Topic: TRUMP WINS - page 5. (Read 16660 times)

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/north_america/2016-u-s-presidential-election/vulgar-explanation-of-the-trump-victory/

I hope that you are right and the Americans thought better of it. I don't think they just will count the votes. Maybe the elites of America have realized their mistake? We cannot allow the clown to running the world!

What started a recount in Wisconsin. Let's see where it leads. I wonder whether the recalculations in all 3 States? I think that a recount in Wisconsin will show fraud Trump.

The rigging is very real and it's the establishment figures that have access to voting fraud not outsiders like Trump. Only here in America do we have over 3 million illegal aliens voting and untold (allegedly ~ 4mil) numbers of people casting extra ballots of dead people that haven't been taken off the voter rolls.

Here's a litte info about this "recount funding'' that the Green party candidate is going for that only challenges 3 states (that Trump won - MI, WI, PA) out of all other states, that's how they hope to steal it. http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=50879

Election fraud expert Bev Harris (look her up) says that Hillary and co already swiped 5 states from Trump and that he won the popular vote when the illegals and dead voters aren't counted.

Alex Jones talks about this counter-coup the dems are attempting to pull in this short video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4tTt326_-k

Don't read any signals, from the actions of the "protests" of paid political operatives, past the election.

I don't remember such dirty elections of the President as this year in America. The result of these elections is also very contradictory. In many countries, such a result could lead to civil war. I think it is a signal for America to change.

On the Stein re-count topic for a moment...

Stein played a somewhat interesting role in 2016.  I figure that any intelligent person who is gung-ho on the climate fraud is in it for social issues.  Sometimes they are 'for real' in that they think collectivism would produce a better world (for social and/or environmental reasons), and sometimes they see the bigger picture of a corporate world takeover.  No way to know where Stein falls on this spectrum, but she did basically endorse Trump near the end so she seems to have come to her senses and figured global thermo-nuclear war was not a good thing.

Stein is, of course, a tool in this re-count thing since (and I'm supposing here) that she doesn't have any actual money herself, but her signature is required on some papers at least so she must have her reasons.

For my part I do expect that there actually was massive vote fraud in PA, MI, and WI.  Massive fraud in favor of the Dems.  Anyone suspecting the same and not liking it for whatever reason might be inclined to instigate a 're-count'.  Risky, especially in light of the death threats against the electoral college participants and such, but further analysis of 2016 could add incentive to clean up the election system.  A shrewd commie or eco-freak could look forward a few cycles when the current cohort of indoctrinated mouth-breathers are 'all grown up', and more of us less damaged fossils have kicked the bucket.

Trump seems ambivalent about the re-count, and some of the Trump operatives seem to have emitted a yelp then shut their traps.  This indicates to me that they see some potential pros among the cons of a re-count.  As I tap this out, I'm not aware of much support from the Dem establishment.

Another possibility is that Stein would prefer to see an Obama third term.  She probably does see Obama as at worst at least the lesser of two evils given his strong efforts to destroy the state-side economy, appropriate property via environmental scams, hand over sovereignty to the U.N. via TPP and other international deals, etc.  Stein might be shooting for such an electoral college mess (or a psy-op centered around it) that results in Obama or someone he chooses continues his operations.

On the general topic, least we forget, Obama invited to OSCE to 'observe' our 2016 election process here in the U.S. at much higher counts than in the past.  Not much has been said about that since it was announced.  It will be interesting to see if they swoop in at some point between now and the inauguration.

The Republicans had enough manpower. But they were prevented from sending their observers to most of the inner city polling booths. In most of the deep-blue polling booths, there were no Republican observers present during the election day. At least in some of these booths, the Democrats engaged in massive vote stuffing. A perfect example is here:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/03/gop-call-for-statewide-pennsylvania-poll-watchers-is-denied.html

I don't believe that the Republicans could not provide observers all sites. But I'm interested in how many were correctly recounted. As for IDs, you should not forget about the majority of Republicans in the Senate.

Elections were rigged,Soros owned votiong machines in 17 states and  a few days after the elections they've said that Trump actually won the popular vote.

Election certainly rigged. And recount does not help establish the truth. The man put the post is not casual. It's beneficial to someone

Those are the states where the maximum amount of voter fraud occurs. Even illegal aliens can vote in these states, and the Democrats have opposed a proposal to make government issued ID cards mandatory to take part in the voting process. The republicans can't do anything, as they don't have sufficient manpower to send observers to all the inner city polling booths.

No matter where the voices! I don't understand how you can win the popular vote and lose the election. This is only possible in America. Discussions are under way to recount the votes. Imagine if it turns out that elections are rigged?

these two million votes are from california and newyork,,,just the same state democrate always win

Yes, Trump won.

Any other questions?

Oh, one more thing.

You mentioned a "Hillary?"

Who is that?

Trump won the election? Hillary Clinton got 2 million more votes. I think that it proves the imperfection of the electoral legislation of America. I'm afraid that this situation can significantly increase the split in society.

I like GJ, because he owned a marijuana business and I think is a co owner of it now. I like the idea he is with marijuana vs the opponents that are against legalizing federally.

He will do what he has been doing for the past 8 years. He will woke up at 8 am, have his breakfast, then play golf and then he'll have his lunch. After that, he will watch some soap opera, before departing again to play golf.

what will Obama do before Trump assumes?

What horrible music. Not what they were saying because I don't speak Spanish, but the music itself. I haven't heard anything that bad since the 1980s. I got stoned at small Pantera concert in 1981 and projectile vomited on the band. Everyone there said it was the best part of the show. I'd rather have disco back than thrash metal. With shit thrash metal as the background score and spanish lyrics I seriously doubt they're reaching their intended audience.