Topic: Troll takeover? (Read 2376 times)

...and some times in not so extreme cases:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/staff-hypocrisy-and-selective-enforcement-of-rules-853522
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=858730.0;all
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=718663.0;all

It's more of a scam artist takeover than simly a troll takeover.

You were asking for evidence?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/staffmoderator-double-standards-and-selective-enforcment-of-rules-917438

This is itself a troll post.

That's why it's in the Meta sub.

So this is becoming one of those threads where someone fights Vod again?
No, staff doesn't clearly moderate the trust system. Unless you can find evidence to back up your claims, you should keep quiet.

Is this another one of those insults you didn't make?

I was going to say its a surge of interest because of Bitstamp crashing combined with some people looking at it in the new year
But I like the beartard argument myself

Yep - I'm with hilarious on this one.  You are a nut job.   

Lol single incident. Thats funny. You don't even have a single complaint let alone a single incident. You have dozens of complaints, and lots of feedback that clearly doesn't follow the guidelines for leaving negative trust. I however have left about 6 total negative feed backs since the trust system existed. It would take a while to count how many you have left. Your situation and my situation are in no way the same, other than the fact that I was punished for something you do quite regularly. Even after stacks of incidents, many of which you refuse to cooperate in, you are not punished or even publicly redressed by the staff.

One day I may get my single incident and get removed like you were.  But so far I'm smart enough to do the right thing.   

No, clearly it is because no action is ever taken against you that it is clear they support you, while others are thrown under a bus after a single incident. Keep practicing those mental gymnastics, maybe some day you will get the medal.

No tool is perfect, and I reckon a lot comes down to the skill / instinct / talent or whatever of the user. I have found https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ryans-log-672187 useful. And yes, I do think they have been remotely right. Not everytime, but hey... You don't have to win every single trade as long your bottom line ends up positive. If you can't deal with loss then trading is not for you. Even the best make bad trades too.

So because the moderators here don't openly criticize me, you think that means they support me?

So because I didn't openly criticize you that means I supported you? No not really. In fact I told explicitly you that I thought your behavior was becoming excessive, but instead of controlling yourself you became even worse.

It's funny you post that now, because you used to agree with my position when you were in the DefaultTrust.   

It is funny you say that now, because at the time you seemed to agree with my position. Funny how that changed once I started openly criticizing your own trust practices.

Quote from: TECSHARE on November 06, 2014, 09:47:05 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on November 06, 2014, 08:42:23 AM
these:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/land-mines-vietnam-era-warning-sign-red-enamel-metal-tell-the-world-u-mines-32469
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--844619
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9438300
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9438146

This has nothing to do with risk. It is the principal of the matter. He shouldn't have been doing what he was doing in the first place. He was provided many opportunities to leave or diffuse the situation, instead every step of the way he chose to escalate. I have already taken several steps to deescalate this situation. He has taken none.

I feel I have zero obligations to compromise with him in any way, especially since he has demonstrated he is unwilling to do so when offered. Instead he opted to dictate to me what he wants done. He has no leverage at this point. Regardless of this I am again stating I am open to deleting his feedback if he removes his posts in my op, locks this thread, and deletes me from his signature. He can learn to act like an adult or live with my feedback. Its his choice.

VOD: That's fair.  I would react the same way.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9453332

VODS edited post:
You decided to retract your outright accusations that I am lying by editing your post. I suppose that is a good step. As far as my "responsibilities", no one ever asked me to agree to any responsibilities or explained anything to me, I was just added one day because I take extraneous efforts to make sure everyone I deal with is treated fairly, but feel free to edit the narrative any way you like after the fact.

Jesus Christ  . Sigh. It's embarrassing watching you continually spout this nonsense. I cannot believe you actually think the trolls here are a byproduct of staff 'moderating' trust (which they are not). I'm done with you now. You are clearly not rational.


People can try make predictions based on charts or other such 'tools' but have any of them ever been even remotely right? I haven't seen any.


It's a bingo (but now yet another thread derailed by Techshare).

No they don't.  You're just upset you couldn't handle the responsibilities of DefaultTrust.   

They like to tell everyone they don't moderate trust but they clearly do. They do so by threatening removal of trust from individuals lower in their trust tree in order to extort action from lower level trusted users. If you really care about my personal involvement in the issue you can read about it here:  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9495269

Staff don't moderate trust.  TECSHARE hopes that if he lies enough times, some people will start to believe him and propagate the lie further.