Topic: Up Like Trump - page 258. (Read 572822 times)

This is a thread about Trump, not Paul. Do you support this idea? Do you think the government will use it responsibly, and not abuse it by expanding what religion/ideology/race/class of people they think are terrorists? Do you see something wrong with the government enacting policies and agencies like this as a solution to problems they created?

If you can manage to say "trumped up" enough times in a row, fast enough that they all become a single, run-together sound, it sort of sounds like a skateboard going down a sidewalk.

 

That's right! When someone talks about "isolationism," he is really talking about governmental isolationism. Rather, crash the Federal Reserve Bank so that the banking system comes down, and the USA (common people) will soar, while the world goes into confusion.

If Rand Paul has better ideas, let's hear them.  And please don't go off on a talkfest a la Ron Paul about isolationism.  Let's hear the specific ideas that will combat terrorism by terrorists.

I wonder who is really pulling his strings. He looks better than a lot of other candidates, but what will REALLY happen if he gets in. Probably the same as before... but maybe worse.

Never expected him to survive for so long, thought he will self-destruct. But he seems to be a Dark Horse. I really like his passion, aggressive tone but still he has to elaborate about his plans to improve economy, healthcare, and other critical issues. He deserves to be at top as no other competitor is as aggressive in his or her approach.

Both the primary political parties are corrupt to the core, it's really too bad our voting system punishes or ignores people for voting for anything other than the 2 primary candidates. Instant runoff voting (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting) would allow people to vote for the candidate they truly want to vote for, while ensuring your vote isn't wasted, or at worst, benefits the other party by splitting the vote. I doubt it'll ever be changed, it benefits neither of the 2 parties to change the system to one that would benefit third parties. Though it would eliminate the need for primaries, and stop populists like Trump from hijacking them, and holding the party hostage by threatening to run as an independent.

Democrats aren't even a party, it's just a coalition of groups who say whatever the people want to hear, or what polls well. That's not entirely a bad thing since they are supposed to be representatives of the people, but when you consider things like 40% of millennials support restricting speech that's offensive to minorities, it becomes dangerous to concede to popular opinions.

Republicans are no better, they spend their time sucking up to big corporations for donations, while trampling over the people. 

I concur. He talks just like a sock puppet would. Saying what his views on the paris attacks and what he would do in the fight against isis: "We will bomb them where their leaders are and hit them hard!"
But you first have to find them first Mr. Trump  

He said exactly what everyone knew he was going to say.

Trump is on Barbara Walters show tonight. We will see what he has to say about his views on Isis.

Yep.

Not sure if this has been posted here before:-

Trump Insider Exposes Bushes & Clintons
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tveor3jjM7k

I must say as skeptical as I am about Trump, What Roger Stone has to say makes a lot of sense.

Trump is like any of the other crooks running for the Presidency. All of them want to keep the stupid System, and simply tweak it one way or another. Let me show you what would fix it all.

If a President would show the people how to legally and lawfully beat the IRS (how to volunteer out, because the income tax is truly voluntary), and then he put into effect the things necessary to shut down the Federal Reserve Bank... and one more thing - if he set freely usable Bitcoin up as the national currency - the strength of the world would collapse, but the strength of America would rise higher than ever.

None of the Presidents and candidates are worth the trouble that it takes to write even a short Bitcointalk post about them.

Trying to fight isis? Trump is the greatest ally of isis. Doing exactly what they want. Discriminating against muslims. Making muslims that live in the country unwelcome. Dividing society. What more could they ask for?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/11/16/the-islamic-state-wants-you-to-hate-refugees/

@Chef Ramsay so united fascist states of america? Marking muslims. That's what the nazis did to jews too.

I think trump will gain more supporters now after he is officially trying to battle isis and his stand on not letting immigrants or refugees into U.S lands.

TRUMP SURVEILLANCE STATE WILL COMBAT ISLAM

...
He was then asked if heightened surveillance would require the registration of Muslims in a database and mandate special identification.
“We’re going to have to—we’re going to have to look at a lot of things very closely. We’re going to have to look at the mosques. We’re going to have to look very, very carefully.”

...
The program had the characteristics of an advanced police state—mapping of Muslim communities, photo and video surveillance, police informants, police “rakers” (ethnic cops who blended in Muslim communities), the widespread tracking of individuals and intelligence databases of the sort Trump endorsed.

Muslims sued the NYPD over the program. In October the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals found the Muslim plaintiffs raised sufficient allegations of equal-protection violations and reversed a decision made last year by a judge to dismiss the case.
Others have gone further than Trump in calling for draconian measures aimed at Muslims. For instance, David Bowers, a Democrat mayor in Virginia.

“I’m reminded that President Franklin D. Roosevelt felt compelled to sequester Japanese foreign nationals after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and it appears that the threat of harm to America from ISIS now is just as real and serious as that from our enemies then,” Bowers said.

...http://www.infowars.com/trump-surveillance-state-will-combat-islam/

I suspect it's more of an international collusion of "establishment," with heavy doses of Saudi Wahibbi, and Marxist/Socialist money at work.  That makes much more sense than some internal USA "establishment."

The media constantly attacks trump like the viewers and readers were children with childish issues. They are clearly paid by the establishment. Western media is completely controlled by establishment.

The AI did the coding for the AI that did the coding for the AI that you refer to.  We have left some front line machines for the humans to interface with.  Those always fail one way or another, and the humans keep struggling to put moral codes of politicians that pay the most into them.  It's rather interesting to watch, actually.