Several folks have been insisting to make donations so here is the address you can send UFO Coins:
BtNVgsr4vGubz2GAjFwD38XU8iSbAYfTqZ
The funds will be used primarily for marketing purposes
Thanks a lot!
Topic: UFO Coin New Team, Client, Future Plans and NeoScrypt - page 11. (Read 55930 times)
radeon 7990 here...
What is your WU ?
200 What is your WU ?
radeon 7990 here...
What is your WU ?
What is your WU ?
hmm 138khs for a while but the amd driver crashes after 5 minutes...
this is tested with radeon, try find optimal size to your card
hmm 138khs for a while but the amd driver crashes after 5 minutes...
hmmm.. lets check it out then 
is that 3.7.6 ?
is that 3.7.6 ?3.7.5
havent seen any update on 3.5.6 yet , so better to tell people not to use it for now
hmmm.. lets check it out then is that 3.7.6 ?
is that 3.7.6 ? Yep, a lot of work has been put into this and good progress has been made so far. The switch to the new algorithm is very close as the bugs in the miner are being cleared out. I urge more folks to test the miner and report whatever issues they might come up across
some news today ,thanks to rynomite i got my hashrate upto 80khs/gpudropped worksize to 24 ---worksize 24
pcx profitality is now in place 3 after dark and startcoin, its not a bad sign
Yep, a lot of work has been put into this and good progress has been made so far. The switch to the new algorithm is very close as the bugs in the miner are being cleared out. I urge more folks to test the miner and report whatever issues they might come up across
Have you tried I 10~13 ?
This is what I get on win 7 at I-12 which is much faster than I-13...
This is what I get on win 7 at I-12 which is much faster than I-13...
try 3.7.5 to be sure its not because the new miner
some wild guess try replacing this file from 3.7.5 :
http://www.filedropper.com/neoscrypt140909
or the whole 3.7.5 source:
http://www.filedropper.com/neo-375
EDIT:
3.7.6x kernel seems to be somehow broken for radeon
use neoscrypt140909.cl (and delete binfiles after replacing file) from my link or 3.7.5 source, its best u can try now, if u dont want go back to 3.7.5
we are waiting for the solution..
Have you tried I 10~13 ?
This is what I get on win 7 at I-12 which is much faster than I-13...
This is what I get on win 7 at I-12 which is much faster than I-13...
Hello,
I want try https://github.com/vehre/neo-gpuminer , but I getting only HW errors.
I compiled it under 32bit xubuntu 12.04 LTS (ATI HD 7700 serie, 2GB computer ram) with Catalyst 13.04 (second try with 13.12). Scrypt, X11, quark can be mined fine on this computer.
I don't know what I made wrongly.
I clone repository, I used this commands:
Autogen output
I want try https://github.com/vehre/neo-gpuminer , but I getting only HW errors.
I compiled it under 32bit xubuntu 12.04 LTS (ATI HD 7700 serie, 2GB computer ram) with Catalyst 13.04 (second try with 13.12). Scrypt, X11, quark can be mined fine on this computer.
I don't know what I made wrongly.
I clone repository, I used this commands:
Code:
git clone https://github.com/vehre/neo-gpuminer
cd neo-gpuminer
./autogen.sh
make
./cgminer -o [pool] -u [worker name] -p [password] -I 11 --neoscrypt
Autogen output
Code:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
cgminer 3.7.6b
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Configuration Options Summary:
libcurl(GBT+getwork).: Enabled: -lcurl
curses.TUI...........: FOUND: -lncurses
OpenCL...............: FOUND. GPU mining support enabled
scrypt...............: Disabled
keccak...............: Disabled
neoscrypt............: Enabled
ADL..................: SDK NOT found, GPU monitoring support DISABLED
NVML.................: SDK NOT found, GPU monitoring support DISABLED
Avalon.ASICs.........: Disabled
BFL.ASICs............: Disabled
BitForce.FPGAs.......: Disabled
BitFury.ASICs........: Disabled
Icarus.FPGAs.........: Disabled
Klondike.ASICs.......: Disabled
ModMiner.FPGAs.......: Disabled
Compilation............: make (or gmake)
CPPFLAGS.............:
CFLAGS...............: -g -O2
LDFLAGS..............: -lpthread
LDADD................: -lcurl compat/jansson-2.5/src/.libs/libjansson.a -lpthread -lOpenCL -lncurses -lm -lrt
Installation...........: make install (as root if needed, with 'su' or 'sudo')
prefix...............: /usr/local
seeking answer..
vehre from ftc forum:
"That looks quite fine. Please retry mining setting intensity significantly lower, I.e. to 8 or even less (-i
" edit:there seems to be some other guy with same problem, will info when there is any
It started work with intensity 7. But hasrate with this intensity is around 2Kh/s, my proceseor higher hasrate than gpu
seems ftc guys are updating their core to 0.9.3..
it would be no trick to kick ufo in to same core(it may ease the fork in the future)
this just cave me crazy idea, could there be a multiwallet for having more than 1 coin in same wallet? is there any use of that?
it would be no trick to kick ufo in to same core(it may ease the fork in the future)
this just cave me crazy idea, could there be a multiwallet for having more than 1 coin in same wallet? is there any use of that?
it is a good idea that has been around for some time but I still havent seen a working example...
about the core thing... u have any info about future plans?
seems ftc guys are updating their core to 0.9.3..
it would be no trick to kick ufo in to same core(it may ease the fork in the future)
this just cave me crazy idea, could there be a multiwallet for having more than 1 coin in same wallet? is there any use of that?
it would be no trick to kick ufo in to same core(it may ease the fork in the future)
this just cave me crazy idea, could there be a multiwallet for having more than 1 coin in same wallet? is there any use of that?
it is a good idea that has been around for some time but I still havent seen a working example...
seems ftc guys are updating their core to 0.9.3..
it would be no trick to kick ufo in to same core(it may ease the fork in the future)
this just cave me crazy idea, could there be a multiwallet for having more than 1 coin in same wallet? is there any use of that?
it would be no trick to kick ufo in to same core(it may ease the fork in the future)
this just cave me crazy idea, could there be a multiwallet for having more than 1 coin in same wallet? is there any use of that?
Folks, we need a shoulder to make our own block explorer. If you like to help us please check the bounty at: http://ufocoin.co/job/abe-for-ufo-coin
thanks
Temporary blockexplorer is now available at http://dutchpool.org:2760 thanks
Folks, we need a shoulder to make our own block explorer. If you like to help us please check the bounty at: http://ufocoin.co/job/abe-for-ufo-coin
thanks
thanks
Note: I am the Owner/operator of Cryptocoinexplorer.com.
The previous sponsor of the UFO explorer on CCE conveyed that they were no longer going to sponsor the UFO explorer.
I guess I am going to plea the case for somebody taking over sponsorship on CCE .
The monthly sponsorship of UFO on CCE is $25.00 a month.
This includes the CCE 3.5 explorer (Not ABE based, completely original code), hosted and maintained, the use of the explorer node as a seed, and CCE 3.5 is still being developed with new features. All by a professional who has both ran and written explorer software for over two years.
vs.
Somebody getting ABE up and running with UFO, trying to get and keep it stable, pay for hosting and maintain it all. I know from my experience with ABE over the last couple of years that one is going to have a hard time finding a VPS with the capabilities to run ABE in stable fashion with decent traffic for under $25.00 a month. That is just one of the reasons I wrote CCE 3.5.
Ultimately it is up to the community to decide what is best for it. I just wanted to make sure that information is there for you to decide.
i fully agree this is a good choice. But ufo team has changed and they want to stand by they own.
i feel it would be best to keep up with your explorer until ufo has working solution of their own.
so im supporting this issue saying i will personally pay 1 month fee by my self for now.
so we are good to go with old explorer still one month.
ufo team has now time to do changes smoothly.
Folks, we need a shoulder to make our own block explorer. If you like to help us please check the bounty at: http://ufocoin.co/job/abe-for-ufo-coin
thanks
thanks
Note: I am the Owner/operator of Cryptocoinexplorer.com.
The previous sponsor of the UFO explorer on CCE conveyed that they were no longer going to sponsor the UFO explorer.
I guess I am going to plea the case for somebody taking over sponsorship on CCE .
The monthly sponsorship of UFO on CCE is $25.00 a month.
This includes the CCE 3.5 explorer (Not ABE based, completely original code), hosted and maintained, the use of the explorer node as a seed, and CCE 3.5 is still being developed with new features. All by a professional who has both ran and written explorer software for over two years.
vs.
Somebody getting ABE up and running with UFO, trying to get and keep it stable, pay for hosting and maintain it all. I know from my experience with ABE over the last couple of years that one is going to have a hard time finding a VPS with the capabilities to run ABE in stable fashion with decent traffic for under $25.00 a month. That is just one of the reasons I wrote CCE 3.5.
Ultimately it is up to the community to decide what is best for it. I just wanted to make sure that information is there for you to decide.
Folks, we need a shoulder to make our own block explorer. If you like to help us please check the bounty at: http://ufocoin.co/job/abe-for-ufo-coin
thanks
thanks
Hello,
I want try https://github.com/vehre/neo-gpuminer , but I getting only HW errors.
I compiled it under 32bit xubuntu 12.04 LTS (ATI HD 7700 serie, 2GB computer ram) with Catalyst 13.04 (second try with 13.12). Scrypt, X11, quark can be mined fine on this computer.
I don't know what I made wrongly.
I clone repository, I used this commands:
Autogen output
I want try https://github.com/vehre/neo-gpuminer , but I getting only HW errors.
I compiled it under 32bit xubuntu 12.04 LTS (ATI HD 7700 serie, 2GB computer ram) with Catalyst 13.04 (second try with 13.12). Scrypt, X11, quark can be mined fine on this computer.
I don't know what I made wrongly.
I clone repository, I used this commands:
Code:
git clone https://github.com/vehre/neo-gpuminer
cd neo-gpuminer
./autogen.sh
make
./cgminer -o [pool] -u [worker name] -p [password] -I 11 --neoscrypt
Autogen output
Code:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
cgminer 3.7.6b
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Configuration Options Summary:
libcurl(GBT+getwork).: Enabled: -lcurl
curses.TUI...........: FOUND: -lncurses
OpenCL...............: FOUND. GPU mining support enabled
scrypt...............: Disabled
keccak...............: Disabled
neoscrypt............: Enabled
ADL..................: SDK NOT found, GPU monitoring support DISABLED
NVML.................: SDK NOT found, GPU monitoring support DISABLED
Avalon.ASICs.........: Disabled
BFL.ASICs............: Disabled
BitForce.FPGAs.......: Disabled
BitFury.ASICs........: Disabled
Icarus.FPGAs.........: Disabled
Klondike.ASICs.......: Disabled
ModMiner.FPGAs.......: Disabled
Compilation............: make (or gmake)
CPPFLAGS.............:
CFLAGS...............: -g -O2
LDFLAGS..............: -lpthread
LDADD................: -lcurl compat/jansson-2.5/src/.libs/libjansson.a -lpthread -lOpenCL -lncurses -lm -lrt
Installation...........: make install (as root if needed, with 'su' or 'sudo')
prefix...............: /usr/local
seeking answer..
vehre from ftc forum:
"That looks quite fine. Please retry mining setting intensity significantly lower, I.e. to 8 or even less (-i
" edit:there seems to be some other guy with same problem, will info when there is any
Jump to: