Wouldn't it be harmful for your chances to go for a 100x gain to choose a conservative approach for 50% of your portfolio?
Isn't the potential of 100x growth enough reward so that busting out in some scenarios is an accaptable outcome?
Perhaps. That would be a different risk tolerance level for sure. I'm trying to build a "medium risk" portfolio with a better than average chance to make the minimum target, and when the conservative 50% has a very reasonable chance to revalue by as much as 25 times over, then you've almost got the best of both worlds and something that in itself could easily satisfy the 100 grand minimum target. Said in other terms, I put the odds of LTC being worth 25 times what it is now much higher than I put those for BTS or STREEM to revalue 250 times over (which I do think is rational and doable in any event). Rather than a bunch of busts, you could get eternal double dribblers, and at some point you must move on. But perhaps your idea is better. Who knows? Post your list and we'll watch the two along side (or just watch the same one I posted ex-LTC). At the end of the day, it's mainly a risk tolerance question on my part as I am very portfolio diversified in nature, and there will also most likely be strokes of luck that will seperate the two regardless. The potential max reward doubles or triples though.
And what makes you trust yourself so much that you believe LTC will turn 25 times what it is currently? I can not agree upon
BTS or STREEM to revalue 250 times over
this is not possible, and it is completely irrational. The main reason behind that is, bitcoin will be gaining more attention than these assets, which drop in volume with daily trading. The winner would be the who holds BTC and not LTC, nor STREEM. I am believe of bitcoin when it comes to the competition at the end of the day. Yes it true that
The potential max reward doubles or triples though
because every coin has that much potential to gain that profit for the time being. Hope you guys end up with some sort of conclusion.