Topic: Up Like Trump - page 195. (Read 572791 times)

Trump is just rich shit! 

truth story bro...

I didn't bother with the vid which, considering the nature of the poster, is probably a waste of time.  To the descriptive text, however:

I've been thinking about the illegal immigration thing a bit lately.  Both how I used to think about the issue in the past and how my feelings on it have taken a roller coaster ride, and what I think makes sense today.  Here, for critique, are my thoughts.

I would 'get them up against the wall' and lined up for the 'big beautiful door' that Trump talks about.  I would have a large quota because there are plenty if illegals who are great for our country.  Re-entrance would be on a points system.

 - Leave involuntarily -> not applicable for re-entrance.

 - Entered illegally and got into trouble with crime -> very negative points.

 - Entered illegally and took benefits -> negative points

 - Entered illegally and paid taxes, had no legal problems, and took no benefits -> positive points

An off-hand guess would be that we could set the quota at such a point where every illegal who is a benefit to our country could come right back in.  If not on a path to naturalization then at the very least on a work visa.

(For the dopes among us, I don't necessarily mean 'wall', 'door', 'leave', 'enter', etc in a literal sense.)

This is amazing

Donald Trump  - Get Then Up Against The Wall
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fR0pPZVClgc

Yes, I disagree with everything Trump says, because he lies way more than Hillary (if that is even possible)
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/
77% of Trumps statements have been rated Mostly-False, False, or Pants-on-Fire Lies! (Hillary only has 28% in these 3 ratings)



http://newsexaminer.net/politics/donald-trump-the-least-charitable-billionaire/

Printing?  Someone still prints books on paper?

Man, that is news to me.

The rest of your stuff reads like made up in a hurry propaganda.

Look, Trump says he has donated a hundred million to charitable causes.  Do you disagree?  Just asking.   

I think King is a very talented writer, over in a very interesting mental space detached from reality.

Getting ready... Sea bass filets in my indoor grill,

A bit of olive oil, garlic, vinegar, salt, and parsley for the fish.

Tomato salad.

Soy sauce for the quinoa.

A nice glass of Cabernet Sauvignon. A red wine that goes well with everything, meat or fish.


Thank you very much!

 

I'm fairly sure thousands of people are employed printing Stephen King books... How many jobs have you created? (STFU idiot)

Stephen King is also a PHILANTHROPIST... something the Don can't even spell!

Trump only hires Polish illegal non-immigrants...

I don't know why he hires Polish illegal immigrants then exports the illegal Mexican ones... some people would call that being a hypocrite... some people...

I AM A YUUUUGE FAN OF STEPHEN KING. Of course he cannot like TRUMP. That's not in his DNA. I respect the artist though. He is who he is.

You can post as many Stephen king memes as you like here. Keep my thread up, while I am eating.

Thank you.

 

Funniest thing.  I always thought the ENTERTAINER was Stephen King.

You know, the writer about scarey stuff?

The guy that never created any jobs?

Yes, that guy.

You can watch the 'beheading' vid in safety.  'ISIS' was kind and gentle and didn't show the actual act.  They didn't want to have to clean up any blood off the green-screen I suppose.  Then watch the interview with Foley's 'siblings'.  I certainly hope that my sister can avoid giggling if she is interviewed a few days after I am beheaded.  I hope my pictures don't jump off the wall either.  A critical element of these hoaxes is to make it so obvious that other media knows to stay away from it.  They jumped the shark with Foley.

I'd rate Trump as a 9 (because I almost never give a 10.)  Politicians are professional con artists and he leaves even the best of them who have made it to the highest office in probably the world in the dust.

In order to be good at developing confidence in an audience, it helps a lot for there to be some actual real-world basis for confidence.  As best I can tell, there is a decent amount of evidence that this is the case with Trump.  Of course with the package we get a large dose of showmanship.  I'm cool with that in part because it is what it takes to win these days and in part because it is kind of fun.

"Trump, Supporters Undeterred by Protests"


Rest here: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/03/13/trump_supporters_undeterred_by_protests_129958.html

----------

It looks like the protester count has faced back to the baseline of about a dozen or so per rally.

I stand corrected: con-artist. Not scam artist.
First time I learn about the Foley beheading being a hoax.

On a con-artist scale from 1 to 10, where do you place TRUMP? 11 can be an answer too.

That is not true.  To the extent that I 'believe' anything, I believe that Trump is a con-artist.  That is to say, he has taken the art of building confidence to a high level.  That says nothing about whether the confidence is deserved.  I am as hopeful about Trump as I have been about any candidate who has a realistic chance of winning.  Of course that is a fairly low bar to clear at this point in time.

I will say that Trump did himself no favors with me when he brought of the Foley beheading thing.  That was one of the most absurd and obvious hoaxes ever.  If he actually got conned on that one I have some serious questions about his capabilities.  If he did not, then it speaks genuine scam artist to me.  I call 'em like I see 'em.  Always have.

 

I covered as much as I could about this character and the attack on TRUMP from here and forward:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14179012

I love everything about the bitcointalk community and I am as paranoid as the next guy/gal. It is a good thing you do your own research and share what you believe is true reality (in your case, TRUMP being a scam artist).

He was defending free speech and the process put in place. Not even defending or supporting TRUMP...

I see time and time again in the headlines of news stories that Trump was 'shaken' by the recent attack at his rally.  When I look at it, I really don't see much sign of him looking all that 'shaken' per se.  If I were in his situation I would be scared as hell all of the time and the event with the secret service surrounding me and such would have caused me to produce a yellow puddle.  It seems to me that Trump handled things quite well with an appropriate come-back when he got going again (thanking the people in front for the warning and getting back to his spiel more or less on context.)

Am I wearing rose colored glasses?  Second opinion?

I might add that whenever such a thing as this happens I look for signs that it was a staged setup.  I don't think it probably was in this case for a few reasons.  It doesn't look to me like Trump played it up as well as he could have if it were staged, and it seems that he changed from fairly legitimate surprise at the event were it occurred to what looks like genuine anger and the next event (though he is an actor of sorts so he could easily fool me with whatever emotion he chose to display I suspect.)  Secondly, the attacker does legitimately seem to have a history (whether or not the ISIS stuff was a sham) and if he were developing it over the course of time, blowing his cover for this little stunt doesn't seem like it would be worthwhile.  Though in fairness, it also doesn't blow the development of a baclground I suppose.