Topic: Unified ASICMINER orderbook - page 9. (Read 16393 times)

Cancel 123

Again, just noticrd my.retardness. Ignore me. Thanks

My.ask was for 250 shares not 128

bid [email protected]

Orderbook

PostID	User	Amount	Price
25	nanopene	10000	0.10
1	ineededausername	10000	0.10
10	Goat	2000	0.25
11	zefir	2000	0.35
40	luffy	50	0.36
44	Vezunchik	100	0.41
6	BlackLilac	200	0.435
3	TradeFortress	90	0.45
53	ineededausername	64	0.50
107	Vezunchik	50	0.51
72	superbit	50	0.51
76	Goat	1000	0.55
73	HorseRider	150	0.55
87	Franktank	50	0.60
85	btcash	100	0.60
81	wisard	50	0.60
112	BlackLilac	50	0.62
106	rudrigorc2	200	0.62
102	22naru	100	0.62
98	bitcad	50	0.62
123	helixone	250	0.63
129	SebastianJu	168	0.68
130	MarkyRamone	50	0.72
120	JaredR26	150	0.72
Bids
----
Asks
94	gsan	800	0.72
92	zefir	400	0.75
15	kibblesnbits	100	0.90
2	ianbakewell	100	1.00
95	xkrikl	500	1.10
101	Vezunchik	50	1.19
89	Goat	500	1.20
128	lophie	250	2.00

---

Invalid Orders:

Orders in Execution:

• 150 @ 0.72: gsan (94) -> JaredR26 (120)
• 50 @ 0.72: gsan (94) -> MarkyRamone (130)

Bid 50 @ 0.72

I raise my offer 118 again to buy [email protected]...

ask 250@2

Orderbook

PostID	User	Amount	Price
25	nanopene	10000	0.10
1	ineededausername	10000	0.10
10	Goat	2000	0.25
11	zefir	2000	0.35
40	luffy	50	0.36
44	Vezunchik	100	0.41
6	BlackLilac	200	0.435
3	TradeFortress	90	0.45
53	ineededausername	64	0.50
107	Vezunchik	50	0.51
72	superbit	50	0.51
76	Goat	1000	0.55
73	HorseRider	150	0.55
87	Franktank	50	0.60
85	btcash	100	0.60
81	wisard	50	0.60
112	BlackLilac	50	0.62
106	rudrigorc2	200	0.62
102	22naru	100	0.62
98	bitcad	50	0.62
123	helixone	250	0.63
118	SebastianJu	168	0.64
120	JaredR26	150	0.72
Bids
----
Asks
94	gsan	800	0.72
92	zefir	400	0.75
15	kibblesnbits	100	0.90
2	ianbakewell	100	1.00
95	xkrikl	500	1.10
101	Vezunchik	50	1.19
89	Goat	500	1.20

---

Invalid Orders:

Orders in Execution:

• 150 @ 0.72: gsan (94) -> JaredR26 (120)

crap, just noticed the 50shares minimum. just ignore me. sorry.

Bid [email protected]

I used this list when I searched for escrows for my recent auction.


I'm just saying that it is more likely to make a mistake when manually updating some spreadsheet with 173 shares than with 100 or 200. It sounds trivial, but with increasing volume those numbers become hard to maintain, at least that's what I learned while updating this list

Bid [email protected]

withdraw 86

John(John K) aka John (John the Dong) is good escrow.

Buy 150 @ 0.72 (from gsan)

withdraw id 117 (50 @ 0.65)

zefir... you state escrow is standard anyhow but i didnt find a hint here who offers such escrow service and maybe did this in a good manner in the past already. Can you give infos about who to contact?

The number of shares is because i now own a number of shares that isnt a round number and i want to change this. Its good that its possible and i think at some point it will happen anyway when an offer isnt fully fulfilled. I guess friedcat will calculate with calculator anyway because the values moved arent small. At least i wouldnt risk an error at that point.

And i would raise my offer to Buy 168 @ 0.64 using bitcent...

ask 50 @ 0.65

Notes

1) I first wanted to refuse SebastianJu's quote, but after re-checking the rules in the OP I realized ineededausername stated them not precisely enough. I initially proposed to have a minimum unit size to ease friedcat's manual database updates. Now rule 1 states a minimum quantity of 50, but this can be interpreted differently, arguing that a quote for 51 shares is ok while 49 is not. Not going to change the rules now, but in your own interest please try to keep the transactions block based.

2) Same goes for the pricing: there is no rule on increments, at the same time placing quotes up to Satoshis does not help you much, while it imposes a higher risk to be mis-typed or wrongly copy-pasted. Please try to limit yourself and whenever possible quote prices in full Bitcents (N * 0.01).

3) the binding character of your quotes seems to be worth a clarification (have been asked for in PM): posts in the auction sub-forum are binding (and therefore immutable). If you post a quote that is executable within the current orderbook, you enter a binding agreement. If the other party refuses to process the trade, you can report him to moderators and file a request for tagging him as scammer. As in other auction platforms, if a quote is obviously erroneous (like best ask is 0.72 and someone posts an ask for 0.07) it can be invalidated ex post. This relies on all participants to have some sort of common sense and fairness, but since we are all sane folks this should be no problem.

4) re escrow: this is to be decided and processed mutually by the trading parties. No need to state that your quote is dependent on escrow (which should be standard anyhow).


Thanks for your support