Nope. I’d rather stick with logics and actual thinking rather than rely on my biased insticts and gut feeling and hope for the best.
I also prefer reason over instincts when gambling. By relying on instincts, gamblers are not exactly going to follow responsible gambling guidelines, as their instincts can say anything at anytime of the game. To be driven by instincts sounds like being motivated by impulses in my opinion, what is a very dangerous practice in gambling. As we have already read lots of time on this sub-section of the forum, many people faced several and harsh losses due to this kind of behavior.
I’d argue that you actually do the opposite of what you just told us lol. Cause how can you trust yourself when the only thing uou can reliably do when you gamble is make the bets as the way you wanted? You can’t control the outcome, hell, the outcome will even control you at times due to gambler’s fallacy, and you’re out here telling people to trust their instincts? C’mon man.
He actually used his instincts to cashout his money before the bet was over. So, indeed, his statement is a bit contradictory. If his bet was logically calculated, he would have taken it till the end. In the same manner he wouldn't be doubtful about cashing out earlier if it was also pre-determined by him before placing the bet. In the end his instincts lead him to become unsatisfied over his final decision, anyway.