Topic: Tracking down stolen Bitcoins (Read 1826 times)
It doesnt hurt to hold onto any altcoin especially if its an airdrop.Marinecoin is a good one to consider. Community backed crypto currency. Marinecoin has a low energy profile. It has the potential to revolutionize things. Visit them before the airdrop ends 20000 for proof of promotion. A time tested block chain with fas trnasaction. Artificial intelligence support, with easy to impliment IoT. As a ressiult it will be dev-less.marineco.in/ico marineco.in to register.
I see altcoins eventually shaking loose from BTC as utility coins become more common. IoT applications in particular I think will create and hold value. Value is what it takes for successful coins. Machine to machine transactions are required at high speeds and low cost because of the shear volume of transactions. One that I have been getting as many of as possible is Marinecoin, MTC. They are using time dilution technology so everyone gets a fair shot at many MTC if they are willing to do some work and help promote their current ico. Zero fees and speeds 500 X BTC make MTC perfect for iot applications. Find out more here marineco/in
Blocks doesnt permit tracking facility as far as i know they just provide the end-to-end motility
Sometimes its pretty hard to track them down while its even harder to prove that the coins are really yours. You then might needs witnesses
well this is one of the weaknesses of the digital currency or can also be called bitcoin one of them, the lack of digital currencies like this easy to be stolen, and when lost who will be responsible, yes only the owner of the account and usually if the account has been hacked by others then our bitcoin will disappear as well and can not be restored
I would argue that this is not the weakness. This is how any trust-less flat structure should function. In such structure you can't really offload your responsibility to higher authority so you have to assume it as is and pay dearly for your fails because there is nobody to argue about them. It may seem harsh but that gives you an idea of how higher authority feels when making decisions.
well this is one of the weaknesses of the digital currency or can also be called bitcoin one of them, the lack of digital currencies like this easy to be stolen, and when lost who will be responsible, yes only the owner of the account and usually if the account has been hacked by others then our bitcoin will disappear as well and can not be restored
Marinecoin - I introduce this project: https:// mari neco.in . it’s really good.You can earn up to 20,000 MTC HERE https:// mari neco.in/ico/.Just for people who came early. Hurry up to get this great coin!!!the marinecoin project!!! i really like this. They are fast proof time and blockchain development.You can sign up here https:// mari neco.in/ico and do some steps to get 20000 MTC free. it’s great.Don’t hesitate with this chance.in Internet Artificial Intelligence (AI) of Things (IoT). time dilution technology. time dilution technology - artificial intelligence - self sustaining - community - fair distribution - iot.In my opinion, MTC will success in the future. It is time tested fast and developed blockchain with quickly growing community, artificial intelligence and many other features in itself. They give 20000MTC free for you when you sign up the link: "https:// mari neco.in/ico" and follow steps.
I think this is were people will see the need for some sort of centralization or "policing" of transactions/records. Cryptocurrencies, Blockchain technology,etc are all excellent in an Utopian world where people are all honest and law abiding. But in reality it is not the case, a person or a group with ulterior intent would surely put time to come up with a fool proof plan to steal and eventually get the cryptos converted to fiat. They might even go to the extent of faking their identification if we think that exchanges provide some sort of security! That's why I believe some regulating body or bodies are needed for cryptocurrencies to get mass adopted.
It's interesting how quickly history disappears in cryptocurrency land 
See, this was actually tried on a significant scale back in the old days. A popular margin trading site - Bitcoinica - was hacked, and as a result, MtGOX (the #1 exchange at the time) instituted a policy that they wouldn't accept deposits of the "tainted" coins stolen by the hacker - and would put a temporary AML freeze on any account that tried - under the theory that such a person might have been responsible (or know who's responsible) for the hack.
Example of a thread about this.
People quickly realized, within a few weeks, that this was not a tenable way forward, b/c overwhelmingly the people affected by the policy were randos who had nothing to do with the hack - they'd just been paid coins that, at some point in the past, had been spent by the hacker.
When the founder of Bitcoinica asked MtGOX to stop this policy, they did, and since then nobody has seriously tried it again.
See, this was actually tried on a significant scale back in the old days. A popular margin trading site - Bitcoinica - was hacked, and as a result, MtGOX (the #1 exchange at the time) instituted a policy that they wouldn't accept deposits of the "tainted" coins stolen by the hacker - and would put a temporary AML freeze on any account that tried - under the theory that such a person might have been responsible (or know who's responsible) for the hack.
Example of a thread about this.
People quickly realized, within a few weeks, that this was not a tenable way forward, b/c overwhelmingly the people affected by the policy were randos who had nothing to do with the hack - they'd just been paid coins that, at some point in the past, had been spent by the hacker.
When the founder of Bitcoinica asked MtGOX to stop this policy, they did, and since then nobody has seriously tried it again.
Perfect example of how that practice of exchanges having to play the "regulators" as well as providing a service is not really feasible. If exchanges didn't have the ability to be able to check the "taint" on the coins then it wouldn't really matter. It's still a good thing to have KYC in terms of knowing who is buying and selling coins for tax purposes, but being able to track coins from 5 wallets ago or so that came from a criminals wallet is bad for the global (crypto) economy and end up hurting people who are not doing anything wrong at all.
There are a lot of stories of stolen bitcoins from hacked websites or fooled people.
I was wondering, since all transactions are in blockchain, is it technically possible to make blacklist of wallets where stolen funds where transferred (by claims of victims) to track transfers of those funds and report when the owner can be identified (for example when some goods where bought and delivery address is known)?
Or perhaps just block those blacklisted wallets and don't support them on the network (bitcoin) level?
I was wondering, since all transactions are in blockchain, is it technically possible to make blacklist of wallets where stolen funds where transferred (by claims of victims) to track transfers of those funds and report when the owner can be identified (for example when some goods where bought and delivery address is known)?
Or perhaps just block those blacklisted wallets and don't support them on the network (bitcoin) level?
It is possible to follow the coins, but it is impossible to know if/when the owner has changed. You cannot know if a transfer is from one owners address to another address of his, or if the new address belongs to a new owner.
Even proving that the coins belonged to you could sometimes be difficult
On the other hand. Now all? exchanges require identification for buying or selling large amounts of bitcoins. If the thief sells the stolen coins through an exchange then he can be identified.
Blacklisting coins from the blockchain is impossible. Who could do that? Bitcoin is a decentralized system after all...
I feel like this will become the eventual downfall of "open ledger" and non opaque blockchains like Bitcoin and the other countless clones of it. Major exchange sites will begin to realize just how much liability this puts on them because they absolutely 100% have to report the criminals and have to keep track of these "tainted" coins, and if not then it will look bad on them and will be penalized in some sort of way.
If you have coins that successfully hides all of this meta info from the coins they are exchanging for customers, then that will therefore reduce that liability and also makes exchanges more willing to accept these type of coins. ... At least that's how I see it eventually playing out unless there is some weird law that passes where exchanges are forced to only accept open ledger coins.
It is possible and service such as http://chainalysis.com/ already do this. Some government even use chainalysis services to track down stolen/tainted bitcoin and it's really effective when government force exchanges/services to cooperate with chainalysis to see if user attempt to deposit bitcoin to the exchange/services.
But it's not really effective if the user use bitcoin mixer or decentralized exchange to get away.
But i strongly disagree with the idea of blocking/deny stolen/tainted bitcoin on bitcoin network since it could lead to centralization (such controlled miner/nodes by government will vote to block TXO which doesn't cooperate with government).
But it's not really effective if the user use bitcoin mixer or decentralized exchange to get away.
But i strongly disagree with the idea of blocking/deny stolen/tainted bitcoin on bitcoin network since it could lead to centralization (such controlled miner/nodes by government will vote to block TXO which doesn't cooperate with government).
Exactly cases of stolen Bitcoins or those related to some illegal/shady activities are the good example how regulation can help and why exchanges need to obey some strict rules opposed by governments. It's for the benefit of users and not to harm Bitcoin. And we are against regulation we forget that everyone of us could became a victim of cryptocurrencies illegal activities too.
But I agree that blocking suspicious transactions is not the best idea, it could make more harm than good.
Right now is too many people are bad, or Somebody has motive to be doing like that to track someone if you are giving a chance to tracking you and lead to stolen you bitcoin in your wallet.The best thing is you cannot give your personal information about your wallet to someone or even a close friend and be sure that your password is very unique.you can get more wallet to divided your coin if ever someone hack your wallet small amount will lose.
It's interesting how quickly history disappears in cryptocurrency land
See, this was actually tried on a significant scale back in the old days. A popular margin trading site - Bitcoinica - was hacked, and as a result, MtGOX (the #1 exchange at the time) instituted a policy that they wouldn't accept deposits of the "tainted" coins stolen by the hacker - and would put a temporary AML freeze on any account that tried - under the theory that such a person might have been responsible (or know who's responsible) for the hack.
Example of a thread about this.
People quickly realized, within a few weeks, that this was not a tenable way forward, b/c overwhelmingly the people affected by the policy were randos who had nothing to do with the hack - they'd just been paid coins that, at some point in the past, had been spent by the hacker.
When the founder of Bitcoinica asked MtGOX to stop this policy, they did, and since then nobody has seriously tried it again.
See, this was actually tried on a significant scale back in the old days. A popular margin trading site - Bitcoinica - was hacked, and as a result, MtGOX (the #1 exchange at the time) instituted a policy that they wouldn't accept deposits of the "tainted" coins stolen by the hacker - and would put a temporary AML freeze on any account that tried - under the theory that such a person might have been responsible (or know who's responsible) for the hack.
Example of a thread about this.
People quickly realized, within a few weeks, that this was not a tenable way forward, b/c overwhelmingly the people affected by the policy were randos who had nothing to do with the hack - they'd just been paid coins that, at some point in the past, had been spent by the hacker.
When the founder of Bitcoinica asked MtGOX to stop this policy, they did, and since then nobody has seriously tried it again.
It's possible to track down stolen bitcoins by following the input/output trail, but they will only help if they end up depositing to a known address where you could potentially gather their KYC information. If they end up trading for something such as monero, then the trail will probably be irreversibly broken.
Since it back and forth post ...
can I add
Stolen Bitcoin Tracing - Computerphile
https://youtu.be/UlLN0QERWBs
It's possible to track down stolen bitcoins by following the input/output trail, but they will only help if they end up depositing to a known address where you could potentially gather their KYC information. If they end up trading for something such as monero, then the trail will probably be irreversibly broken.
Bitcoin has the only features that if once the funds are transferred by the user than it is unable to refund unless the recive= send it back to the wallet and there is no other development med like in which we can beak the transaction and track the stolen coins all around the world. Thier are many people using multiple wallets to make their crypto management more simple.
Remember asking for more regulation will always bring unintended consequences so I believe what you are asking for could possibly be put in to effect but the consequences of such an action would basically kill what is great about bitcoin in the first place. Never give up your freedom in order to attain complete security.
There are lots of stories for stolen bitcoin. We must have protect our points from the the hackers.There are many IT developer can hack your account and take your all the bitcoins from your wallet if your technology not be strong. And also you can't detect the thieves.
To track the stolen bitcoin? of course we as bitcoin users ask how to track the stolen bitcoin? or is there any other way about it? because we are afraid the bitcoin we get is painstakingly stolen by the unaccountable person.
There are a lot of stories of stolen bitcoins from hacked websites or fooled people.
I was wondering, since all transactions are in blockchain, is it technically possible to make blacklist of wallets where stolen funds where transferred (by claims of victims) to track transfers of those funds and report when the owner can be identified (for example when some goods where bought and delivery address is known)?
Or perhaps just block those blacklisted wallets and don't support them on the network (bitcoin) level?
Sure you can make a list of the addresses that have stolen your funds, but you have to know that bitcoin addresses are dynamite means they change after every transaction, so tracking the stolen funds is going to take a lot of work, plus what is the purpose of this list, it is not like you can do anything about it, the best thing you can do is ask why the funds got stolen in the first place and learn from that.I was wondering, since all transactions are in blockchain, is it technically possible to make blacklist of wallets where stolen funds where transferred (by claims of victims) to track transfers of those funds and report when the owner can be identified (for example when some goods where bought and delivery address is known)?
Or perhaps just block those blacklisted wallets and don't support them on the network (bitcoin) level?
Jump to: