Topic: Trump or Clinton: Does it matter? (Read 1929 times)

Okay? So go back plotting your sdr take over, it ain't gonna happen... But maybe you are so uninformed that you don't know who is the woman on the picture? It wouldn't surprise me from someone who wrote what you did.

Then why exactly general media presents Trump as WW3 propagator? I got the impression that he is presented as bad guy and potential catalyst of new conflicts.
While Hillary is calm and rational person who will rather negotiate and try to find a peaceful solution - is not that right?

Of those options I definitely like the second one.

He is the king of debt only when he has the US Government to bail him out and take his side, and he owes his success to exploiting legal loopholes which he won't be able to benefit from when trying to apply the same techniques to resolving America's debts with China and Russia

One of the biggest thing I'm looking forward to in a Trump presidency is to 'go bankrupt.'  I very much liked it when the guy say 'I the king of debt.  I love debt.  I love to play with it.'

My opinion is that if entity A defaults on a debt to entity B, it is more entity B's fault than the other way around.  This is the reason I have very little sympathy for those who lost money/Bitcoin in the myriad of instances when an exchange folded up and appropriated their funds.  (BTW, Mt. Gox still owes me a $5k wire and I consider it 100% 'my fault' since I made the calculations about how much to allow them to owe me.)

Back to the U.S., nobody for the last 20 years should have expected to get their money back when they bought our debt, and certainly noone as sophisticated as, say, China.  They were strong-armed into buying our debt for other benefits (e.g., monetary flows to build their industry, oil flows to keep it running, etc.)

I would say that we'll have a 'bankruptcy' (as well as more war) under Clinton or her replacement as well but in that case our resources will be offered by the well connected to the creditors.  This will include our infrastructure, our in-the-ground mineral reserves, and even the private property of innocent U.S. citizens.  This is more-or-less what happened as the Soviet Union fell apart.  Many of the resource grabs (e.g., the EPA's WOTUS rule) look a lot to me like a setup for just this eventuality.

Clinton = WW3
Trump = US bankrupt and no WW3

Clinton would kill all people on the world you saw her talking BS on Kadafi with smile.
Trump can is buisness man so i don't know if all his BS is just true or BS and when he comes to be president all is BS
and nothing really happened becouse people in charge are BANKS at end.

Clinton is sly, lies to the public, is racist and a pseudo-feminist. She really can ruin America.
Trump is sly, but tells his plans boldly. He is racist too. Both are wasting Government's money.
Are americans fool? Who made the comedians popular?
One argues over 10k emails, one argues over his company's loans

Sending a message to all the little girls around the globe: If you are ever molested by Bill Clinton, he will go free!**

**If not, Hillary will defend him in court and let 'im walk free, then brag about it in her books

More lessons from Clinton to little girls:

* If you have close ties with Wall Street executives and a track record of corruption, you too, can become a President some day, while facing FBI Investigation!

* One day you, too, can become President, if my foreign policy hasn't bombed you to pieces already though

* Accused of a crime? Call everybody a sexist, this will automatically refute all their points.

You mean, how to motivate the girls to lie cheat and steal?

I don't think so, just being a woman isn't enough. What happened to Brazil? Croatia isn't flourishing either...


What? Like there are no great women throughout history? That's retarded, fuck Clintons.

Are you implying that Donald Trump is "not" a politician? That's actually pretty funny.

Trump on how he speaks reminds me of the now president of the Philippines Duterte.  They are both tough talking without a brake on every words they said even it could be used against them.  Sometimes those people who are expressive are the one you could really trust.  They must be harsh with their words but if you look at it and realize that, yes, it is true, it is the way to do it, it is how should be done.  On the otherhand, Mrs. Clinton is a politician so we know how she will do it on the office. 

Hillary Clinton. I see something better,  something can make US better.
As a woman,  she can be a motivator for the girls around the world that a woman can be someone.
Woman can be a leader, woman can lead a big country.

Then you know it's time to order ammo from Mexico, courtesy of the Silk Road (whichever version is currently being used right now, LOL).

The answer to the ammo problem is, when the company wants to transport it, simply sell it to one of their employees, who transports it personally. The Constitution and Bill of Rights keeps transportation of personal property from being denied. Then sell it on the other end.

This also bypasses a lot of interstate transportation taxes, because transporting personal property over State lines can't be taxed easily.

^
I am thinking about this statement

A key ingredient necessary for making gunpowder has been re-classified as a high explosive, making it illegal for any company within the industry to transport or store it as they have for decades.

No ammo right, Homeland gonna rig the vote right.

People want to fight back? when your own ammo runs out, nothing to replace it with.
Maybe I looking at this like a conspiracist and I am wrong, I just see a weird connection to this.

Every single time Obama gives a speech on gun control, weapons stocks prices increase. He has got to own shares in those weapon stocks, it's the only thing that makes any sense.

I know this is not related to the thread, but important to see this article, could be just scaremongering, and I do not know the reputation of the website, it just may be hot air, any truth in this at all, if so something big is going down.

http://conservative-daily.com/2016/08/31/breaking-news-obama-atf-announces-backdoor-ammo-ban/

Maybe this is related to the ammunition ban.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/homeland-eyes-special-declaration-to-take-charge-of-elections/article/2600592

Impossible tha she could thus be..

Thx.  That is enlightening.  I actually had not even considered immigrants since before the fall of the Soviet Union or thereabouts since the later cohort are the only group that I had first-hand experience with.  I lived in the ratified environment of Si-V (and never the 'Deer Hunter' rust belt or whatever.)   I won't argue that the older group has numbers which even factor in since I don't know, but I assumed they did not and/or were so well 'Americanized' by this point that their political preferences more-or-less mapped to the population at large.