Topic: TT-Miner 2022.4.1 KAWPOW, PROGPOW, ETHASH, ETCHASH, EPIC, SHA512256D, GHOSTRIDER - page 22. (Read 132189 times)

ok mtp means it is working for MTP now with 3.0.4???

ok mtp
GeForce Driver-Ver:    431.60
Supported CUDA-Ver:    10.10
CUDA devices:          2
* #0 PCI 0:1 ASUS      GeForce RTX 2060 (7.5)     CoreClk 1365 MHz  MemClk 0 MHz     6144 MB   SM: 30  2630 mh/s
* #1 PCI 0:2 MSI       GeForce RTX 2060 (7.5)     CoreClk 300 MHz   MemClk 405 MHz   6144 MB   SM: 30  2492 mh/s

Hi - can you please send me more details about your problem?

it seems to work here:


My MTP test (2060 & 1070) @ mtp.eu.nicehash.com:3374

GeForce Driver-Ver:    431.60
Supported CUDA-Ver:    10.10
CUDA devices:          2
* #0 PCI 0:1 Zotac     GeForce RTX 2060 (7.5)     CoreClk 300 MHz   MemClk 405 MHz   6144 MB   SM: 30
* #1 PCI 0:2 Zotac     GeForce GTX 1070 (6.1)     CoreClk 139 MHz   MemClk 405 MHz   8192 MB   SM: 15

after about 15minutes:

16:01:24 Luck:    268.44 MH @ 4.321 MH/s -> avg. secs/shr: 63 secs.   passed 94 secs.   this shr: 149%   session: 83%
16:01:33 GPU[00]: Found solution #19, diff = 1.104 GH
16:01:33 GPU[00]: Accepted #19, RT in 143 ms. [mtp.eu.nicehash.com:3374]
16:01:33 GPU[01]: Found solution #16, diff = 322.91 MH
16:01:34 GPU[01]: Accepted #16, RT in 181 ms. [mtp.eu.nicehash.com:3374]
16:01:39 GPU[00]: 2.224 MH/s [A19:R0 0.0%]  CClk:1.515 GHz  MClk:2.507 GHz  77C  82%  123 W  18.074 kH/W  last: 6 sec.
16:01:39 GPU[01]: 2.098 MH/s [A16:R0 0.0%]  CClk:1.733 GHz  MClk:4.201 GHz  66C  42%  138 W  15.197 kH/W  last: 5 sec.
16:01:39 All[2m]: 4.321 MH/s [A35:R0 0.0%]  261 W  16.553 kH/W  uptime: 00:16:55  last: 5 sec.
16:01:39 Luck:    268.44 MH @ 4.321 MH/s -> avg. secs/shr: 63 secs.   passed 5 secs.   this shr: 7%   session: 82%
16:01:48 GPU[00]: Found solution #20, diff = 310.95 MH
16:01:48 GPU[00]: Accepted #20, RT in 280 ms. [mtp.eu.nicehash.com:3374]

2060: PL: 78%, core 0, mem 0
1070: PL: 65%, core 100, mem 100


Lyra2 - same settings, same gpu, @ lyra2rev3.eu-new.nicehash.com:3373

16:05:39 GPU[00]: Found solution #1, diff = 27.156 GH
16:05:39 GPU[00]: Accepted #1, RT in 32 ms. [lyra2rev3.eu-new.nicehash.com:3373]
16:05:49 Pool[0]: Received new job#: b5ba8855
16:05:54 GPU[00]: 41.189 MH/s [A1:R0 0.0%]  CClk:1.650 GHz  MClk:2.507 GHz  78C  81%  122 W  337.61 kH/W  last: 14 sec.
16:05:54 GPU[01]: 32.884 MH/s [A0:R0 -]  CClk:1.873 GHz  MClk:4.201 GHz  66C  39%  126 W  260.99 kH/W  last: -
16:05:54 All[2m]: 74.073 MH/s [A1:R0 0.0%]  248 W  298.68 kH/W  uptime: 00:01:55  last: 14 sec.
16:05:54 Luck:    2.148 GH @ 74.073 MH/s -> avg. secs/shr: 29 secs.   passed 14 secs.   this shr: 48%   session: 344%
16:05:59 Pool[0]: difficulty changed from 2.148 GH to 1.074 GH

yes old mtp
new nicehash lyra2v3

ttminer 3.01 ok

old nicehash? what do you mean with 'benchmark' - just mining?

89/5000
impossible to benchmark with nicehash (time hout) 1.9.1.12 et 1.9.2.12 mtp et lyra2
asus card rog strik geforce rtx 2060 6go

TT-Miner Release 3.0.4

FIX: Possible crash under certain conditions
FIX: No notification about DevFee mining
FIX: TT sends invalid shares to pool under certain conditions when switch from REG to DEV mining
Gen: Reduced CPU usage for MTP/ProgPoW/ETHASH
Gen: Reduced system-memory requirements for MTP/ProgPoW/ETHASH
Gen: Reduced requirements may result in better performance on your system


Sorry for the confusion with version 3.0.3 - too many bugs ;-(

Please let me know if you have any issues with the release.

The requested URL /download/Miner/TT-Miner.zip was not found on this server.
3.02 can not do the benchmark on asus rog strik rtx 2060 the 3.01 works

The requested URL /download/Miner/TT-Miner.zip was not found on this server.

Hi TrailingStop, please see attached logs for new version. For me most stable version 2.2.5
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-Cn1efFEWlCKRyZfaR4hn70kbLEiVcPJ
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1l5CReqMcO-X_pZW90IArCvk5qN40TU6Z
Thanks

UPDATE WILL BE AVAILABLE LATER TODAY!!!


TT-Miner Release 3.0.3

FIX: Possible crash under certain conditions
FIX: No notification about DevFee mining
Gen: Reduced CPU usage for MTP/ProgPoW/ETHASH
Gen: Reduced system-memory requirements for MTP/ProgPoW/ETHASH
Gen: Reduced requirements may result in better performance on your system


Please let me know if you have any issues.

Okay, thanks for your reply.
I added the linux link to my page.

For the records, I've been mining ProgPow overnight and hashrates have increased over time... That's a very nice feature (if intended!).

Before I let HiveOS upgrade itself (and TT-miner) to the latest version, I was doing 18.3+ MH/s on the 1080's and 17.7+ MH/s on the 2060's.
That's with power limit at 150W on the 1080's and 135W on the 2060's.

Impressive.
Good job, Herr TrailingStop.

Yes. Same as for Windows with .tar.xz extention for zip.

Do you have a link with the version number in the file name for Linux, too?

Depends on the card you have. Rtx will be 7 and up.
I guess that the nvidia compiler that comes with hiveos.

So if I set them all to 6.1 it works.
I'm using driver 430.26 in HiveOS.
Miner version is 3.0.1 I think (HiveOS hasn't updated to 3.0.2 yet).

Shouldn't the cards be able to run higher compute versions though?...

Yes, setting the compute-value should fix this. It might come from a old cuda compiler that do not support your compute level, or it is just the graphics driver that doesn't support it.
you can also use -compute 61 to set all devices to 6.1

I'm on HiveOS. The 1080's are fine as such, it's the 2060's that throw out the errors. I'll try with the other compute values!

EDIT: hmmm, still doing it: Error ******** GPU[04] CudaError: 7 at position 50

I have some for my 2060 and 1070, but you will see that you will get completely different results. You will see differences for a different OS, a different OS-Version, different CPU, RAM, Vitual Memory, GPU, OC-settings, Memory on your GPU (size/clk), base/turbo clk of your gpu, fan & temp. And much more - they all have impact on your results. Also if you run ProgPoW you see the performance for a algo-snapshot - the algo will change all 50 blocks for rev 0.9.2 - and the ZANO version, and for every new epoch. So if I say you can get 14MH/s instead of 13.8 MH/s for ProgPoW092 with a 1070, then this might not be correct for you.

So- sorry, but I really think that it doesn't not make much sense because you will get other results.