Pages:
Author

Topic: Trust Abuser Lutpin - page 2. (Read 1998 times)

member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
March 01, 2016, 03:38:40 PM
#27
I have been finding alts of scammers but IMO if password of account changed and someone saying account was sold then giving negative with old proofs isn't a good idea.
Someone a user sell one of their account and that used for scam it doesn't mean give negative to all accounts without any proof

The problem is the anointed group frowns on selling of accounts as well as this issue,so the negative rep would just change to show that.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1005
4 Mana 7/7
March 01, 2016, 03:37:54 PM
#26
I have been finding alts of scammers but IMO if password of account changed and someone saying account was sold then giving negative with old proofs isn't a good idea.
So in your opinion if someone scammed in Nov. 2015 , and then decided to come back on his alt and said "I was sold this account by the owner." after a simple pass change you'd believe that?
Someone a user sell one of their account and that used for scam it doesn't mean give negative to all accounts without any proof
Why not? Anyway there is ample proof(that has still not been disproved by any strong indication of an account sale, except a pass change) the account was originally under CEG's control. For all I know it still could be

I will take a look at everything later and will give my opinion if ownership transferred prior to the negative rating being issued later today.
Feel free to share the proofs if you come to the conclusion that the account was indeed sold, unlike the OP who keeps stupidly repeating the same thing



The problem is the anointed group frowns on selling of accounts as well as this issue,so the negative rep would just change to show that.

Account sales is ok by my book
sr. member
Activity: 333
Merit: 250
March 01, 2016, 03:31:46 PM
#25
I have been finding alts of scammers but IMO if password of account changed and someone saying account was sold then giving negative with old proofs isn't a good idea.
Someone a user sell one of their account and that used for scam it doesn't mean give negative to all accounts without any proof
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
March 01, 2016, 03:31:13 PM
#24
I will take a look at everything later and will give my opinion if ownership transferred prior to the negative rating being issued later today.

I believe that I checked for this when I placed my rating on the account, however I will check again.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1019
March 01, 2016, 03:28:00 PM
#23
your proofs are old and account ownership changed after that
You haven't proved that. Any scammer after scamming can say "Oh but I bought this account from the other guy" do you seriously expect anyone to believe you without proof? Just based on the seclog?

but yes you added 1 post to your account easily
And what exactly does that mean? Neither am I farming for a sig like you, nor do I have any potential activity to claim by posting "empty" posts


Edit: Not that I'm implying in any way that the neg will be removed even if you bought the account
you guys are full of shit and blind

@Neotox check your PM
take the account and refund me my money
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1005
4 Mana 7/7
March 01, 2016, 03:22:16 PM
#22
your proofs are old and account ownership changed after that
You haven't proved that. Any scammer after scamming can say "Oh but I bought this account from the other guy" do you seriously expect anyone to believe you without proof? Just based on the seclog?

but yes you added 1 post to your account easily
And what exactly does that mean? Neither am I farming for a sig like you, nor do I have any potential activity to claim by posting "empty" posts


Edit: Not that I'm implying in any way that the neg will be removed even if you bought the account
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1019
March 01, 2016, 03:17:33 PM
#21
lol
you need to make efforts to read whole topic again, your proofs are old and account ownership changed after that. but yes you added 1 post to your account easily
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1005
4 Mana 7/7
March 01, 2016, 03:16:32 PM
#20

if you get solid proof you are free to give negative
ausbit uses the address 1JqhHA5YRbSGhqtrMMjSNF3T2vj25cyLY8 that is connected to the addresses 1MzanHD42LRWzQKYm5mtQ5JJGgMsjhJ2PD, 1CGpDLK7uBp6jbzL9J2aa4LMqGDhpiNY5m and 18AEV6fmCbGtQsJLWyisiaTwJFK2rwMzdW throught the transactions 3033f1dd85bb77b519db61207bb51a9fab0b3837b7a5934a759af1c0d9a01207 (Linking 1CGpD and 18AEV) and d65cd7b17e146f0e4fd9298bbdf632e4529ef06a3f4894813dda16ca89126cd2 (Linking 1CGpD, 1JqhH and 1Mzan).

ausbit posting the 1JqhH address:

I am going away from this campaign, there must be a new slot open.
I just applied, can you check please
UID: 390217 showing no free slots found.
BTC address: 1JqhHA5YRbSGhqtrMMjSNF3T2vj25cyLY8
Since there is a free slot, please join me in, i would love to be in Bitmixer campaign.
BigBoy89 is posting the 18AEV address here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13276186
*Pay Per Post:
*Name: GreBit
*Post count:824
*Rank: Hero Member
*Bitcoin Address: 1CGpDLK7uBp6jbzL9J2aa4LMqGDhpiNY5m
I would like to join your campaign, please let me know about your acceptance and accordingly I will wear your signature and I have sent a PM to you.
HarHarHar9965 is posting the 1Mzan address here (aswell as on his profile):
Hi zengryt,
I would like to join in your signature campaign, Please kindly let me know about spot availability for me.Smiley
*Fixedrate or Pay Per Post: Pay Per Post
*Name: HarHarHar9965
*Post count: 1043
*Rank: Hero Member
*Bitcoin Address: 1MzanHD42LRWzQKYm5mtQ5JJGgMsjhJ2PD
Regards,
HarHarHar9965...
And now it's getting interesting. HarHarHar9965 has got negative feedback from Quickseller for this reason:
Quote
Participating in trust farming, and faking trades. I would consider this person to be untrustworthy
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1019
March 01, 2016, 03:10:15 PM
#19
And what made you think opening a drama thread before giving all the necessary proofs, would help your case and perhaps change Lutpin's opinion?
But jumping in on the recent drama instead of contacting me with the proofs is so much easier.
Don't be stupid, did you checked the linked post and seen it was only my account to that post
you are giving stupid negatives without proofs and now trying to be smart, don't make others fool
accept our mistake and remove negative

if you get solid proof you are free to give negative
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
March 01, 2016, 03:01:05 PM
#18
I think this should be in reputation.

LutPin is usually quite good wit trust ideas. Usually there opinion is quite good.
If it is old then I don't really thing he shoul dhave brought it back u uness the post was deleted.
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
March 01, 2016, 02:59:09 PM
#17
And what made you think opening a drama thread before giving all the necessary proofs, would help your case and perhaps change Lutpin's opinion?
But jumping in on the recent drama instead of contacting me with the proofs is so much easier.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1005
4 Mana 7/7
March 01, 2016, 02:57:58 PM
#16
If you have missed something proofs are available that account was sold
And what made you think opening a drama thread before giving all the necessary proofs, would help your case and perhaps change Lutpin's opinion?
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1019
March 01, 2016, 02:56:32 PM
#15
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13887541

I guess that's the risk of buying accounts.
why the only my account from the list was tagged when its ownership was changed already and any blind person can see that from security log

Security log doesn't prove who changed the password. The whole, I bought this account and etc has been used before. Not saying this is what you did, instead trying to show you why account buying can be risking.
A user with common sense can get idea from security log that account ownership is changed

You telling me a scammer can't change their own password and claim the same thing? A user with common sense would also understand that. Let's not forget this is bitcointalk after all.

This is the risk of buying accounts. You might as well take it as a lose unless you can prove you're not said member. Sure it sucks but you can thank those who abused the system by buying accounts and using them for the wrong reasons.
If you have missed something proofs are available that account was sold
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
March 01, 2016, 02:46:22 PM
#14
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13887541

I guess that's the risk of buying accounts.
why the only my account from the list was tagged when its ownership was changed already and any blind person can see that from security log

Security log doesn't prove who changed the password. The whole, I bought this account and etc has been used before. Not saying this is what you did, instead trying to show you why account buying can be risking.
A user with common sense can get idea from security log that account ownership is changed

You telling me a scammer can't change their own password and claim the same thing? A user with common sense would also understand that. Let's not forget this is bitcointalk after all.

This is the risk of buying accounts. You might as well take it as a lose unless you can prove you're not said member. Sure it sucks but you can thank those who abused the system by buying accounts and using them for the wrong reasons.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1019
March 01, 2016, 02:44:49 PM
#13
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13887541

I guess that's the risk of buying accounts.
why the only my account from the list was tagged when its ownership was changed already and any blind person can see that from security log

Security log doesn't prove who changed the password. The whole, I bought this account and etc has been used before. Not saying this is what you did, instead trying to show you why account buying can be risking.
A user with common sense can get idea from security log that account ownership is changed
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
March 01, 2016, 02:40:22 PM
#12
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13887541

I guess that's the risk of buying accounts.
why the only my account from the list was tagged when its ownership was changed already and any blind person can see that from security log

Security log doesn't prove who changed the password. The whole, I bought this account and etc has been used before. Not saying this is what you did, instead trying to show you why account buying can be risking.

Your account was linked to others through block chain evidence and received the appropriate feedback. That is not trust abuse.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
Free & Fast Neotox Escrow http://bit.ly/1OGVykp
March 01, 2016, 02:39:58 PM
#11
you only believe what you see Tongue
I saw your previous post about the "rest or mind treatment" I supposedly need.
I didn't take it too positive, but I value your opinion.
So you care for your customers, next step would be caring for the accounts you sell and where they come from.
thanks for your tips but I know how to do business,I am doing this before you was registered

but you really need to learn how to find scammer before acting to be smart Wink
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
March 01, 2016, 02:37:18 PM
#10
you only believe what you see Tongue
I saw your previous post about the "rest or mind treatment" I supposedly need.
I didn't take it too positive, but I value your opinion.
So you care for your customers, next step would be caring for the accounts you sell and where they come from.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
Free & Fast Neotox Escrow http://bit.ly/1OGVykp
March 01, 2016, 02:36:14 PM
#9
you expecting me here?  Tongue
After your two messages in 20 minutes about me removing my negative from that exact account, yes.
you only believe what you see Tongue
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
March 01, 2016, 02:34:16 PM
#8
you expecting me here?  Tongue
After your two messages in 20 minutes about me removing my negative from that exact account, yes.
Pages:
Jump to: