University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7's Collapse on 9/11 - page 8.

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: BluePowder on May 03, 2020, 06:15:56 PM

What's going on 8th graders ?

I posted images of pentagon with no sign of planes 10hrs ago and I haven't been debunked by someone with a gr8 education ?

What the hell is going. at least call me a conspiracy theorist or bow to the master at once.

Posting pictures is common with 911 conspiracy theorists.

However, a picture is not a question, an assertion, or a proof. a picture is ... a picture. You may see things in a picture or consider them some how as proof, but that may not be obvious to others.

So, like... What's up, Dude?

BluePowder

jr. member

Activity: 203

Merit: 3

What's going on 8th graders ?

I posted images of pentagon with no sign of planes 10hrs ago and I haven't been debunked by someone with a gr8 education ?

What the hell is going. at least call me a conspiracy theorist or bow to the master at once.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Spendulus on May 03, 2020, 11:40:12 AM

Quote from: BADecker on May 03, 2020, 09:30:00 AM

....the University presented a scientifically accurate model that shows that fires didn't bring Bldg. 7 down.

Cool

You mean two Chinese disinformation agents produced a propaganda report.

Their names are right there on it.

No, I mean the University that accepts the study as correct. See the OP.

Cool

EDIT: Do you and your significant other sleep on separate shifts, just so that he can wake you whenever a new post from BADecker comes in?

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: BADecker on May 03, 2020, 09:30:00 AM

....the University presented a scientifically accurate model that shows that fires didn't bring Bldg. 7 down.

Cool

You mean two Chinese disinformation agents produced a propaganda report.

Their names are right there on it.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Spendulus on May 03, 2020, 01:05:02 AM

Quote from: BADecker on May 02, 2020, 09:24:25 PM

....
Hey, thanks for the welcome. But I have done it several times, now. Perhaps you could explain for each piece of dust and each girder, exactly how 8th grade science fits it. I mean, explain it for all of the trillions of specks of concrete dust individually.

Cool

No thanks. You don't have a conspiracy theory that requires that.

Actually, you have a rather interesting theory, but one which is implausibly complicated, and which requires science beyond our current understanding. In fact, if we just decided to create the absolute most impossible way to do 911, we really probably wouldn't get close to the impossible that you came up with.

If you are talking about nano-thermite as being science beyond our understanding, you are mistaken. Besides, just because you and I don't know something about some science, doesn't mean that others haven't figured it out. Nobody is required to tell us everything they know.

So, just be glad that the University presented a scientifically accurate model that shows that fires didn't bring Bldg. 7 down.

Cool

BluePowder

jr. member

Activity: 203

Merit: 3

Zero evidence of planes... I know, the plane tilted and the wings fell off the last second and must be hidden in the grass. Now you see who the real whack jobs are.. The peple who are still trying to advance this theory that America was under attack, it was but not by Muslims.

BluePowder

jr. member

Activity: 203

Merit: 3

No planes on 9/11 .. only idiots and conspiracy therorists believe that you can pull a pilot out of his seat and take over his ride and fly it perfectly into buildings. the real conspiracy is that muslims fly planes and the pentagon and military industrial complex are the nice people.

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: BluePowder on May 03, 2020, 01:44:17 AM

Quote from: Spendulus on May 02, 2020, 04:39:49 PM

Quote from: BluePowder on May 02, 2020, 04:22:30 PM

You haven't refuted shit, and you keep pretending this is some conspiracy from me but I'm just loosely explaining other people's work, which is open knowledge and you can verify it using your trusted source. which appears to be nothing but bugs bunny sources.

Even the controlled wikipedia makes some mention of energy weapons, the picture is obviously not proof of anything on its own but its proof of something you can't explain. you can try all you want but no fire or demolition ends up like that.

I got many more, just want to see how phony you are and how far you're willing to put your foot down your throat.

So what's your authoratative source ?

Sure, I've heard of energy weapons. I've also heard of "guns." Saying "guns" is not the same as saying Glock 26, 22 round extended magazine, fitted with Trijicon Reflex Sights.

So it's fair to say I have no idea what exactly you are talking about, right?

The reason I have not refuted anything is there has not been anything from you to refute. A picture, a vague mention of "energy weapon," etc.

what do you expect for evidence besides words and pictures in a forum. I can't describe and show everthing I picked up in the last 10 years in a couple of posts. There enough for you to see that something is very wrong with WTC 1 and 2 and some names to search if you care about. The tech for the weapon is common and documented so no conspiracy in its existence. The plane mounted ones owned by the open govt are all over google, the one used on 9/11 is different and there isn't going to be a working model shown but the tech behind it is the same, which I loosely explained as changing material properties at the molecular level.

You also don't accept anything so what does it matter, if its pics its not enough, if its a PHD its a whackjob, if its anything fire related you got it beat with gr8

So were the World Trade Centers put in a giant microwave oven?

BluePowder

jr. member

Activity: 203

Merit: 3

Quote from: Spendulus on May 02, 2020, 04:39:49 PM

Quote from: BluePowder on May 02, 2020, 04:22:30 PM

You haven't refuted shit, and you keep pretending this is some conspiracy from me but I'm just loosely explaining other people's work, which is open knowledge and you can verify it using your trusted source. which appears to be nothing but bugs bunny sources.

Even the controlled wikipedia makes some mention of energy weapons, the picture is obviously not proof of anything on its own but its proof of something you can't explain. you can try all you want but no fire or demolition ends up like that.

I got many more, just want to see how phony you are and how far you're willing to put your foot down your throat.

So what's your authoratative source ?

Sure, I've heard of energy weapons. I've also heard of "guns." Saying "guns" is not the same as saying Glock 26, 22 round extended magazine, fitted with Trijicon Reflex Sights.

So it's fair to say I have no idea what exactly you are talking about, right?

The reason I have not refuted anything is there has not been anything from you to refute. A picture, a vague mention of "energy weapon," etc.

what do you expect for evidence besides words and pictures in a forum. I can't describe and show everthing I picked up in the last 10 years in a couple of posts. There enough for you to see that something is very wrong with WTC 1 and 2 and some names to search if you care about. The tech for the weapon is common and documented so no conspiracy in its existence. The plane mounted ones owned by the open govt are all over google, the one used on 9/11 is different and there isn't going to be a working model shown but the tech behind it is the same, which I loosely explained as changing material properties at the molecular level.

You also don't accept anything so what does it matter, if its pics its not enough, if its a PHD its a whackjob, if its anything fire related you got it beat with gr8

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: BADecker on May 02, 2020, 09:24:25 PM

....
Hey, thanks for the welcome. But I have done it several times, now. Perhaps you could explain for each piece of dust and each girder, exactly how 8th grade science fits it. I mean, explain it for all of the trillions of specks of concrete dust individually.

Cool

No thanks. You don't have a conspiracy theory that requires that.

Actually, you have a rather interesting theory, but one which is implausibly complicated, and which requires science beyond our current understanding. In fact, if we just decided to create the absolute most impossible way to do 911, we really probably wouldn't get close to the impossible that you came up with.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Spendulus on May 02, 2020, 07:11:42 PM

Quote from: BADecker on May 02, 2020, 06:50:34 PM

Quote from: Spendulus on May 02, 2020, 06:41:47 PM

Quote from: BADecker on May 02, 2020, 06:39:05 PM

...
Don't worry. Spendy has some 8th graders who can explain this whole thing to you. Lol.

Cool

The grownups in the room don't even need to be involved, as we demolish crap anti-American, contrived theories about 911.

So, it's American big business, right? I mean, they killed a whole bunch of birds with one 9/11 stone.

Cool

You're welcome to explain your pet theory of the conspiracy of 911. I know you want to, even though you'll be acting as no more than a puppet of Iranians.

Hey, thanks for the welcome. But I have done it several times, now. Perhaps you could explain for each piece of dust and each girder, exactly how 8th grade science fits it. I mean, explain it for all of the trillions of specks of concrete dust individually.

Cool

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: BADecker on May 02, 2020, 06:50:34 PM

Quote from: Spendulus on May 02, 2020, 06:41:47 PM

Quote from: BADecker on May 02, 2020, 06:39:05 PM

...
Don't worry. Spendy has some 8th graders who can explain this whole thing to you. Lol.

Cool

The grownups in the room don't even need to be involved, as we demolish crap anti-American, contrived theories about 911.

So, it's American big business, right? I mean, they killed a whole bunch of birds with one 9/11 stone.

Cool

You're welcome to explain your pet theory of the conspiracy of 911. I know you want to, even though you'll be acting as no more than a puppet of Iranians.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Spendulus on May 02, 2020, 06:41:47 PM

Quote from: BADecker on May 02, 2020, 06:39:05 PM

...
Don't worry. Spendy has some 8th graders who can explain this whole thing to you. Lol.

Cool

The grownups in the room don't even need to be involved, as we demolish crap anti-American, contrived theories about 911.

So, it's American big business, right? I mean, they killed a whole bunch of birds with one 9/11 stone.

Cool

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: BADecker on May 02, 2020, 06:39:05 PM

...
Don't worry. Spendy has some 8th graders who can explain this whole thing to you. Lol.

Cool

The grownups in the room don't even need to be involved, as we demolish crap anti-American, contrived theories about 911.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: BluePowder on May 02, 2020, 04:22:30 PM

You haven't refuted shit, and you keep pretending this is some conspiracy from me but I'm just loosely explaining other people's work, which is open knowledge and you can verify it using your trusted source. which appears to be nothing but bugs bunny sources.

Even the controlled wikipedia makes some mention of energy weapons, the picture is obviously not proof of anything on its own but its proof of something you can't explain. you can try all you want but no fire or demolition ends up like that.

I got many more, just want to see how phony you are and how far you're willing to put your foot down your throat.

So what's your authoratative source ? For some its the Bible, for some its PHD experts, for some its wisdom of the crowd. you don't seem to have one, your only source seems to be your cousin.

Quote from: Spendulus on May 02, 2020, 10:45:18 AM

Quote from: BluePowder on May 01, 2020, 08:28:59 PM

I missed your comment on the magic fantasy energy weapon, Its called DEW or directed energy or focused energy....

What you did here was reply with a very general and vague reference to the "Star Wars programs."

And zero facts. Got anything more?

Quote from: BluePowder on May 01, 2020, 08:35:58 PM

It's just grade 8 science

TRUST US

Yes, I'm only refuting arguments using grade 8 science. Including your mistaken belief that dust in the air is evidence of some super weapon. Next you'll be referencing some "expert, Phd, Scientist, Engineer" right?

Be my guest. Because then your "expert, Phd, Scientist, Engineer" will be defeated by science at a child's level.

Don't worry. Spendy has some 8th graders who can explain this whole thing to you. Lol.

Cool

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: BluePowder on May 02, 2020, 04:22:30 PM

You haven't refuted shit, and you keep pretending this is some conspiracy from me but I'm just loosely explaining other people's work, which is open knowledge and you can verify it using your trusted source. which appears to be nothing but bugs bunny sources.

Even the controlled wikipedia makes some mention of energy weapons, the picture is obviously not proof of anything on its own but its proof of something you can't explain. you can try all you want but no fire or demolition ends up like that.

I got many more, just want to see how phony you are and how far you're willing to put your foot down your throat.

So what's your authoratative source ?

Sure, I've heard of energy weapons. I've also heard of "guns." Saying "guns" is not the same as saying Glock 26, 22 round extended magazine, fitted with Trijicon Reflex Sights.

So it's fair to say I have no idea what exactly you are talking about, right?

The reason I have not refuted anything is there has not been anything from you to refute. A picture, a vague mention of "energy weapon," etc.

BluePowder

jr. member

Activity: 203

Merit: 3

Quote from: BADecker on May 02, 2020, 08:47:51 AM

does covid 19 still seem like a conspiracy when the deep state is taking out entire trailer parks with the people still in them.

What is this a picture of? What are the circumstances? Where can we find more about it? It looks like a doctored picture, somewhat.

it's not doctored. it may not look photo realistic becuase its a screen grab from video (drone footage) and the trees may look unnatural due to the white dust. I've seen the video and its same flying around for thousands of frames so it would be impossible editing for a conspiracy end user.

The location is, sorry was, Paradise, CA, USA

The claim was forest fire from the media but even fiirefighters went on the record to say no fn way.

BluePowder

jr. member

Activity: 203

Merit: 3

You haven't refuted shit, and you keep pretending this is some conspiracy from me but I'm just loosely explaining other people's work, which is open knowledge and you can verify it using your trusted source. which appears to be nothing but bugs bunny sources.

Even the controlled wikipedia makes some mention of energy weapons, the picture is obviously not proof of anything on its own but its proof of something you can't explain. you can try all you want but no fire or demolition ends up like that.

I got many more, just want to see how phony you are and how far you're willing to put your foot down your throat.

So what's your authoratative source ? For some its the Bible, for some its PHD experts, for some its wisdom of the crowd. you don't seem to have one, your only source seems to be your cousin.

Quote from: Spendulus on May 02, 2020, 10:45:18 AM

Quote from: BluePowder on May 01, 2020, 08:28:59 PM

I missed your comment on the magic fantasy energy weapon, Its called DEW or directed energy or focused energy....

What you did here was reply with a very general and vague reference to the "Star Wars programs."

And zero facts. Got anything more?

Quote from: BluePowder on May 01, 2020, 08:35:58 PM

It's just grade 8 science

TRUST US

Yes, I'm only refuting arguments using grade 8 science. Including your mistaken belief that dust in the air is evidence of some super weapon. Next you'll be referencing some "expert, Phd, Scientist, Engineer" right?

Be my guest. Because then your "expert, Phd, Scientist, Engineer" will be defeated by science at a child's level.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Spendulus on May 02, 2020, 01:28:24 PM

Quote from: BADecker on May 02, 2020, 12:58:36 PM

Quote from: Spendulus on May 02, 2020, 12:16:44 PM

Quote from: BADecker on May 02, 2020, 11:12:58 AM

Quote from: Spendulus on May 02, 2020, 11:10:34 AM

Quote from: sirazimuth on May 01, 2020, 08:50:30 PM

.... load of laughable lunacy...

I merit the creation of a phrase here.

Like 8th graders unanimous? Or 8th graders anonymous? Lol. Cheesy

Children more sensible than 911 truthers.

Okay. Eighth forever, right? Grin

Say how is that space-age magic thermite doing? Found any buildings with it cast into all the concrete lately? I guess building could just go POOF anytime right? What about concrete roads? I'd hate for a road I was on to suddenly vanish.

Thanks, Spendy. It was just my own personal theory. But I'm glad you are trying to prove it for me. Lol.

Cool

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: BADecker on May 02, 2020, 12:58:36 PM

Quote from: Spendulus on May 02, 2020, 12:16:44 PM

Quote from: BADecker on May 02, 2020, 11:12:58 AM

Quote from: Spendulus on May 02, 2020, 11:10:34 AM

Quote from: sirazimuth on May 01, 2020, 08:50:30 PM

.... load of laughable lunacy...

I merit the creation of a phrase here.

Like 8th graders unanimous? Or 8th graders anonymous? Lol. Cheesy

Children more sensible than 911 truthers.

Okay. Eighth forever, right? Grin

Say how is that space-age magic thermite doing? Found any buildings with it cast into all the concrete lately? I guess building could just go POOF anytime right? What about concrete roads? I'd hate for a road I was on to suddenly vanish.

Topic: University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7's Collapse on 9/11 - page 8. (Read 2858 times)