[UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.1 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative - page 54.

HCLivess

legendary

Activity: 2114

Merit: 1090

=== NODE IS OK! ==

Mister Connor. There is an issue in Windows - if you click to unlock twice, enter password and then on the other popup screen (it pops up twice) you press cancel, the client freezes

etoque

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1000

Quote from: I am the guy on November 01, 2015, 10:18:11 PM

Is there is any information about GPU hashrates and expected VNL mining rewards?

got between 8-15 vnl day with an saphire 270x,its relative to difficulty

I am the guy

full member

Activity: 237

Merit: 100

Is there is any information about GPU hashrates and expected VNL mining rewards?

YAdaminer

hero member

Activity: 829

Merit: 1000

Quote from: jimlite on November 01, 2015, 10:13:30 AM

Quote from: YAdaminer on November 01, 2015, 08:21:04 AM

Quote from: jimlite on October 31, 2015, 11:36:50 PM

Question: If I have a super peer with 10k coins and have another 8k coins, can I have another wallet that just stakes and is not a super peer on the same IP/home network as the super peer and not have a rewards penalty?

Jimlite, I think this explains that situaution.
https://talk.vanillacoin.net/topic/249/node-incentive-help

I did not really fully understand that thread. I just seem to get less rewards on my super peer than avg by far, and was wondering if it was because I also am running a regular staking wallet on the same network/IP?

Yes, it's hard to find out what is causing what problem because super peer rewards are based on luck rewarding system and it's hard to recognize does something is caused by bad luck or is it some real problem, error, ... That's why I was talking from the start that pool based (equal to all for each block) reward system would be better. Anyway that is still my oppinion. Last few days number of super peers went down from almost 200 to something more than 150 so we should get more rewards but rewards are inconsistent and talks about averaging is nonsense for those with only 1 superpeer. My home PC superpeer got only 1 reward in 2 days and it seems as worst place for superpeer, 2 VPS got none in 24 hours while one got 4 rewards, so yes averaging works but...

jimlite

legendary

Activity: 1848

Merit: 1018

Quote from: YAdaminer on November 01, 2015, 08:21:04 AM

Quote from: jimlite on October 31, 2015, 11:36:50 PM

Question: If I have a super peer with 10k coins and have another 8k coins, can I have another wallet that just stakes and is not a super peer on the same IP/home network as the super peer and not have a rewards penalty?

Jimlite, I think this explains that situaution.
https://talk.vanillacoin.net/topic/249/node-incentive-help

I did not really fully understand that thread. I just seem to get less rewards on my super peer than avg by far, and was wondering if it was because I also am running a regular staking wallet on the same network/IP?

groggin

legendary

Activity: 1894

Merit: 1001

Quote from: YAdaminer on November 01, 2015, 08:21:04 AM

Quote from: jimlite on October 31, 2015, 11:36:50 PM

Question: If I have a super peer with 10k coins and have another 8k coins, can I have another wallet that just stakes and is not a super peer on the same IP/home network as the super peer and not have a rewards penalty?

Jimlite, I think this explains that situaution.
https://talk.vanillacoin.net/topic/249/node-incentive-help

i'm doing that - 1 wallet w/10k, another in another user account w/less, both are running, i'm getting stake and rewards, but i can't answer your question Tongue

YAdaminer

hero member

Activity: 829

Merit: 1000

Quote from: jimlite on October 31, 2015, 11:36:50 PM

Question: If I have a super peer with 10k coins and have another 8k coins, can I have another wallet that just stakes and is not a super peer on the same IP/home network as the super peer and not have a rewards penalty?

Jimlite, I think this explains that situaution.
https://talk.vanillacoin.net/topic/249/node-incentive-help

jimlite

legendary

Activity: 1848

Merit: 1018

Question: If I have a super peer with 10k coins and have another 8k coins, can I have another wallet that just stakes and is not a super peer on the same IP/home network as the super peer and not have a rewards penalty?

john-connor

sr. member

Activity: 596

Merit: 251

Quote from: bigfryguy on October 31, 2015, 12:16:22 PM

Is there a way to tell which address sent you coins from the client?
Or to be able to tell which address coins were sent to?

I would like to be able to use cryptopia to retail a few items, but I dont want to use the the blockchain explorer to figure out who sent which coins.

Please use the official forums for these types of technical questions. Cool

Thank you for your support.

john-connor

sr. member

Activity: 596

Merit: 251

Quote from: bitcoin carpenter on October 31, 2015, 11:27:27 AM

He already promised it would be in this quarter.

Yes, I did. Some projects are already in QA. They will all be Ninja launched when we are satisfied with the results. Cool

Thank you for your support.

john-connor

sr. member

Activity: 596

Merit: 251

Quote from: etoque on October 31, 2015, 12:06:09 PM

originally Dark++ was suppose to came for Q4...

Q4 isn't over, not even close. Cool

Thank you for your support.

bigfryguy

sr. member

Activity: 416

Merit: 250

Is there a way to tell which address sent you coins from the client?
Or to be able to tell which address coins were sent to?

I would like to be able to use cryptopia to retail a few items, but I dont want to use the the blockchain explorer to figure out who sent which coins.

etoque

legendary

Activity: 1988

Merit: 1000

Quote from: pseudonymdude on October 31, 2015, 11:32:33 AM

Quote from: dygus on October 31, 2015, 08:54:55 AM

Quote from: john-connor on October 31, 2015, 02:58:22 AM

Quote from: traumschiff on October 31, 2015, 02:49:25 AM

Nice to get some info on the mixer Wink

I just meant CoinJoin wasn't so far used well, the basic implementation which people used lacked always something.

Yes, the example here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CoinJoin is flawed and like most implementations you can match inputs and outputs because the denominations differ. Cool

Quote from: traumschiff on October 31, 2015, 02:49:25 AM

Any rough ETA you may want to give on the DarkPP release?

Dark++ is a framework, so it will come in stages.

Thank you for your support.

Ok, so when you can give us the nearest stage?

One dark application will come within the next 3 months approximately.

See the 4-month timeline announced 3 weeks ago: https://talk.vanillacoin.net/topic/221/4-month-timeline

originally Dark++ was suppose to came for Q4...

pseudonymdude

legendary

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

Quote from: dygus on October 31, 2015, 08:54:55 AM

Quote from: john-connor on October 31, 2015, 02:58:22 AM

Quote from: traumschiff on October 31, 2015, 02:49:25 AM

Nice to get some info on the mixer Wink

I just meant CoinJoin wasn't so far used well, the basic implementation which people used lacked always something.

Yes, the example here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CoinJoin is flawed and like most implementations you can match inputs and outputs because the denominations differ. Cool

Quote from: traumschiff on October 31, 2015, 02:49:25 AM

Any rough ETA you may want to give on the DarkPP release?

Dark++ is a framework, so it will come in stages.

Thank you for your support.

Ok, so when you can give us the nearest stage?

One dark application will come within the next 3 months approximately.

See the 4-month timeline announced 3 weeks ago: https://talk.vanillacoin.net/topic/221/4-month-timeline

bitcoin carpenter

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1001

He already promised it would be in this quarter.

dygus

legendary

Activity: 1193

Merit: 1000

Peaky Blinder

Quote from: john-connor on October 31, 2015, 02:58:22 AM

Quote from: traumschiff on October 31, 2015, 02:49:25 AM

Nice to get some info on the mixer Wink

I just meant CoinJoin wasn't so far used well, the basic implementation which people used lacked always something.

Yes, the example here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CoinJoin is flawed and like most implementations you can match inputs and outputs because the denominations differ. Cool

Quote from: traumschiff on October 31, 2015, 02:49:25 AM

Any rough ETA you may want to give on the DarkPP release?

Dark++ is a framework, so it will come in stages.

Thank you for your support.

Ok, so when you can give us the nearest stage?

john-connor

sr. member

Activity: 596

Merit: 251

Quote from: traumschiff on October 31, 2015, 02:49:25 AM

Nice to get some info on the mixer Wink

I just meant CoinJoin wasn't so far used well, the basic implementation which people used lacked always something.

Yes, the example here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CoinJoin is flawed and like most implementations you can match inputs and outputs because the denominations differ. Cool

Quote from: traumschiff on October 31, 2015, 02:49:25 AM

Any rough ETA you may want to give on the DarkPP release?

Dark++ is a framework, so it will come in stages.

Thank you for your support.

traumschiff

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1001

180 BPM

Quote from: john-connor on October 31, 2015, 12:41:25 AM

Quote from: traumschiff on October 30, 2015, 12:14:57 PM

Quote from: etoque on October 30, 2015, 12:06:32 PM

can we simply have more information about darkpp please ? how it suppose to work? Its an mixer ? side chain ?

It's a mixer most probably (according to some of the file names and code bits on github) and will probably bring a certain level of anonimity to transactions if I had to make a guess. I doubt it's going to be CoinJoin or something equal basic though.

BTW if you would open a topic on talk.vanillacoin.com about the DarkPP questions I'm sure you will get a faster response from John. You asked here 3x already in 2 pages with no luck.

There is nothing wrong with CoinJoin, it is 100% anonymous when denominations are identical.

Let me show you:

Code:


array unblended_txs = { transaction("A", "B", 25), transaction("B", "C", 25), transaction("C", "A", 25) };

for (auto & i : unblended_txs)
{
    for (auto & j : i.outs())
    {
        tx_blended.outs().push_back(j);
    }

    for (auto & j : i.ins())
    {
        tx_blended.ins().push_back(j);
    }
}

random_device rd;
mt19937 g(rd());

random_shuffle(tx_blended.ins().begin(), tx_blended.ins().end(), g);
random_shuffle(tx_blended.outs().begin(), tx_blended.outs().end(), g)

transaction tx_final = tx_blended;

In the blockchain you would not be able to tell which input belongs to which output.

It would go from:

Code:

Transaction:
A 25 => B 25
B 25 => C 25
C 25 => A 25

to:

Code:

Transaction:
B 25 => C 25
C 25 => B 25
A 25 => A 25

...with no way to put them back into original order you cannot tell who sent who which one.

Thank you for your support.

Nice to get some info on the mixer Wink

I just meant CoinJoin wasn't so far used well, the basic implementation which people used lacked always something.

Any rough ETA you may want to give on the DarkPP release?

d0om

full member

Activity: 171

Merit: 100

Quote from: EmilioMann on October 30, 2015, 07:03:19 AM

seems that the current pump on btc is going for a ponzi scheme promoted on poor countries by a famous russian scammer.
believe it or not

http://cointelegraph.com/news/115425/btcc-ceo-bobby-lee-warns-bitcoin-investors-about-mmm-ponzi-scheme

https://letstalkbitcoin.com/blog/post/mmm-global-republic-of-bitcoin-cryptos-next-scandal

http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-price-breaks-260-to-hit-two-month-high/

http://beta.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/russian-fraudster-hits-s-africans-1911289

last night this ponzi scheme came to china and the price difference between huobi and bitfinex reached $30

That's hilarious. The Russian prince travels to Nigeria Wink

john-connor

sr. member

Activity: 596

Merit: 251

Quote from: traumschiff on October 30, 2015, 12:14:57 PM

Quote from: etoque on October 30, 2015, 12:06:32 PM

can we simply have more information about darkpp please ? how it suppose to work? Its an mixer ? side chain ?

It's a mixer most probably (according to some of the file names and code bits on github) and will probably bring a certain level of anonimity to transactions if I had to make a guess. I doubt it's going to be CoinJoin or something equal basic though.

BTW if you would open a topic on talk.vanillacoin.com about the DarkPP questions I'm sure you will get a faster response from John. You asked here 3x already in 2 pages with no luck.

There is nothing wrong with CoinJoin, it is 100% anonymous when denominations are identical.

Let me show you:

Code:


array unblended_txs = { transaction("A", "B", 25), transaction("B", "C", 25), transaction("C", "A", 25) };

for (auto & i : unblended_txs)
{
    for (auto & j : i.outs())
    {
        tx_blended.outs().push_back(j);
    }

    for (auto & j : i.ins())
    {
        tx_blended.ins().push_back(j);
    }
}

random_device rd;
mt19937 g(rd());

random_shuffle(tx_blended.ins().begin(), tx_blended.ins().end(), g);
random_shuffle(tx_blended.outs().begin(), tx_blended.outs().end(), g)

transaction tx_final = tx_blended;

In the blockchain you would not be able to tell which input belongs to which output.

It would go from:

Code:

Transaction:
A 25 => B 25
B 25 => C 25
C 25 => A 25

to:

Code:

Transaction:
B 25 => C 25
C 25 => B 25
A 25 => A 25

...with no way to put them back into original order you cannot tell who sent who which one.

Thank you for your support.

Topic: [UNOFFICIAL] [VNL] Vanillacoin 0.4.1 | Instant ▱ Incentivized ▱ Innovative - page 54. (Read 433438 times)