Quickseller [...] I need extra profit [...]because [...] situaction [...] with money but I cant do that without this signature campaign
The fact that you want to use the forum to make money is generally not taken into consideration when deciding to unban someone. In order to participate in the forum, you need to follow the rules, and (claiming to) not knowing the rules is not an excuse to not follow the rules, especially the major ones, such as making a large volume of low quality posts that do not contribute to the conversation at hand, and copying content from elsewhere.
Violations of both of the above rules severely degrade the ability of others to read and discuss topics of interest -- in other words cause a lot of problems.
It is reasonable to say that you do not need warnings to not copy content from others, as this should be common sense that this does not contribute to the conversation. Every time that you had a post deleted should serve as a warning (as this is what it was), and if you were getting a lot of posts deleted, then you should have contacted a moderator to find out what you were doing wrong, and corrected this.
[...] still didn't understand that you're not welcome here? Fuck off.
[...] I'm glad that you are banned. [...]
Leave and don't come back.
A bit harsh..I'd rather appreciate man's honesty.
So just because he admitted to breaking the rules (after doing it more than
5 times) he should be treated nicely? No.
The OP is an idiot and a waste of the forum's resources.
The OP actually admitted to breaking rules that he learned about after the fact (in other words he was not aware of the rules at the time of the violation). It is the expected behavior to break a rule multiple times if a person is not aware of said rule. While I do agree that the fact that the OP engaged in copy/paste posts makes it appropriate to ban him, your logic is flawed.