Topic: Trust abuse and some "strange" theories. (Read 877 times)

I know you would love it if it were, but this thread isn't about me.

Ok, you've deflected this thread away from your trust abuse.

2020 will bring you a lot more red I think, no matter how upset you get. 

Deflecting from what exactly? Your very on topic posts? Get medicated nutbar.

And again - still - always - you post nothing but deflection.

You don't belong anywhere near DT.

Cool story bro. Don't you have some calls to the IRS and SEC to make? What happened to BPIP Vod, does baby need his baba? The forum not "neutral" enough for you? Funny how that happens when you act like a deranged lunatic trying to sick government agencies on its more trusted members because your butt hurts.

You are on DT1 to be a puppet?   What did he help you out with?  Some ponzi shares?  Or just some reciprocal exclusion? 

You don't belong anywhere near DT.

So are you going to bother telling me what you think I did to you?

EDIT: FYI, because you are obviously retarded, I thought I should spell it out for you. I didn't add ABitNut back to my trust list, he never left it. I was not on default trust, now I am. I was going to remove him to help you out, but then you left me frivolous negative ratings and started talking mad shit.

Trust me I haven't thought about you for a second until we last spoke a few months ago, and the 3 seconds it would have taken to add ABitNut back on to my trust list just to spite you would be a wasted 3 seconds. Please do cry some more about this situation entirely of your own creation though, the threats of more negative ratings from your nobody alts are a nice touch too. All very entertaining.

Right right 

What exactly did I do to you? Didn't you just get done chastising me for a negative rating I didn't even give you? I don't owe you shit little boy. I offered you help and you spit in my face. Now you can deal with the results of me doing nothing for you. Cry me a river.

Say what you want, i have a new account since few month and you'll get another -1 later with my others accounts,  because i still not happy about what you did to me and you did not repair it

You can put a feedback to say that i have an alt account named "Virtualis Games" which is the name of my project, it's ok, you are very immature  

I stopped using this account since few month because you fucked it, but i saw few days ago that you put ABitNut back in the trust list so now my negative reputation has coming back, no doubt that you want to play.

Aw look who it is. So I conspired to make ABitNut leave you a negative rating years ago, then worked to get on DT all to make sure some retard I don't even know and at the time had zero interactions with, got a negative rating did I? I know you are probably too brain damaged to remember, but YOU ASKED ME for help and I was the one trying to help you get that rating removed. Of course once you got what you wanted you started talking shit and threw me under a bus for my troubles. I guess in your partially functional brain stem I would never be back on default trust, so it didn't matter because you got what you wanted one way or another. Guess you were wrong and you told the one guy who could help you to fuck off and left him a negative rating yourself. Oopsey doopsey.

"StonerStanley   2019-12-27      Dishonest person who manipulate the trust list and opinion."


Hmmm... sounds pretty prescient to me. Thanks for being the perfect example of my point by the way.

Funny. From the part of the guy that manipulated the trust list to give me a -1. You also manipulated the list to avoid getting a -1.

You are very dishonnest TECSHARE.

FTFY. Anyhow, that's unrelated to my post. I'm only liable for what I say, not for what you understand.

Trust flags

I don't even necessarily disagree with you. The problem is that "lying" is often subjective and is subject to large amounts of interpretation regardless if you are right or not. My opinion on the matter is the ratings you left are counter productive to your own goals, and your fight against these lies would better be served by removing those ratings and simply drawing attention to this abuse via public discussion. You seem to be some what familiar with my history here. I shed no tears for the forum bitstasi. I am speaking only from a position of what I think would honestly help you serve your stated goals here. Right now your abuse of the trust system strips you of any moral authority in the situation, removing those ratings gives you a distinct advantage and would make people much more willing to hear your grievances. That is all. No one can make you do anything, just offering some friendly advice.

What beautiful words, however, Joni again is hypocritical 


As we see, Joni loves to lie, but does not like to answer for his words.


Now back to the questions that Johny for some reason ignores:

1.) Joni hurt his psyche on a national issue. He's a nationalist and pours this shit in Ru local.


2.) According to Joni theymos wants to steal forum money.


After madnessteat verified the translation, it’s hard to give up his words, so Joni simply ignores this question. What an honest man 

Despite some of your ideas is close to me (for example this post in politics and society about guns and trust) i can't perform your advise. Let me tell you why

Also this will be answer for this post:

There is not "difference in opinions". Difference in opinion is when you with your friend can't come to consensus what to eat: burgers or pizza. Or when two people decide which is better - communism or capitalism.

When someone lying and manipulating, blames someone in "protecting scammers" without any proof, you can't consider it as "difference in opinion".

Lying in most cultures (except meybe some african and pacific indians) is forbidden. If you lied and were catched on it, mark "liar" will be with you for all your life. In some times, mark would be with you, and your tongue - not (it would be torn out of your mouth).

Even today, in many european and some tates in USA you can be called in court for slander. And it could end for you sometimes in jail. Why so? It's easy to answer: because with false slander ("he is rapist, he is murder, he is thief!) you left someone under a threat. Under threat of imprisonment,  under the threat of reputation loss.
So, if in real life you must bear some consequences for your false slander, why it shouldn't be here?

Also, there three main points why feedback is still correct and will not remove that.

1 First: This person keep lying

(and will keep doing that forever, i don't know any liar who stopped to lie by himself)

2. Second:
He did not apologize before me, chimk, other users whom he accused to be a "corrupted" and "protectors of scammer"
here is an example of adequate apologize:


Of course, this topic can disorientate newbies, like "Wow, so Craig Wright is real Satoshi, so Bitcoin SV is real bitcoin. I will buy some bitcoin SV, to teh Mhoooooooooon!!1"
And this maggot don't fucking care about it, he will just laugh if something like that would happen, because his words - bitcoin scam and we all - sectarians.


Lying + manipulating + trolling + bitcoin hating = enough reason to think that this user is high risk in monetary terms to any user of Bitcoin forum.



So, my feedback's main purpose - to warn users. I used red paint because of obvious reasons - people will read move attentively (as you know, all important signs on the road or on electric transformer in the city is mostly red or orange paint).

Afterwords:
I like some of you, some of you i don't like and maybe think that you're acting like assholes sometime, but i not tagged KTChampions for one reason. I tagged him for full complex of reasons, which together makes him dangerous to any user of this forum. That's my opinion.

KTChampions == The-One-Above-All if the last one would started to investigate bounty cheaters and scams. (my view)

Judging by a specific message from johhnyUA, he doesn't trust KTChampions feedbacks. For such cases, the option (~) exists.

While I disagree with KTChampions quite often, I don't think he deserves red trust. The key part of red trust is "high risk". None of the the things mentioned in johhnyUA's feedback represent high risk. They do represent a significant difference in opinions, which should not be basis for red trust.

Thank you for your opinion. I agree with you and this is not a complete list of things that scammers whom I investigated or their friends accuse me of.
Naturally, these feedback do not seriously bother me, but I was forced to make this post as a single place for all references - since troll Joni writes nonsense here and there.


This is a completed stage. He lose all his discussions with me. That is why he left feedback "in favor" of third parties (who themselves did not leave me any feedbacks, and I did not leave any feedbacks to them).