If you want a nice looking and easy to use interface, then go for it, but if you want to have any real control over your keys and addresses, then Electrum is the way to go.
Lol, it does look nice, but that's about about as deep as it goes. Electrum FTW.
There's no reason Trezor couldn't introduce all these features and just hide them behind a "Show advanced options" tick box somewhere to keep the basic interface cleaner for less technical users.
I agree with that, but to what end? Don't get me wrong, coin controls are a must for privacy and safety, and it is disappointing that Trezor doesn't include the features in their software. But I think from their marketing perspective, their goal is to attract as many new users as possible. Their target audience are those who are likely uninitiated in crypto, and less technical overall. They probably concluded that what's best for business is a simple, clean interface without a lot of technical options destined to keep their customer service personnel working overtime.
And lets face it, they'll never include a command line interface, encryption/verification capabilities, network/proxy controls... Even if they added coin controls (which again, I believe they should) I would probably still use Electrum. Those of us who are more technically capable already have plenty of tools at our disposal, and I think Trezor's marketing department knows that.
