Stop being melodramatic, if you care so much you should just buy a fresh account. One thing I will say is I wish TP was consistent in his approach to account dealing. If you're going to tag people for it, I don't think it is really fair to be selective about it.
An example of this can be found where? Is this another case of "You're doing something wrong. Even though I haven't pointed out exactly what it is, I'll still complain about it."?Do I really seem like the type of person to make accusations like this without any proof? Here is an excellent example of it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/600-hero-member-starts-at-001-btc-1492296
TP gave negative trust to everyone who bid in that thread (as per their rating's reference link)... except for the staff member and the guy who had positive trust at the time. They all did exactly the same thing, shouldn't they all be equally untrustworthy?
Yes and no. Depends on the exact details of the case. If it were him giving negative ratings now for that thread, then I'd argue that letting them *slide* was understandable. However, these ratings were left a few days after the thread was created. I don't know why he would avoid tagging those two randoms (OmegaStarScream was not a staff member at the time so that is irrelevant).I could argue two things: a) They were non DT ratings, thus consistency and reliability isn't as necessary as with DT ratings. b) These were one of his earlier ratings (within the first 100 sent I believe). I'd expect him to know better now.
Anyhow, the best time to fix it is now.
. Beside why don't "The Pharmacist" tag me or other normal member but you? Of course you'll never being tagged if you do nothing wrong 
