[UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.1 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative - page 271.

c-cex

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1001

CryptoCurrency EXchange: https://c-cex.com

Quote from: john-connor on March 18, 2015, 07:48:46 PM

Quote from: hokus_pokus on March 18, 2015, 11:54:03 AM

From IRC: C-cex is working diligently to get wallet working again

12:50:40 PM
they are recompiling now

they had corrupt wallet, john thinks he has identified the reason and he can prevent it from happening again

Yes, I explained to them to maintain backups of their wallet files therefore my decision to have them de-list VNL until they fix their problems. Cool

Thank you for your support.

Of course we did backups and everything is fixed already and deposits/withdrawals and trading works fine. Please, implement "stop" RPC command - it will help to maintain wallet more safely.

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: Wolf0 on March 19, 2015, 04:10:54 AM

Quote from: CryptoClub on March 19, 2015, 12:02:34 AM

Quote from: MemoryShock on March 18, 2015, 10:48:15 PM

Can we please refrain from ad hominems. Granted, trolls going to troll and they have no issue with perpetuating a negative atmosphere but the rest of us don't need to embrace it.

Replies are obviously going to happen but let's keep it civil...it's better in the long run for sure.

Two cents...

I agree, as someone holding this coin, for the moment, I am concerned about the faster miners. No point in mining this if some can mine 6x faster, this needs to be fixed or it will screw up distribution. I am going to scale out a little tonight and hope somehow a miner gets released, as this coin is very interesting. If the distribution gets too messed up, that won't matter however. This is a serious concern. Short term price and volume isn't an issue, distribution is a major one.

FPGA may become a reality if this coin gets big enough - I wrote a nice implementation of Whirlpool that uses no lookup tables at all.

I wrote one too, it worked on the pool but was incredibly slow. Just out of curiosity, how fast was your table-less implementation?

smolen

hero member

Activity: 524

Merit: 500

Quote from: CryptoClub on March 19, 2015, 12:02:34 AM

I am concerned about the faster miners.

It so happened that whirlpool hash function, which is a base for Vanillacoin PoW, is a perfect test subject for bitslicing technique. So sorry, we do some research here, coin fate is mostly irrelevant Wink

CryptoClub

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1000

cryptocollectorsclub.com

Quote from: MemoryShock on March 18, 2015, 10:48:15 PM

Can we please refrain from ad hominems. Granted, trolls going to troll and they have no issue with perpetuating a negative atmosphere but the rest of us don't need to embrace it.

Replies are obviously going to happen but let's keep it civil...it's better in the long run for sure.

Two cents...

I agree, as someone holding this coin, for the moment, I am concerned about the faster miners. No point in mining this if some can mine 6x faster, this needs to be fixed or it will screw up distribution. I am going to scale out a little tonight and hope somehow a miner gets released, as this coin is very interesting. If the distribution gets too messed up, that won't matter however. This is a serious concern. Short term price and volume isn't an issue, distribution is a major one.

MemoryShock

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Can we please refrain from ad hominems. Granted, trolls going to troll and they have no issue with perpetuating a negative atmosphere but the rest of us don't need to embrace it.

Replies are obviously going to happen but let's keep it civil...it's better in the long run for sure.

Two cents...

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: smolen on March 18, 2015, 04:33:22 AM

Quote from: pallas on March 18, 2015, 04:23:27 AM

I made a quick drop-in kernel which does 260 Mh/s on r9 290x@1100/150, no cpu at all.

515MH/s here on 280x@1100/1500 with table-driven algo
EDIT: uint2, copy of table in local memory, table holds 4*256*uint2, no sp_'s wide block trick, no 3bit table preshift
EDIT:
almost 540MH/s with overclocking

Code:

1:12 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Shares:5.49Sh/m Speed: 539.95MH/s 5s: 547.59MH/s
Found something... nCandidates==1
Verify()
Data  :04000000C7F1737F4931F64A911CDD96B02268E1794168C9ABB16AE5217246F2844BF8FA2AB7ED299A064AF40FA3252B1D72C0AF0BB6635F6F60424D15DAA890D50156F2DD5209558DE4041B
Header:04000000C7F1737F4931F64A911CDD96B02268E1794168C9ABB16AE5217246F2844BF8FA2AB7ED299A064AF40FA3252B1D72C0AF0BB6635F6F60424D15DAA890D50156F2DD5209558DE4041B43B7195E
Nonce :5e19b743
Last  :0x0
Hash  :D403C4255B7A31499D9A164051C03C035CB20BF275D777CC83AFEF4200000000
Target:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008DE4040000000000
Share hash above the target
1:13 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Shares:5.73Sh/m Speed: 539.95MH/s 5s: 539.76MH/s

Code:

$ amdconfig --odgc
Default Adapter - AMD Radeon R9 200 Series    
                            Core (MHz)    Memory (MHz)
           Current Clocks :    1150           1500
             Current Peak :    1140           300
  Configurable Peak Range : [300-1500]     [150-2000]
                 GPU load :    99%

Code:

$ amdconfig --odgt

Default Adapter - AMD Radeon R9 200 Series    
                  Sensor 0: Temperature - 81.00 C

Code:

; ----------------- CS Data ------------------------
codeLenInByte        = 16704 bytes;
NumVgprs             = 50;
NumSgprs             = 48;

Not bad. My best is 660MH/s on 290x so far.

CryptoClub

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1000

cryptocollectorsclub.com

Quote from: sly5am on March 18, 2015, 08:53:23 PM

Quote from: wow!NotAgain on March 18, 2015, 05:49:11 PM

small volume nobody want buy

117 Vanillacoin Vanillacoin $ 52,463 $ 0.009135 5,743,112 VNL $ 464 -13.58 %

Fudsters always fud.. go away lewser

Bitcoin is down 10% today, so we are looking at 3.5%, pretty much nothing. I would like to get the new miner though. Until then I will mine something else.

wow!NotAgain

jr. member

Activity: 56

Merit: 10

Quote from: sly5am on March 18, 2015, 08:53:23 PM

Quote from: wow!NotAgain on March 18, 2015, 05:49:11 PM

small volume nobody want buy

117 Vanillacoin Vanillacoin $ 52,463 $ 0.009135 5,743,112 VNL $ 464 -13.58 %

Fudsters always fud.. go away lewser

how is fud? nobody want buy that why no volume

how truth is fud? you must frustrate from holding bag

I sell for profit coin I mine early now it late no profit not having optimize miner you not have? do not given you?

you should mad them

poncho32

sr. member

Activity: 316

Merit: 250

Quote from: sly5am on March 18, 2015, 08:53:23 PM

Quote from: wow!NotAgain on March 18, 2015, 05:49:11 PM

small volume nobody want buy

117 Vanillacoin Vanillacoin $ 52,463 $ 0.009135 5,743,112 VNL $ 464 -13.58 %

Fudsters always fud.. go away lewser

If it goes up another 17 places it will hit the first page of coinmarketcap.com.

sly5am

hero member

Activity: 582

Merit: 500

Quote from: wow!NotAgain on March 18, 2015, 05:49:11 PM

small volume nobody want buy

117 Vanillacoin Vanillacoin $ 52,463 $ 0.009135 5,743,112 VNL $ 464 -13.58 %

Fudsters always fud.. go away lewser

john-connor

sr. member

Activity: 596

Merit: 251

Quote from: hokus_pokus on March 18, 2015, 11:54:03 AM

From IRC: C-cex is working diligently to get wallet working again

12:50:40 PM
they are recompiling now

they had corrupt wallet, john thinks he has identified the reason and he can prevent it from happening again

Yes, I explained to them to maintain backups of their wallet files therefore my decision to have them de-list VNL until they fix their problems. Cool

Thank you for your support.

wow!NotAgain

jr. member

Activity: 56

Merit: 10

small volume nobody want buy

117 Vanillacoin Vanillacoin $ 52,463 $ 0.009135 5,743,112 VNL $ 464 -13.58 %

Jookly

legendary

Activity: 1131

Merit: 1007

wownotagain and hippietech you guys make it look like the dumbass bucket sprung a leak

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7KVbTcvjJg

LovSan

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

(●´ω´●) Nil de nihilo fit

Quote from: wow!NotAgain on March 18, 2015, 02:30:14 PM

Quote from: GlitterRush on March 18, 2015, 01:24:24 PM

i dont know why this coin doesnt have a larger market cap i like large things Roll Eyes

Quote from: wow!NotAgain on March 18, 2015, 02:32:48 PM

Quote from: shaan.is.one on March 18, 2015, 02:27:06 PM

Hmmm wonderful flavour..! As name will be valuable too..

At least FUD properly, not like a past generation broken chat bot.

wow!NotAgain

jr. member

Activity: 56

Merit: 10

Quote from: shaan.is.one on March 18, 2015, 02:27:06 PM

Hmmm wonderful flavour..! As name will be valuable too..

name stupid

name mean nothing

technology is matters most coin have problems technology many from launch

just more pump dump few optimize miners large farm get most coin dumping exchange

wow!NotAgain

jr. member

Activity: 56

Merit: 10

Quote from: GlitterRush on March 18, 2015, 01:24:24 PM

i dont know why this coin doesnt have a larger market cap i like large things Roll Eyes

people not want coin that mined private miner large farm making dumps

many problems wallet coin just made few using optimize mining sell exchange make hype

coin die soon they launch more new algo coin people have optimize miner ready new algo get most coins dump exchange easy btc others end holding bag

coin same others no future

shaan.is.one

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Hmmm wonderful flavour..! As name will be valuable too..

anhpt192

hero member

Activity: 628

Merit: 500

Quote from: Wolf0 on March 18, 2015, 10:55:44 AM

Quote from: smolen on March 18, 2015, 04:33:22 AM

Quote from: pallas on March 18, 2015, 04:23:27 AM

I made a quick drop-in kernel which does 260 Mh/s on r9 290x@1100/150, no cpu at all.

515MH/s here on 280x@1100/1500 with table-driven algo
EDIT: uint2, copy of table in local memory, table holds 4*256*uint2, no sp_'s wide block trick, no 3bit table preshift
EDIT:
almost 540MH/s with overclocking

Code:

1:12 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Shares:5.49Sh/m Speed: 539.95MH/s 5s: 547.59MH/s
Found something... nCandidates==1
Verify()
Data  :04000000C7F1737F4931F64A911CDD96B02268E1794168C9ABB16AE5217246F2844BF8FA2AB7ED299A064AF40FA3252B1D72C0AF0BB6635F6F60424D15DAA890D50156F2DD5209558DE4041B
Header:04000000C7F1737F4931F64A911CDD96B02268E1794168C9ABB16AE5217246F2844BF8FA2AB7ED299A064AF40FA3252B1D72C0AF0BB6635F6F60424D15DAA890D50156F2DD5209558DE4041B43B7195E
Nonce :5e19b743
Last  :0x0
Hash  :D403C4255B7A31499D9A164051C03C035CB20BF275D777CC83AFEF4200000000
Target:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008DE4040000000000
Share hash above the target
1:13 A:0 R:0 HW:0 Shares:5.73Sh/m Speed: 539.95MH/s 5s: 539.76MH/s

Code:

$ amdconfig --odgc
Default Adapter - AMD Radeon R9 200 Series    
                            Core (MHz)    Memory (MHz)
           Current Clocks :    1150           1500
             Current Peak :    1140           300
  Configurable Peak Range : [300-1500]     [150-2000]
                 GPU load :    99%

Code:

$ amdconfig --odgt

Default Adapter - AMD Radeon R9 200 Series    
                  Sensor 0: Temperature - 81.00 C

Code:

; ----------------- CS Data ------------------------
codeLenInByte        = 16704 bytes;
NumVgprs             = 50;
NumSgprs             = 48;

Not bad. My best is 660MH/s on 290x so far.

omg!!!
can you share with us mining soft and config?

GlitterRush

jr. member

Activity: 56

Merit: 10

i dont know why this coin doesnt have a larger market cap i like large things Roll Eyes

traumschiff

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1001

180 BPM

We are being added to whattomine: http://www.whattomine.com/coins/130-vnl-whirlpoolx

Can some of the miners check if the numbers are okay? Thank you.

Topic: [UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.1 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative - page 271. (Read 433405 times)