The reason, well at least the main reason would be the fact that in the smaller nations it is easier for politicians to be corrupt. I know that makes sense to people who lived in a small nation, and maybe people who live in 100+ million population type of places may not understand this.
But, when you live in a nation with a small population, a small economy, and of course a small number of voters total, that means that you could be corrupt and you can get away with it, because you are reaching out to a lot of people with your corruption and getting their vote as well. You could literally have a few industry giants in your pocket, keep being a president thanks to that, and control the whole media since it is only a few channels.
You couldn't be more wrong on this one.
If large countries over 100 million would be less corrupt then probably Russia, China, India, Mexico and Brazil will be don't eh top of the list of model countries, right?
In reality, look who's leading the pack
Denmark, New Zealand, Finland, Singapore and Sweden, all five of them barely make 30 million in population.
Size has nothing to do, be it land or population.
I think everything is just beginning. The most interesting is ahead. Great Britain has chosen the course of the movement for itself and these are its results. Continuing to move at such a pace, the country will be ruined. The country can move far, far back in the time of the dinosaurs. Well, we'll see what happens next. What else will the old woman have enough strength...
Oh yeah, backward-going Britain, that keeps getting ruined and ruined, yet still able to design every damn chip in mobile phones nowadays.
This is like the commies waiting in bread lines for the US to collapse.