Author

Topic: Up Like Trump - page 244. (Read 572786 times)

legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1251
February 02, 2016, 03:44:23 AM
Bli8nd Americans! You want a king so badly, that you are willing to give up your freedom for someone who will take your freedom away more than ever. Dump Trump before it is too late for you.

Smiley

Well... I more or less agree with you but difficult to judge from our position... Don't know where you're from but most countries have shitty government with more or less kings leader not giving  a fuck about people...
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
February 02, 2016, 03:26:28 AM
Bli8nd Americans! You want a king so badly, that you are willing to give up your freedom for someone who will take your freedom away more than ever. Dump Trump before it is too late for you.

Smiley
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
February 01, 2016, 10:52:55 PM
he will be elected as the new president of US.....that would be great news for the americans:)
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
February 01, 2016, 06:02:51 PM
I wanted to share some old news with you all: http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/08/investing/donald-trump-make-america-great-again-trademark/

The Don applied to trademark "Make America Great Again" just days after Obama won the 2012 elections!
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
February 01, 2016, 05:52:06 PM
Donald Trump's moment of truth has come in Iowa - CNNPolitics.com
CNN‎ - 12 mins ago
Tonight's Iowa caucuses offer the first real test of Donald Trump's ability to transform the ...

Donald Trump is a fraud: Report confirms the billionaire's presidential bid is a long and calculated con job
Salon‎ - 4 hours ago

White House rejects Donald Trump's offer to build $100 million ballroom
USA TODAY‎ - 3 hours ago



hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 722
February 01, 2016, 05:30:49 PM
I hope Trump wins the republican nomination... ... ... so he can feel the Bern!


Definitely scared of a Trump president... first thing he'll do is declare war on Mexicans and Muslims... WW3 here we come!
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
February 01, 2016, 01:22:37 PM



IOWA GOP: THOUSANDS of Democrats, Independents CHANGED PARTY to Vote in GOP Caucus









legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
February 01, 2016, 11:35:03 AM
From my perspective (as a non-US citizen) old Donald Trump is the embodiment of the "American Dream".
I wouldn't be at all surprised if he did end up taking the presidential election, He may very well have the white southern US vote.

Not entirely up to date on who the candidates are. But between Trump and the she-Clinton I'm not sure the country stands a chance.


Not just them...

 Smiley







http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2016/01/herman_cain_the_trump_phenomenon_is_winning_over_black_women.html


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAFj3ZiPJZk


http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/13/why-black-voters-should-pick-trump-not-hillary/






Rationally, black voters should definitely choose Trump over Hillary.  In practice, a lot vote a straight Dem ticket.

Hillary doesn't give a rat's ass about them.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
February 01, 2016, 08:08:35 AM
From my perspective (as a non-US citizen) old Donald Trump is the embodiment of the "American Dream".
I wouldn't be at all surprised if he did end up taking the presidential election, He may very well have the white southern US vote.

Not entirely up to date on who the candidates are. But between Trump and the she-Clinton I'm not sure the country stands a chance.


Not just them...

 Smiley







http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2016/01/herman_cain_the_trump_phenomenon_is_winning_over_black_women.html


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAFj3ZiPJZk


http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/13/why-black-voters-should-pick-trump-not-hillary/




newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
February 01, 2016, 07:53:32 AM
From my perspective (as a non-US citizen) old Donald Trump is the embodiment of the "American Dream".
I wouldn't be at all surprised if he did end up taking the presidential election, He may very well have the white southern US vote.

Not entirely up to date on who the candidates are. But between Trump and the she-Clinton I'm not sure the country stands a chance.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
February 01, 2016, 07:49:42 AM





legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
January 30, 2016, 08:34:37 AM
Seems like that's just the way it is.  But the primaries are going to him fast and hard.

Right now Trump is well ahead of the others in the opinion polls, but there is no guarantee that he will be able to win the primaries. The Republican primaries are very complex. Some of the states follow the "Winner-take-all" system, while the others follow the Proportional system. Winning the states having the "Winner-take-all" system will be easy for Trump.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 30, 2016, 08:18:57 AM



[...]

Many of those same overpaid, underperforming tax-exempt sinecure-holders are now demanding that Trump be stopped. Why? Because, as his critics have noted in a rising chorus of hysteria, Trump represents “an existential threat to conservatism.”

Let that sink in. Conservative voters are being scolded for supporting a candidate they consider conservative because it would be bad for conservatism? And by the way, the people doing the scolding? They’re the ones who’ve been advocating for open borders, and nation-building in countries whose populations hate us, and trade deals that eliminated jobs while enriching their donors, all while implicitly mocking the base for its worries about abortion and gay marriage and the pace of demographic change. Now they’re telling their voters to shut up and obey, and if they don’t, they’re liberal.

It turns out the GOP wasn’t simply out of touch with its voters; the party had no idea who its voters were or what they believed. For decades, party leaders and intellectuals imagined that most Republicans were broadly libertarian on economics and basically neoconservative on foreign policy. That may sound absurd now, after Trump has attacked nearly the entire Republican catechism (he savaged the Iraq War and hedge fund managers in the same debate) and been greatly rewarded for it, but that was the assumption the GOP brain trust operated under. They had no way of knowing otherwise. The only Republicans they talked to read the Wall Street Journal too.

[...]

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/donald-trump-is-shocking-vulgar-and-right-213572?paginate=false


legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 30, 2016, 07:53:19 AM



Monumentally Stupid Anti-Trump Video Debunked





 Cheesy Smiley Cheesy

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 30, 2016, 07:45:35 AM
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
January 29, 2016, 10:40:46 PM
very nice speech
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
January 29, 2016, 09:37:36 PM
As someone who does not watch cable, satellite or broadcast TV, I do not watch Fox News.  However, I've managed one way or another to watch the fox debates.  Also, my new car has Sirius, so I have been listening to Fox News and FN Business on and off on the radio (eg, voice track of the TV show).  For about 10 weeks.  Here's what I've concluded.

All the Fox News guys and girls talk like they'd like to get Trump out of the running.  All of them.  Period.

Seems like that's just the way it is.  But the primaries are going to him fast and hard.

Let's just see what happens.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
January 29, 2016, 09:14:46 PM
The more garbage media bashes Trump the more popular he gets. Very promising. America will be so much better off when nobody at all whatsoever in the land takes garbage media seriously.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
January 29, 2016, 07:20:32 PM



First Read: Why Donald Trump Won the Debate Without Showing Up - NBC News


 DES MOINES, IA -- Earlier this week, we wrote that Donald Trump's decision not to attend Thursday's GOP debate could be a brilliant tactical move -- or a disastrous one. Well, after watching the two hours of debate last night, it was clearly the former. Why? We can count three reasons:

His closest competition had a bad night: The man who's his closest competition in Iowa, Ted Cruz, had maybe his worst debate performance of the cycle. And a lot of it was due to the fact that he -- not Trump -- was the candidate with the target on his back. Marco Rubio went after Cruz, hard. So did Rand Paul. But it was Cruz who also did himself no favors by trying to win an interruption contest with co-moderator Chris Wallace (and lost) and who attacked the moderators' questions like he did at the CNBC debate (but was booed in the process). Cruz got his taste of being the frontrunner, and he struggled. The Des Moines Register's front page sums it up: "Rough Night for Cruz."

He got to skip Fox's brutal video montage: Trump also won by not showing up because he avoided getting the same kind of brutal video montage that Fox News showed first on Rubio (with his past statements vowing to fight amnesty and an earned path to legalization -- before backing the Gang of Eight immigration bill), and then on Cruz (on supporting immigration reform and a path to legal status). It was evidence to Iowa conservatives that NO ONE is going to get to Trump's right on the issue of immigration.

And he got to sit on his lead in Iowa with three days to go: Given it all, Trump got to protect his lead in Iowa and in the other early contests. Now it's still possible that Trump could lose Iowa - due to turnout -- but it won't be because of last night's debate. When you think about it, what we all thought was Trump's gamble turned into the safest move for someone with the lead.

http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/first-read-why-donald-trump-won-debate-without-showing-n506786


Jump to: