Topic: Trump Demands All Jan 6 Detainees Be Released From Prison After Tucker Carlson.. (Read 941 times)

Trump changed his hairstyle by the way, super, this is a hint of change

Here's proof that January 6 was an inside job, and that essentially all the J6 victims are innocent.


J6 was an inside job - Here's Kash Patel with Tim Pool in explosive clip

---

https://rumble.com/v5zn13n-j6-was-an-inside-job-heres-kash-patel-with-tim-pool-in-explosive-clip.html?e9s=src_v1_upp
Kash Patel: once they admit there was undercover informants at the capital, their own narrative is defeated because it takes six months to place an undercover informant in with the proud boys.
...

---

Gradually it comes out that Trump asked for troops at the Capitol, so that things would be safe on January 6.


Bombshell Transcripts Reveal Trump, in Fact, Ordered National Guard for January 6th — General Milley Confirms Trump Urges Top Pentagon Officials to Deploy’ Guard, or Soldiers, Active Duty Soldiers’

---

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/bombshell-transcripts-trump-fact-ordered-national-guard-january/
A groundbreaking report from Steve Baker has unveiled crucial transcripts proving that President Donald Trump did indeed request National Guard deployment to ensure a peaceful protest on January 6th, 2021.

These newly surfaced transcripts, which were previously concealed, reveal the truth that many in the mainstream media have ignored.

According to the documents, General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, confirmed that President Trump expressed concern about the potential for unrest and proactively ordered the necessary precautions.

On January 3, 2021, just three days before the protest, General Milley recalled the president saying, "Hey, look at this. There's going to be a large amount of protesters here on the 6th. Make sure that you have sufficient National Guard or Soldiers to make sure it's a safe event."

Trump reportedly added, "I don't care if you use Guard, or Soldiers, active duty Soldiers, do whatever you have to do. Just make sure it's safe."

These damning revelations fly in the face of the narrative propagated by the mainstream media and Democrats who have continuously blamed Trump for the chaos that unfolded on January 6th. The president's clear directive to deploy the National Guard days before the event highlights his intentions to maintain law and order during the protest.

The transcripts also reveal that other Pentagon officials failed to act on Trump's requests. Chief Steven Sund of the U.S. Capitol Police made an urgent plea for the National Guard on January 6th.

However, according to Sund, the Secretary of the Army's representative denied the request, citing concerns about the "optics" of having National Guard troops stationed at the Capitol. This hesitation contributed to the delayed response, exacerbating the situation.

Further complicating matters, Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller acknowledged that Trump had commented on the need for 10,000 troops to ensure security. However, Miller dismissed the president's request as mere "banter."
...

---

Please provide the link in the pictures.

The Health Ranger thanks you in advance.


      

Wow look at that I can buy 2 lbs of no salt added mac and cheese plus a half pound of salt for $65.  All health ranger approved! What a deal!

^^^ Oh that's right. I forgot to address the part that you can't see the proof. But that's normal for you.

They wanted people to think a new video was just released that proved DC police planted a pipe bomb to get as many clicks as possible.  Doesn't matter that the video was not new and did not prove that DC police planted a pipe bomb since the goal was the same as any link to a Mike Adams site, to get you to look at this garbage:

You just don't get it, do you. When the video first came out, it WAS an 'EXPLOSIVE: New video...'. Just because somebody decided to re-post the article info, and the video, doesn't mean it's new now. Didn't you even see the part where I said that the video has been around for a while? How in the world dense can you get? Don't answer that. We've seen enough density already.

Gee I wonder why they would post an article with headline EXPLOSIV: New video shows.... for a video that came out 6 months ago and act like the cop walking down the side walk and not planting a bomb is proof that he planted the bomb.

Your brain is what's been supressed.

This video has been around for a while. Is it fake, inconclusive, or suppressed?


EXPLOSIVE: New video shows DC police PLANTED J6 pipe bomb that FBI blamed on conservative extremists

---

https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-08-20-video-dc-police-planted-j6-pipe-bomb.html
Newly released CCTV surveillance video blows a hole in the claim that conservative extremists were responsible for planting at least one of the pipe bombs that went off at DNC and RNC headquarters during the Jan. 6, 2021, "insurrection."

Shortly after 12:51 pm the day of, a Washington, D.C. police SUV appeared next to a park bench where one of the bombs was later discovered. A man is seen exiting the SUV with a bag before pointing to the bench and pulling up his right coat collar to disguise his face from surveillance cameras – watch below.

Less than 15 minutes later at 1:05 pm, the pipe bomb was discovered by a plainclothes officer from the Capitol Police.

(Related: Check out our earlier report about the faux "investigation" into the pipe bombs by the FBI.)

Political dinosaurs behind pipe bomb false flag

Now that we know local law enforcement was behind the planting of this pipe bomb, the question remains as to why it was planted in the first place. Was it a threat against those who wanted the January 6 certification of electors challenged?

Many of the usual suspects in Congress were apparently behind this, including Nancy Pelosi, Kevin McCarthy, Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell and Mike Pence. These political dinosaurs did not want Americans learning the truth that 85 million Americans did not vote for Joe Biden as the official tally suggests.
...

---

Trump's demands have become justified, even though they might have been all along. This is older news, but here it is again:


MASSIVE WIN FOR THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.

---

https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1823475092845998390
Judge Ho has ruled that the "geofencing" surveillance method used to track J6ers and other Americans is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

The federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held in its opinion that geofence warrants are “categorically prohibited by the Fourth Amendment."

The court's opinion forbade the “general, exploratory rummaging” that the nation's Founders intended to outlaw.

EFF pointed out that under the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Carpenter v. United States, "individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the location data implicated by geofence warrants."

Second, EFF noted that the court found that "even though investigators seek warrants for geofence location data, these searches are inherently unconstitutional." As the court pointed out, geofence warrants require a provider (almost always Google) to search “the entirety” of its location data “while law enforcement officials have no idea who they are looking for, or whether the search will even turn up a result.”

This is a major blow for Americans' constitutional rights against increasing encroachment of the surveillance state.
...

---

^^^ The point is MONEY. And Trump's $billions aren't nearly enough to fight those who use the Federal Reserve Bank multiplied money system against him.

If you have the money of the Fed, you can buy anything. The only thing you need to be careful of is that you don't alienate the sheep against you. Why? They might see to it that the Fed is collapsed one way or another. However, the success of big money has made most of the Elite think that they are beyond failure.

Even if the sheep can't collapse the Fed directly, there is a Higher Power Who is using the Fed against the Fed. He will collapse it in due time. Money won't be worth anything then. And that means that the sheep will have success even if Trump and his people don't.

I don't know about what you may think of this topic, but to me it is remarkable how the life of two people: Steve Bannon and Rudy Goulliani have become a mess because they decided to hand out with Trump, it is as if getting involved with him gets one more in trouble than haging out with the average rich person.
Even executives of Fox "News" had to pay the price of playing into the narrative of Trump's big lie, literally.
It makes me wonder whether that man can actually feel empathy for others or he is actually as pathological as come people claim he is.

For example, when his home in Mar-a-lago was first raided by the FBI, I recall there was some guy how believed Trump's narrative of persecution and actually attacked ones of the FBI's headquarters, he ended up dead in a corn field. Of something like that happened because of my narrative (if I was politician) I would feel guilty beyond belief, I don't know how I could sleep at nights of I knew someone is death for stuff I merely said.  

For sure he will not pardon anyone unless he believes he will personally benefit from it somehow.

Case in point: Steve Bannon was indicted for being involved with a scam charity to "build the wall" along with a couple other guys.  Trump pardoned Steve Bannon, and Bannon went on to promote Trumps agenda for the next 4 years on his podcast that has reached 10's of millions of listeners.  The other guys that were part of the same indictment didn't get a pardon and are now 2 years into their 36 and 51 month prison sentences.  (Steve Bannon is also in prison for other reasons right now, and he was charged in NY State for the same crimes that Trump pardoned him for on federal charges, that trial starts next month I think?)

I think most likely he will pardon all or most of the J6 terrorists (likely after using them to leverage something more for himself), because he will view it beneficial to have his followers believe that he has all of their backs, and having an on call violent mob on demand translates directly to power that he doesn't even need to use to realize.

It's also possible that if the time ever comes, he will calculate that pardoning them will do more damage than good politically.  Then we might see him play the "my taxes are under audit, i'll release them soon" card.

All we know for sure is they won't be released or not released based on what Trump believes is morally right or wrong, and also BADecker will believe whatever nonsense reason Trump gives.

Quite honestly I wonder whether Trump actually cares for his followers and would get out his way to pardon those who committed federal crimes in the grounds of the capitol, to be honest. And to be frank, I would not be surprised if Trump suddenly decided (after becoming president again) not to pardon those who have been convicted. Why?
Because he would have nothing else to earn for it... the promise of a massive pardon to those people certainly id good for him to fire up his base and make them to vote for him, but after the election is won and he has other things to worry about, it is in the end up to him to tske the first step.

I wonder what people like BD would think of Trump in the case he fails to pardon those people in a federal prison. would there be any justification at all at that point or not?

^^^ It's rather humorous watching you continue to fight against US law so hard.

It's fun watching you squirm when asked a pretty simple and direct question and at the same time sad and scary to see the power Trump has over his cult of followers.

I'm sure it's not so obvious to you, but it's a fairly straight forward question for anyone that's able and willing to think for themselves and trust their own personal code of ethics when it comes to what is right and wrong.

But if you're a member of a cult, you're own personal code of ethics goes out the window.  The difference between right and wrong is not defined by any ethical or logical thought process or even facts or reality, it's defined entirely by the leader.  If the leader does it, it becomes by definition "right".  Disagreeing with the leader is not an option.  But what happens when you ask a member of a cult their opinion of a decision their leader hasn't made yet?  They squirm.  They are no longer able to think independently of the cult, so if they don't know what their leader will decide, then they don't know the answer as illustrated every time you respond to my simple direct questions that are easily answered by anyone that isn't a member of the Trump cult.  The response will always be either some form of "whatever Trump does is the right thing" or the actual question will be avoided and instead a bunch of ambiguous political rhetoric will be parroted back as if they were a talking head working for the Trump campaign on cable news.

I trust that Trump will do what is LEGAL and RIGHT.

Again, while Trump might free ALL Jan 6 detainees and imprisoned people, what he will also be doing is freeing all Americans from oppression by the Deep State. If the Deep State hadn't set up the oppression that they have, there wouldn't have been any Jan 6.

The idea of damage and crimes in what is called the Jan 6 Capitol riots, was a promotion by the Deep State Biden team both in setting up the circumstances for it, and then by having operatives in the crowd to encourage it.

The Deep State operatives were never brought to trial, but the Biden team is being adjudicated against by the people who are electing Trump.

Do you think Trump should pardon this guy, who was recorded by dozens of people committing each of the crimes he was convicted of:

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/north-carolina-man-sentenced-assaulting-officers-during-jan-6-capitol-breach

You and Vod seem to have missed that I said, "If somebody does damage, make him pay for the damage." If the crimes were there, make them pay for the crime, not for some greatly exaggerated crime.