Topic: [UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.1 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative - page 270. (Read 433405 times)

I agree, as someone holding this coin, for the moment, I am concerned about the faster miners. No point in mining this if some can mine 6x faster, this needs to be fixed or it will screw up distribution. I am going to scale out a little tonight and hope somehow a miner gets released, as this coin is very interesting. If the distribution gets too messed up, that won't matter however. This is a serious concern. Short term price and volume isn't an issue, distribution is a major one.

So, news about the miner - one of my testers exaggerated the CPU usage a little, I've run it on several systems and had another tester do it, and while it's increased slightly from stock, it's not really an issue.

The current progress in terms of hashrate is in the screenshot below - that will likely be all, as I just have my testers looking for any bugs I may have added while fixing other bugs before release.

Screenshot (NSFW): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/whirlpoolxwolfpub-03202015.png

I've been having a problem with the mac wallet crashing on me on startup. i just updated the wallet to the new one, but i'm still having the issue. is there anything you can suggest to try? i have 1000 vnl stuck in there.

News 19/03

New wallet is out with the following features/changes:

• Now creates a backup of the original wallet file upon first creation.
• Support for RPC "backupwallet" and "importprivkey".
• Fixed "connect inputs failed" bug related to Proof-of-Stake.
• Fixed balance bug related to Proof-of-Stake.
• Fixed stuck invalid transaction bug related to Proof-of-Stake
• General Bug Fixes

Link: http://vanillacoin.net/wallets.php

See the original post by john-connor: http://vanillacoin.net/forums/viewtopic.php?id=586

Thank you John, this is awesome!

Sorry, i misunderstood then.

That's completely false. The dev wanted to name the project "Libcoin", but he didn't know that there was already a project started with that name.

Quote from John: "No, I named it Libcoin before I knew about libcoin, therefore the core is now called CoinPP. It is a ground up rewrite of PeerCoin and then some."

VNL and Libcoin are the same because libcoin is the first name of the project, it's like saying Dash is a clone of Darkcoin..

No, I say thank You to Honeybadger everywhere. No blaming, just request to add "stop" RPC command that every wallet has and allow to stop it 100% without issues

wownotagain and hippietech you guys make it look like the dumbass bucket sprung a leak

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7KVbTcvjJg

just request to add "stop" RPC command that every wallet has and allow to stop it 100% without issues

    /**
     * Wait for termination.
     */
    boost::asio::io_service ios;
    boost::asio::signal_set signals(ios, SIGINT, SIGTERM);
    signals.async_wait(std::bind(&boost::asio::io_service::stop, &ios));
    ios.run();

Honeybadger fixed it for you, again. And they don't seem to be needing any additional RPC commands. Yeah, there is room for improvements since this is a beta, but your obviously doing something wrong. Your continiously pushing the blame on others.

omg!!!
can you share with us mining soft and config?

This guy thinks I am John, rofl.

You are seriously quoting what I commented 1.5 years ago when I just got to know what crypto is?

Meanwhile for you, the same timespan wasn't enough to educate yourself on how to spot the difference between bitcoin clones and new developments. Please check your comment again that was in response to me. You clearly think that the WhirlpoolX algo is the only thing this project has to offer meaning you:

1) Didn't read the whitepaper
2) Didn't check the code
3) Didn't read the vanillacoin.net forums

Still you are here and ranting about nonsense. Next time pay someone if you are too lazy to do these things for your own research.

And now you are doing personal attacks because someone points out your enormous stupidity? Please read again what you responded to my comment aimed at you and how you kept going on about the algo, like anyone mentioned it in the first place.

Edit: not sure if you missed it during your heavy (and long) research hours, but the developer is "john-connor"

Edit2: everything adds up now, you seriously never visited the official forum, or checked who pushes the github commits, or read the ANN, or anything so far. You have no clue who develops here, what role Wolf0 has or what role I have in this. I guess you never even joined the IRC discussions right? Why are you even talking here, you made less research than what the avarage c-cex trollbox shill does on coins.

VNL is completely a clone of Libcoin.You can check the source code by yourself.

 He locked the thread and allows only 1 core with 1 IP  in order to mine with high performance cpu (or gpu ).

This is definitely a scam without any doubt.

Yes i'm trying to help us not getting burnt. Thats all. When he said new...it is not...I have been mining this algo for a while.


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annwhrl-whirlcoin-whirlpool-algorithm-sloped-rewards-amd-cuda-equal-679134

Of course we did backups and everything is fixed already and deposits/withdrawals and trading works fine. Please, implement "stop" RPC command - it will help to maintain wallet more safely.

I agree, as someone holding this coin, for the moment, I am concerned about the faster miners. No point in mining this if some can mine 6x faster, this needs to be fixed or it will screw up distribution. I am going to scale out a little tonight and hope somehow a miner gets released, as this coin is very interesting. If the distribution gets too messed up, that won't matter however. This is a serious concern. Short term price and volume isn't an issue, distribution is a major one.