[Trump vs Biden] Free Debate Thread, Untainted by Mainstream Propaganda - page 2.

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: TwitchySeal on November 20, 2020, 07:33:46 AM

Quote from: mu_enrico on November 20, 2020, 01:26:37 AM

2012:
Obama: 65,915,795
Romney: 60,933,504
Total: 126,849,299

2016:
Trump: 62,984,828
Hillary: 65,853,514
Total: 128,838,342

2020:
Trump: 73,698,667
Biden: 79,683,304
Total: 153,381,971

*data from Wikipedia

Try to look at the total number of votes as it has abnormal growth in 2016 -> 2020. Based on this reason alone, if Trump's score is legitimate, he won by a landslide.

It's true. If we subtract 14 million votes from Biden, and subtract zero votes for Trump, Trump won in a landslide. lol.

Wait...you mean the Biden voters were supposed to only vote once?

https://amgreatness.com/2020/11/20/dominion-voting-systems-lawyers-up-abruptly-backs-out-of-pa-state-house-fact-finding-hearing/

Dominion Voting Systems ‘Lawyers Up,’ Abruptly Backs Out of PA State House Fact-Finding Hearing

By Debra Heine

November 20, 2020
Dominion Voting Systems Thursday night abruptly backed out of attending a fact-finding hearing that was set for Friday morning with the Pennsylvania House State Government Committee.

At a press conference Friday morning, State Govt Committee Chair Seth Grove said the 1.3. million Pennsylvanians who used Dominion’s voting machines have been “hung out to dry and slapped in their faces.”

Pennsylvania lawmakers had scheduled the hearing with the voting machine manufacturer “to help identify and correct any irregularities in the election process,” according to the House Republican Caucus.

TwitchySeal

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 2093

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: mu_enrico on November 20, 2020, 01:26:37 AM

2012:
Obama: 65,915,795
Romney: 60,933,504
Total: 126,849,299

2016:
Trump: 62,984,828
Hillary: 65,853,514
Total: 128,838,342

2020:
Trump: 73,698,667
Biden: 79,683,304
Total: 153,381,971

*data from Wikipedia

Try to look at the total number of votes as it has abnormal growth in 2016 -> 2020. Based on this reason alone, if Trump's score is legitimate, he won by a landslide.

It's true. If we subtract 14 million votes from Biden, and subtract zero votes for Trump, Trump won in a landslide. lol.

mu_enrico

copper member

Activity: 2324

Merit: 2142

Slots Enthusiast & Expert

2012:
Obama: 65,915,795
Romney: 60,933,504
Total: 126,849,299

2016:
Trump: 62,984,828
Hillary: 65,853,514
Total: 128,838,342

2020:
Trump: 73,698,667
Biden: 79,683,304
Total: 153,381,971

*data from Wikipedia

Try to look at the total number of votes as it has abnormal growth in 2016 -> 2020. Based on this reason alone, if Trump's score is legitimate, he won by a landslide.

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: Zanab247 on November 17, 2020, 01:51:24 PM

The November US presidential election just concluded....

Not quite yet, the best is yet to come...

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Dr. Hart
Flag of United States
Flag of United States
Flag of United States
@dochartdc
·
17h
Police cars revolving light
BREAKING
Police cars revolving light

TRUMP WON WITH 407 ELECTORAL VOTES!!!
Louie Gohmert reports on Scytl server raid in Germany tied to Dominion Voting Systems

https://twitter.com/dochartdc/status/1328507075044012032?s=21&fbclid=IwAR3Wndn_a-esyvqbImejvIhZZ0WlqXkRgrq4CcIe5Mw_l1d9JNEZWa1SZFE

Cool

Zanab247

full member

Activity: 1358

Merit: 207

Catalog Websites

The November US presidential election just concluded by giving out the results of the election which make Joe Biden who pulled 306, to defeat his incumbent Donald Trump who pulled 250 that make him to lose the election to Joe Biden, who citizens really voted massively to make sure Biden fulfill his campaign promises.
The battle is not yet over with Donald Trump which many secret behind the election rigging that make the electoral college not to count some vote that belong to Donald Trump. I think it will hard for the election to favour Trump because many citizens don't want him back to be their president 2021. Joe Biden is the choice of US citizen that is the reason why they surprise Biden with massive vote.

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: Hamukione on November 13, 2020, 10:44:13 PM

Looking forward to see if msm is going to be as harsh on Biden, as they were on Trump.
#RussiaGate xD

No you're not. You know the answer.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: sirazimuth on November 13, 2020, 07:31:25 PM

Quote from: BADecker on November 09, 2020, 07:46:02 PM

^^^ I feel badly, too... when someone shows me how I thwarted myself as badly as you thwarted yourself. But, come on, man. Life goes on. Take it easy. You're liable to bust a gut when you get all upset like that. Lol. Cheesy

Well yeah I admit it, I did bust a gut, I lmao at your retarded posts.... as per usual...

Quote from: Spendulus on November 13, 2020, 06:00:33 PM

Quote from: sirazimuth on November 09, 2020, 06:31:32 PM

....statewide vote counts for each candidate to see if the data set does indeed follow Benford's Law?
I did. And it does. ...

And in your opinion, that means...

What?

The vote count follows Benford's Law.
Why do you need my opinion? You already know it. I'm not here to debate silly voter fraud nonsense.

Even though we obviously differ in ideology, I enjoy reading your non political posts, they show a lot of intelligence.
Which is why I'm baffled at your refusing to accept reality, I honestly thought you were better than that.
Your guy lost. Republicans know it, Trump even knows it. This is all theater to appease his base, and it's getting ridiculous. Let it go man.

Yep! Benford's Law is another great evidence asset for the Republicans, showing that Trump must have won.

Benford’s law proves Biden didn’t win election

Quote from: https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-11-13-benfords-law-proves-biden-didnt-win-election.html#

Play-pretend “President-Elect” Joe Biden is in more hot water after it was determined using Benford’s law that there is almost no chance he legitimately won the state of Michigan – or any other key swing state, for that matter.

Though many are unfamiliar with it, Benford’s law is a computational system that has been used time and time again to unearth election fraud. It was used in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections, for instance, as well as in the 2003 California gubernatorial election. It has also been admitted as evidence in criminal cases at the federal, state and local levels.

When plugging in data straight from the city of Detroit’s election results page, for instance, Benford’s law shows that something very unnatural occurred on the Biden side, while Trump’s side showed a natural distribution of votes.

In laymen’s terms, Biden’s vote totals do not make any logical sense apart from fraud. Using Benford’s law calculations, his final numbers in Michigan do not match at a 99.999% significance level, meaning they are obviously and almost undeniably fraudulent.

Hamukione

hero member

Activity: 1202

Merit: 507

Pinch.Network Guaranteed Airdrop

I personally hoped to see Donald take another 4 years, but if Biden won fair and square, then it is what it is.

But Trump did not do as bad as msm is trying to but it.

Lots of peace deals in the middle east, North Korea finally chatting up South Korea and a bit more.

Looking forward to see if msm is going to be as harsh on Biden, as they were on Trump.
#RussiaGate xD

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: sirazimuth on November 13, 2020, 07:31:25 PM

Quote from: BADecker on November 09, 2020, 07:46:02 PM

^^^ I feel badly, too... when someone shows me how I thwarted myself as badly as you thwarted yourself. But, come on, man. Life goes on. Take it easy. You're liable to bust a gut when you get all upset like that. Lol. Cheesy

Well yeah I admit it, I did bust a gut, I lmao at your retarded posts.... as per usual...

Quote from: Spendulus on November 13, 2020, 06:00:33 PM

Quote from: sirazimuth on November 09, 2020, 06:31:32 PM

....statewide vote counts for each candidate to see if the data set does indeed follow Benford's Law?
I did. And it does. ...

And in your opinion, that means...

What?

The vote count follows Benford's Law.
Why do you need my opinion? You already know it. I'm not here to debate silly voter fraud nonsense.
....

Because I was/am curious if you could/di pick the right group, or subgroup, to measure.

sirazimuth

legendary

Activity: 3388

Merit: 3514

born once atheist

Quote from: BADecker on November 09, 2020, 07:46:02 PM

^^^ I feel badly, too... when someone shows me how I thwarted myself as badly as you thwarted yourself. But, come on, man. Life goes on. Take it easy. You're liable to bust a gut when you get all upset like that. Lol. Cheesy

Well yeah I admit it, I did bust a gut, I lmao at your retarded posts.... as per usual...

Quote from: Spendulus on November 13, 2020, 06:00:33 PM

Quote from: sirazimuth on November 09, 2020, 06:31:32 PM

....statewide vote counts for each candidate to see if the data set does indeed follow Benford's Law?
I did. And it does. ...

And in your opinion, that means...

What?

The vote count follows Benford's Law.
Why do you need my opinion? You already know it. I'm not here to debate silly voter fraud nonsense.

Even though we obviously differ in ideology, I enjoy reading your non political posts, they show a lot of intelligence.
Which is why I'm baffled at your refusing to accept reality, I honestly thought you were better than that.
Your guy lost. Republicans know it, Trump even knows it. This is all theater to appease his base, and it's getting ridiculous. Let it go man.

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: sirazimuth on November 09, 2020, 06:31:32 PM

....statewide vote counts for each candidate to see if the data set does indeed follow Benford's Law?
I did. And it does. ...

And in your opinion, that means...

What?

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: BADecker on November 09, 2020, 09:40:52 PM

....
Generally the SCOTUS doesn't interfere with State courts regarding elections. ...

Well, one thing we can certainly forget in this situation is the "generally."

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: KingScorpio on November 09, 2020, 09:21:12 PM

Quote from: sirazimuth on November 07, 2020, 03:50:18 PM

Quote from: KingScorpio on November 07, 2020, 02:27:50 PM

democrats will become a laughing stock if they will steal trump presidency with their frauded voting scam

Actually your retarded baseless posts are the laughing stock to anyone who bothers to read them that doesn't already have you on ignore.

corrupt leftists sellout media corporations don't decide on the presidency of a country, its the states courts that do that.

CNN & Co are trying to couping for the power.

The thing is, the questionable-ballot-States are basically Democrat States. So, their State judges are essentially Democrats. They might control judging the election. But they better do it right, because the Federal Government is watching them closely, and the State judges can be brought to trial and convicted just like anybody else if they act unjustly.

Generally the SCOTUS doesn't interfere with State courts regarding elections. But in this case it's going to take a shrewd eye to watch these judges. And the State judges, themselves, are going to have to be pressured with threat of imprisonment for making false judgments.

It should be very interesting to see how things go. That's why I say that the final outcome might be SCOTUS adjudicating Trump the winner, and it might take 8 more years of Trump before this can be accomplished justly.

Think of it. Trump for 8 more years.

Cool

KingScorpio

sr. member

Activity: 1470

Merit: 325

Quote from: sirazimuth on November 07, 2020, 03:50:18 PM

Quote from: KingScorpio on November 07, 2020, 02:27:50 PM

democrats will become a laughing stock if they will steal trump presidency with their frauded voting scam

Actually your retarded baseless posts are the laughing stock to anyone who bothers to read them that doesn't already have you on ignore.

corrupt leftists sellout media corporations don't decide on the presidency of a country, its the states courts that do that.

CNN & Co are trying to couping for the power.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

^^^ I feel badly, too... when someone shows me how I thwarted myself as badly as you thwarted yourself. But, come on, man. Life goes on. Take it easy. You're liable to bust a gut when you get all upset like that. Lol. Cheesy

sirazimuth

legendary

Activity: 3388

Merit: 3514

born once atheist

Dude you couldn't explain Benford's Law if you tried.
Go post some wackaloon website links or preach some magic sky fairy nonsense.
Then throw in a little ridiculous debunked pseudo science drivel for good measure.
You're good at that.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: sirazimuth on November 09, 2020, 06:31:32 PM

Quote from: Spendulus on November 08, 2020, 12:16:16 PM

Quote from: KingScorpio on November 07, 2020, 02:27:50 PM

snip....

https://www.kdnuggets.com/2020/09/diy-election-fraud-analysis-benfords-law.html

Hey dude thanx for reminding me about Benford's Law.
Did you actually look at the statewide vote counts for each candidate to see if the data set does indeed follow Benford's Law?
I did. And it does.
The statewide vote count data set followed the law to the tea.... ie leading digits of the data are not evenly distributed.
The lower the value of leading digit, the higher the frequency and vice versa, exactly what you see when you look at the statewide vote count for each candidate.
In other words, applying Benford's Law yields no evidence of fraud. Here, see for yourself.
Then again I suppose you could posit the fraudsters were well versed on Bedford’s Law so when they cooked the books
they made sure to make lower leading digits on data occur with more frequency so it (Benford's Law) wouldn’t be violated .
Occam’s Razor etc....

Here's a great explanation of it. (The Benford Law link on that wonky website you linked just sent me round in circles.)

https://www.eipartnership.net/rapid-response/what-the-election-results-dont-tell-us

Time to accept your guy lost fair and square and stop this silly voter fraud nonsense. Or not....

All you are saying is that Benford's Law proves that all the States and their electronic voting machines, plus all the media are in on the fraud.

Cool

sirazimuth

legendary

Activity: 3388

Merit: 3514

born once atheist

Quote from: Spendulus on November 08, 2020, 12:16:16 PM

Quote from: KingScorpio on November 07, 2020, 02:27:50 PM

snip....

https://www.kdnuggets.com/2020/09/diy-election-fraud-analysis-benfords-law.html

Hey dude thanx for reminding me about Benford's Law.
Did you actually look at the statewide vote counts for each candidate to see if the data set does indeed follow Benford's Law?
I did. And it does.
The statewide vote count data set followed the law to the tea.... ie leading digits of the data are not evenly distributed.
The lower the value of leading digit, the higher the frequency and vice versa, exactly what you see when you look at the statewide vote count for each candidate.
In other words, applying Benford's Law yields no evidence of fraud. Here, see for yourself.
Then again I suppose you could posit the fraudsters were well versed on Bedford’s Law so when they cooked the books
they made sure to make lower leading digits on data occur with more frequency so it (Benford's Law) wouldn’t be violated .
Occam’s Razor etc....

Here's a great explanation of it. (The Benford Law link on that wonky website you linked just sent me round in circles.)

https://www.eipartnership.net/rapid-response/what-the-election-results-dont-tell-us

Time to accept your guy lost fair and square and stop this silly voter fraud nonsense. Or not....

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: Vispilio on November 09, 2020, 08:41:22 AM

It's the first time I've seen a case where both the mainstream media and social media / search engines led by tech giants are so clearly in favor of and partial to 1 candidate and extremely
hostile against another, who happens to be the sitting president by the way Wink

...

A sitting president of the US who has started zero wars, incidentally.

If the Biden-Zombie wobbles to the White House, it will not be more than a year before our armed forces are in action.

450,000 in just one batch of suspicious ballots?

https://thepostmillennial.com/sydney-powell-claims-there-are-450-000-ballots-that-voted-only-for-biden-left-the-rest-blank

Topic: [Trump vs Biden] Free Debate Thread, Untainted by Mainstream Propaganda - page 2. (Read 728 times)