test the site properly? Do you conduct any research on the people who apply and send invites based on your findings?
Because if you don't, you can't ensure that quality over quantity standards are met.

I am sure it will. Its always better to not being too hasty when launching a new site. If the first impression of a new player is bad (site is too slow, doesn't work properly, ...) he/she will likely never come back and give you a second chance.


Do you consider hosting a signature campaign here at bitcointalk? In my opinion its a very good way to attract new players and get awareness. There are already a lot of gambling-oriented signature campaigns out there, seems to be kinda "state-of-the-art"

We love BitKong and Luckydice designs, and we working hard to maintain the trend for good quality UI/UX games

Unfortunately affiliate program is not yet released. It is still in the development but in the high priority.

Just short milestones on what you can expect to be released soon: new game, rainbot, one more game,  affiliate program. The estimate here is about a month.


You may be right,  but we believe this will help us to make product of a higher quality and give attention to every single player. We understand that once open for a public we will need to work extra to convince all you to join and try the game But we still want to take our time to design the game world which we (tower.bet team) and players will like.

Also, Tower.bet is a sister project of DuckDice, so we have both expertise (maybe not so much on running bitcointalk threads, lol) and resources.

Yes, thank you, will add the "supported environments" article!

I like the UI and the designs also, but what concerns me is the invite-only access to the platform. Isn't there enough competition out there, why would players go through the extra hurdle of messaging you to get the invite link if all they want to do is try it out and see if that's something they like or not.

Having said this, do you think this is then likely to change in the future? I mean the crypt world is moving towards autonomy & accessibility and if you can't tick at least one of these boxes then what are you doing with your investments? Anyways, don't take it personally, I'm just trying to make sense of it!

Peace,
Josephdd1

Looks like a fun game, has a nice BitKong like aesthetic to it—definitely a good thing.

Do have an affiliate program? I scanned through the site but couldn't find anything.

I ve tested the site both on a Galaxy S7 and a Galaxy S10, didn't encounter any problem so far. Maybe you should state in the FAQs that the site is optimized for Androids 7+ or so to prevent people from complaining that the site loads too slow on their Huawei P5 or so

Anyways, the game performs really well both on mobile and desktop!

ehmm, the game is invite-only by design, and we have plenty of senior developers, thank you:)
Can you please tell what android do you have? The game is mobile friendly, and we test it both in browserstack and on real devices (few flagships), but with that many Android devices you can never be sure.

Looks like a great project here, will check out the discord too!

We are not really attracting any whales atm, this is just a tiny contest for our online players. There were about 10 participants and all had fun.
Of course we are not trying to target big players with these races, just taking care of those who visit us daily.

Did you even read what was posted a few posting before yours? There are valid reasons why the access is still limited, I am sure the devs know how to program such a feature ... Just scroll up.

Also, the user @tower.bet mentioned that they are currently adding new games to the site ...

$50 prizepool for a wagering contest? Sorry, but dont you think it is too low, I wonder how this wagering contest can attract players especially whales? I do not mean to complain but just saying my opinion.
Although it can be increased, it should be clear how much it will be increased. Will it be based on how many participants or will it be based on how much profit you make during the race?
The separated leaderboard is also not good IMO, add a leaderboard on the site should not be a big deal as most other sites has it.