Topic: Turkey´s Civil War: Fighting moving from rural areas to cities (Read 4763 times)

The country that attempted to destroy my entire race?

I hope those POS get a nice dose of karama.

Your reply has nothing to do with my original post. I was talking about soldiers from the third world nations being used as peacekeepers, and you are trying to divert the topic by claiming that Serbs were killing Muslims. And my post had nothing to do with Islamophobia. Where is Islamophpbia when Muslim Pakistani soldiers were killing Muslim Balochis?

Your Islamophobia makes you blind!
You don't talk about Bosnia. While Serbians kill innocent civilians in Bosnia UN peacekeepers watched.
http://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/16/world/un-details-its-failure-to-stop-95-bosnia-massacre.html
Or in Somalia?
http://www.slideshare.net/alexbeja/the-failure-of-the-united-nations

Could also be avoided by shit-canning the entire United Nations.  I'm not opposed to having an international organization to deal with a limited number of critical international situations, but the United Nations was, IMHO, born corrupt and screwed up and has only gotten worse since that time.  Technology is such that the entire world could vote individually for positions within an organization with a sub-set of it's current charter.  Just as is the case here in the U.S., a lot of problems in the U.N. could be addressed if the charter outlined a radical form of transparency.  This is the polar opposite of what we have going on now, and the covert nature of it's leadership and operations are responsible in my opinion for a great deal of the deficiency and malfeasance expressed by the organization.

In most of the cases, the "United Nations Peacekeeping Force" is composed of soldiers from third world nations such as Bangladesh and Pakistan, where there is a history of human rights abuses by the soldiers against the civilian population. Pakistani soldiers have committed numerous human rights violations against the Balochis, while their Bangladeshi cousins have participated in the ethnic cleansing of Buddhists in the Chittagong Hill Tracts region. This could be avoided if developed countries such as Japan and Luxembourg are ready to provide soldiers to the Peacekeeping Force.

That means they try bringing peace to regions by f***ing.
No war yes love.

They´re always embroiled in child molestation scandals where they´re supposed to be keeping the peace. Sounds like a very good scheme to actually disrupt the peace if you ask me.

Search Results
Child sexual abuse by UN peacekeepers - Wikipedia, the ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sexual_abuse_by_UN_peacekeepers
Sexual abuse of female minors by personnel in United Nations peacekeeping forces has seriously undermined the credibility of "peacekeeping" missions ...
UN finds more cases of child abuse by European troops in ...
www.theguardian.com › World › Central African Republic
Jan 29, 2016 - Up to six more cases of alleged sexual abuse, including girl of 7 and boy of 9, by EU and French soldiers in Central African Republic, says ...
UN accused of 'gross failure' over alleged sexual abuse by ...
www.theguardian.com › World › United Nations
Dec 17, 2015 - Independent panel says UN's lack of response allowed assaults on children by peacekeepers in Central African Republic to continue.

Where UN could be successful in regions where war exist?
UN works only for American profits by putting benzine on fire. UN has no peacekeeper, has peacebroker

Fighting must be avoided everywhere, at any cost. I hope that the United Nations will intervene in this conflict, and send peacekeepers to south-east Turkey.

The United Nations will remain as just another toothless body, unless the superpowers are revoked of their veto power. Superpowers are invading third world nations such as Afghanistan, Falklands, Yemen, Palestine, Iraq, Libya, and Syria, and the UN can't do anything as the invaders are using their veto power to stall any intervention from the UN.

What I find totally amazing is how this is allowed to fester for decades. The death and destruction is obviously horrendous. What exactly is the purpose of the United Nations? Is it really good for anything as regards peace in the world?

Fighting moving from rural areas to cities results in more destruction. It should be avoided.

The PKK never targets civilians, unlike the Turkish armed forces. And that is exactly why Erdoğan created a ghost organization called Teyrêbazên Azadiya Kurdistan, to blame the Kurds for suicide bombings. For me the main difference is that the PKK is fighting against the ISIS and Al Nusra, while the Turkish armed forces are supporting these terrorist factions.

More bombings in Turkey...

DIYARBAKIR, TURKEY (AFP) - Two Turkish soldiers were killed and more than 50 people wounded when a car bomb exploded at a military post in Turkey's restive Kurdish-dominated south-east, Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said on Tuesday (April 12).

Turkish authorities blamed the attack on the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), which has killed hundreds of members of the security forces in a resurgent campaign of violence in the last few months.

Davutoglu denounced the "vile attack" accusing what he termed the "terrorist organisation" of resorting to such attacks whenever it was backed into corner, in reference to the PKK.

The attack late on Monday targeted a military outpost in the Hani district of Diyarbakir province and left 52 people injured, including civilians.

They´ve killed lots of soldiers and police over the years but as I understand it they don´t usually target civilians. PKK that is.

Kurdish people in Turkey are all patriots and they don't support terror... They have their own political party in parliament and they have members in other parties. So, kurds have representers in parliament who defend their rights. But PKK, terrorist organisation claims founding a new state in spite of kurds. They are killing civilians, soldiers and polices by assasinations, bombings and direct attacking.

'Sexists' and 'perverts': insults rock Turkish politics

AFP
April 8, 2016

Istanbul (AFP) - President Recep Tayyip Erdogan slammed an allegedly sexist remark by Turkey's opposition leader as an "affront" to all Turkish women on Friday, further fueling a colourful war of words which erupted earlier in the week.

The verbal spat started when the leader of the Republican People’s Party (CHP), Kemal Kilicdaroglu, accused Family Minister Sema Ramazanoglu of "laying down in front of someone", to criticise her handling of recent cases of sexual abuse in schools.

The remark prompted outrage with the ruling party accusing Kilicdarogul of sexism and "immorality".

"What will we do with these political perverts?" Erdogan said on Wednesday, in comments carried by local media.

He said every word used by his opposition rival was "unnecessary, like Kilicdaroglu himself."

Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu meanwhile accused the opposition chief of being "inhumane" and declared he had unfollowed him from Twitter as a result of his remarks.

As the scandal mushroomed, the family minister Ramazanoglu decided Thursday that enough was enough and pressed charges against Kilicdarogul for "mental anguish and violating her personal rights", reported the pro-government Daily Sabah, adding she sought 50,000 Turkish Lira (15,000 euros, $17,000) in damages.

"I believe these unfortunate statements have bothered all female members of the CHP and also Kilicdaroglu’s wife," she said in a statement, reported by Hurriyet daily news.

Kilicdaroglu fired back at the criticism, saying it was in fact Erdogan who was guilty of "perversion", after the president said recently that the way some young people dressed or showed public affection was not in line with his values.

"Is it your job to sit at (the presidential palace) and look at the girls and women?" he said.

Kilicdaroglu has denied his original remark was sexist.

With the debate showing no sign of dying down, Erdogan brought it up again Friday after finishing prayers at a mosque, saying the remark was "an affront to all the women of Turkey".

Erdogan himself has raised eyebrows over his comments about women, urging Turkish women to have at least three children and railing against efforts to promote birth control as "treason".

Critics have accused his government of trying to impose strict Islamic values on Turkey and curtailing women's civil liberties.

In March he marked International Women's Day with the comment: "I know there will be some who will be annoyed, but for me a woman is above all a mother."

Thousands of women protested his remark in Istanbul with chants of "We want equality".

The president is also exceedingly touchy at any hint of an slur against him, with dozens of cases ongoing against journalists and cartoonists accused of insulting him.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/sexists-perverts-insults-rock-turkish-politics-174442248.html?nhp=1

That is exactly why the bloodshed is going on there.

And let me tell you one thing. No one can impose their rule over a particular ethnic group or culture by force in the long-term. In the short-term it might work. But as time progresses, the occupying force will find it harder and harder to maintain the status quo. If you have any doubt, then just ask the Indonesians about East Timor.

I live in that country and you hell know better than me!? Turkey kills terrorists and arrests who support terrorist organisation..Nobody can seperate our homeland by founding new state. That land was gotten by blood and it will given back by blood.

Go through these links:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_of_Kurdish_people_in_Turkey

http://www.kurdishacademy.org/?q=node/129