Actually I believe it's a spam attack.
We've had it about a week ago too, back then the mempool rose to 23MB then and it took one day to clean up and get to normal.
Now I see again a rise to 16MB yesterday and one more started last night and still continuing, now reaching about 28MB. Somebody is clearly trying something... it's ugly and needs time to clean.. after the spam stops...
Seems like it, but that's a pretty crappy attack these days. These spam attacks used to be very disruptive, but now the mempool cleanser has been introduced (I think that was version 0.12) as well as compact blocks, the sole effect is to push fees up a little. I really hope whoever is behind it is feeling frustrated at how little they can disrupt the network these days.
Have had my rather larger sends of bitcoin not confirmed and it has been close to 18-20 hours now.
The tx fees that were sent to cover the miner's fees were as per usual.
Over 0.0008btc should of been enough to cover the sent amount and have them delivered by now.
If this is an ongoing trend then I expect not to see many people trading bitcoin until this issue with the blockchain has been resolved.
Yes, I have also noticed that in the past day, the mempool has been quite backed up.
https://blockchain.info/charts/mempool-size?timespan=1weekI have not seen much explanation from anybody regarding what is going on exactly.
The back-up from last week lasted for about 12 hours.
I'm thinking that there is some kind of spam attack going on, because exponential peaks, like this, just do not make much sense.
As we can see from the linked blockchain.info chart, blockchain.info has only been providing (and tracking) mempool fullness data since early May 2016.
I have a current transaction has been stuck for almost 19 hours, as I type, and zero confirmations, and the one that I had last week was backed up for nearly 3 hours. Most of my other previously long transactions were about 90 minutes.... otherwise most of my transactions had tended to go through in less than an hour.
I am thinking that the big blocker, blocksize limit arguing folks are kind of losing credibility with seg wit about to go live, and they may be attempting to get some attention to the matter by spamming the blockchain for the next few months.. That's my current theory and thinking based on my lack of information regarding some of the specifics, and my ongoing witnessing of the level of desperation, contradiction and bitcoin sabotaging that sometimes seems to be coming out of some folks from that big-blocker nutjobs camp.
Same here brother.
Had one last week not confirm until 4-5 hours and was getting worried that it would not fully and completely send to the recipient for 20 hours and I would have to refund them until it did.