Topic: [Type-1 Flag] Account Sales (Read 1072 times)

Removed a flag. Up.

I am sure you will find the time.

Keeping it simple is better.

---

He confirmed that we've been in bed since forever while answering to some trolls. You just need to find it.

Yes, the complications would even generate a lot of heat around about the account trading topic. You can imagine it..

---

An off topic question just out of interests sorry.

Did theymos gave you that good looking costume title feature because you were in bed with him ? I mean I have seen costume titles on just mods and donator's profile around.

His suggestion/request just overcomplicates the situation even further. Next thing you know, they'll want me to run behavioural analysis to confirm that it isn't the same user and then run standardized assessments on whether their overall presence is more harmful than beneficial. I'm going to reject it clearly, and continue with the proposed work.

That would just mean forum going against it's own rule of accounts sales being allowed here.

The type-1 flag tagging looks good approach to mark sold accounts but there must be a universal format for that.
It will be good if someone can come up with a format that can be used as a template. Some mandatory fields should be there in the flag.


Here is the one I'll suggest to use
Flag is to notify you all that the account is sold on [Date] for [Amount] BTC. Trading with this account without an escrow could be highly risky. We recommend you to use due diligence before dealing with this account.

Stop pretending. You know what I mean - all that crap in September based on poorly-translated posts.

Due to an agreement reached with certain persons, the flag was resolved and I agreed not to discuss that flag. (make of that what you will)


Indeed? So this post is wrong?

---

Now we're both off topic.  Have archived our exchange in case the OP chooses to delete our posts.

Please. How can you say "no-one"? Plenty of users have told you when you were wrong, in this thread for example: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/flag-lutpin-known-alt-donation-funds-5157840

Or the conflict with the Turkish users. Those are just the two recent episodes that exhausted my patience. I'm sure other users could tell you a lot more if you were willing to listen.

Eh? Consistently? Do you know something I don't?

Given how no-one at the time I post something ever says "you are wrong because " how am I to know that a post is "wrong" in their eyes?

Out of the more than (stab in the dark) one thousand negatives I've given out one or two UID's come forward months or even years later and scream Butt Hurt ^TM that they've been hard done by causing you good people on DT to nod and slap me with distrust.  Does that make you feel better?  Show me where *you* have said I am so "wrong" about a post - any post that you now have me on your distrust list.

---

Hey OP when you next log in as that user - any chance of responding to my question posted prior in this thread?

I'm sorry you feel that way. I didn't intend to give you any "undertaking", merely to express my opinion about some of your ratings if and when I have free time to review them, which is complicated by how many controversial situations you constantly find yourself in. It appears you interpreted it as us working on a "project". Probably a miscommunication on my part.

Off topic here anyway. Feel free to create a separate thread before marlboroza Lauda kicks us out of here.

I would if I thought you had done something wrong.

I would have preferred if you had followed through with the undertaking you gave me some months ago, but it turns out you were just giving me lip-service and stringing me along.

Don't worry, he'll be punished for the slip-up in our weekly alt meeting.

What answer do you want? Feel free to flag and red-trust me any way you see fit.

Now that's funny - I directed my comment to @suchmoon, yet you (marlboroza) gave the answer he should have...

Your argument is bogus, people are not going to essentially be trawling through your shitty trust sheet looking for links to the ORIGINAL SALES PITCH when it should not have been deleted in the first place. Imagine every scammer editing the evidence used to demonstrate they are scum bags and then they say ...Well someone linked to the original somewhere so we can alter what we like and it does not look shady as hell.

LOL where is timelords FOR SALE THREAD? SO why does timelord have to prove it is not sold???  really since any person can put a " no longer for sale and never really was it was all a joke" message up after it is sold.
The rule should be IF YOU PUT YOUR ACCOUNT FOR SALE IT GETS FLAGGED end of  story.

Also selling your account is not the worst part of it at all. YOU WERE CERTAIN SELLING AN ACCOUNT WAS SCAM FACILITATING and you were screaming anyone selling their account was scam facilitating and should be make a pariah. THEN YOU PUT YOUR ACCOUNT FOR SALE for 0.3btc .  The intention is clearly financially motivated wrong doing.  

You gave into greed and now you must pay the same as everyone else. Yours was a particularly nasty one since in your mind you were facilitating scamming for a price.

There is no thirst for vengeance, the thirst people including ch likely has is for TRANSPARENT RULES THAT ARE APPLIED EQUALLY TO ALL MEMBERS.

The fact is there is more compelling evidence your account was sold than for the others getting a flag. ALSO they were not certain they were deliberately facilitating scams like you were and have not deleted their histories in shame.

Now shut up and enjoy being our bitch where ever account sales are ever mentioned at any time in the future by your scum bag colluding dt scamming pals.

@moronbozo.

stop crying trolling , that faux defense was destroyed every time you tried to use it to mask observable instances of wrong doing. Crying trolling to try to prevent justice is UNTRUSTWORTHY and should perhaps have a flag for trying to protect scammers.

Get the flag on  nutildah you weasel and stfu.

Timelord is the first person here with some real balls who is not totally corrupt it seems. There are others that are not corrupt but they have no balls.  Sure timelord can be a total asshole but at least he seems to apply his principles to every member without being a chicken shit wimp. We will glady suffer some of his over zealous flags and tags if he takes the same stance on every member here fairly and equally.

Let's hope he finds the dirty turds thread and follows those links and does some real investigative work on those too soon.

TLDR - more compelling evidence nutildah account is sold than the others getting flagged but his pals won't flag him or tag him.

 People complain about his timelords overzealous tags (perhaps some are) however there are no incidents of financially motivated wrong doing in his past, and he is not tagging whistle blowers for whistle blowing , however if you swear too much at him or other members you make get a tag. Treats every member the same from what we can see. NOT CORRUPT is a vast improvement over the colluding scum there atm.

Don't support any of laudas flags until he puts up nutildah on his account sellers list. There can be no denying he is an account seller. He has deleted the sales pitch but it is the backed up off site.

It can't be moderated thread because it is used for flags 

Either create flag and post it here or don't, both things have already been discussed dozen times, I don't see any other reason to point them again except for trolling purposes.

Great rebuttal  

I just don't understand what it is you think you are accomplishing besides being a magnificent asshole. Or how you can continue to wonder why most people find you useless.

Edit: oh, I see, you fixed your feedback link while pretending to not understand what I was taking about... real classy.

Precious little wall flower ... what *are* you on about?

From BPIP: https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Nutildah



That's quite a lot of password changes for an account the DIDN'T change hands... Or, was it (your account) used as collateral?

---

Hey OP: Are we also going to add all the account sellers?  Or, what about the ones who held accounts as collateral?

I think you just proved that (yet again). This is pretty off-topic as this is Lauda's thread about their tags, not yours. However,

1. You fucked up your reference link.
2. Its been impossible for me to "cover my tracks" since October 4th, 2016. How can someone just read some of my feedback but skip that one? Thus, what am I "covering up"?
3. My previous feedback is all negative with the exception of an erroneously left positive feedback and a positive I received for buying a NEM shirt in 2014 (from a member who was never DT).
4. As far as there being "no guarantee the account was or was not sold," what guarantee do I have your account wasn't sold? Or anybody's for that matter? There are no guarantees. What there is, however, is a little bit of common fucking sense, which most people have but you (and other of my critics on this issue) seem to be lacking.

Seriously, do you like to get hammered before you leave trust feedback, or else what's wrong with you?

I'm sick of addressing this issue. Nothing new has come to light. Nothing has changed. I was pretty much just an angry troll up until 2017 and the positive reputation I have is built is all thanks to deeds performed after that. Perhaps Timelord's rating (however erroneous) will quench cryptohunter's thirst for vengeance, but I doubt it. Oh well. Mods please feel free to delete this shit if its off-topic.