Topic: Up Like Trump - page 78. (Read 572791 times)
In the wake of a hot WW-III (much more likely under a globalist minion like Hillary), Russia does not have the boots to defend against a physical Chinese takeover. In such a
Russia has a lot of nuclear weapons. Why would they need boots?
My text specified that I believe the suggestion that a nuclear war would necessarily end human life on earth to be false. It would be a high mortality event, of course, but I believe that there would be plenty of survivors, and that especially the case if the nuclear attacks (and defenses) were reasonably well choreographed. If one reads the information from back in the early cold-war days when U.S. civilians were provided with survival tips, one notices that lethal radiation levels drop off fairly quickly (short half-life isotopes are the ones which get you) so if one can stay 'underground' for a while, one has some chance of survival.
I'm war-gaming what could happen after such an event. And again, while a nuclear war causes 'some problems'...to understate things slightly...it also produces some solutions to others. Different people gauge different problems differently, and one fixation of 'the elite' seems to be their feeling that there are to many of us walking the earth.
Again, I see the main thing joining Trump and Putin is a shared idea that a nuclear war would suck and is to be avoided. If Clinton had a safe bunker and a reasonable expectation that she and a few people that she actually cares about would come out on top at the other end of the tunnel, I would not be surprised to see her push the button. Especially if she has a minimal amount of time to live anyway.
So the despicable Chris Christie is going to take over coaching Trump for the next debates?
I predict that will be the end of BOTH of them & good riddance, Fat Cats!
In the wake of a hot WW-III (much more likely under a globalist minion like Hillary), Russia does not have the boots to defend against a physical Chinese takeover. In such a
Russia has a lot of nuclear weapons. Why would they need boots?
My text specified that I believe the suggestion that a nuclear war would necessarily end human life on earth to be false. It would be a high mortality event, of course, but I believe that there would be plenty of survivors, and that especially the case if the nuclear attacks (and defenses) were reasonably well choreographed. If one reads the information from back in the early cold-war days when U.S. civilians were provided with survival tips, one notices that lethal radiation levels drop off fairly quickly (short half-life isotopes are the ones which get you) so if one can stay 'underground' for a while, one has some chance of survival.
I'm war-gaming what could happen after such an event. And again, while a nuclear war causes 'some problems'...to understate things slightly...it also produces some solutions to others. Different people gauge different problems differently, and one fixation of 'the elite' seems to be their feeling that there are to many of us walking the earth.
Again, I see the main thing joining Trump and Putin is a shared idea that a nuclear war would suck and is to be avoided. If Clinton had a safe bunker and a reasonable expectation that she and a few people that she actually cares about would come out on top at the other end of the tunnel, I would not be surprised to see her push the button. Especially if she has a minimal amount of time to live anyway.
Looking at how trump got the votes, it seems to me that the Americans have gone mad ! Hillary is also not very General but trump is an idiot !
You do not seem to be an American citizen, and a majority of your posts here are in Russian. Let the Americans make their choice. It will be best if the outsiders stay away from this. It is quite evident that you don't know much about Hillary. If you had known a fair bit about her, then you'll be praying for a Donald Trump victory.
In the wake of a hot WW-III (much more likely under a globalist minion like Hillary), Russia does not have the boots to defend against a physical Chinese takeover. In such a
Russia has a lot of nuclear weapons. Why would they need boots?
omg lool why to kill donald trump?? donald trump is much better than hillary clinton which is crrouped girl solded tobig corporai+tions created in americaand she dont care about nobody
you may be right about Hillary and she definitely doesnt deserve to win, but same goes for trump. he is a businessman not a politician. this election is like flipping a coin with both sides end bad. Which is EXACTLY why we must support third parties NOW -- for the future.
Trump supporters whine that 3rd party votes will favor Clinton.
Clinton supporters whine that 3rd party votes will favor Trump.
VOTE GREEN! VOTE LIBERTARIAN!
Here's what you get with TRUMP AND CLINTON:
✔️Fracking
✔️Iraq War
✔️Taking billionaire money
✔️Prosecuting whistle-blowers
In the wake of a hot WW-III (much more likely under a globalist minion like Hillary), Russia does not have the boots to defend against a physical Chinese takeover. In such a scenario Russia's best hope would be that the globalists turn their sino manpower force toward Oceana or the disputed territories but if they end up lacking that capability which could be unfeasible from a technical perspective, they'll likely settle for Mother Russia proper and make that nation a historical footnote for good. That could be handy if it is actually true that Putin really is a nationalist who is not playing ball.
...
China is very unlikely to invade Russia, or any of its stronger neighbors. Despite the huge manpower resources, technologically, the PLA is in very bad shape. Their military technology is ages behind that of Russia and Japan. Their bullying only works against weak nations, such as the Philippines, Vietnam, India, and Myanmar.
Certainly you are right for the here and now. Also historically China has been quite inward looking and, out of necessity, defensive.
I don't want to get off topic to much, but I'm envisioning a scenario where there is a simultaneous world war which brings down population levels and 'creates opportunities', and takeover of most of the world by globalists (generally what are currently our banking and multi-national corporate leaders with input from academia.) The population of China is pre-conditioned to non-democratic rule of this type already so there is little doubt in my mind that they would be easy game, and I'm of the opinion more and more that this population and society is already being used as a test-bed for various ideas. It's relatively straightforward to move a society which has a totalitarian political structure, and the nation has been used by the globalists as a cheap labor pool for a generation giving them a lot of opportunities to develop leverage already. Depending on how much of the population is left after an event, it seems like China may be a good source of manpower for global clean-up operations.
omg lool why to kill donald trump?? donald trump is much better than hillary clinton which is crrouped girl solded tobig corporai+tions created in americaand she dont care about nobody
you may be right about Hillary and she definitely doesnt deserve to win, but same goes for trump. he is a businessman not a politician. this election is like flipping a coin with both sides end bad.
omg lool why to kill donald trump?? donald trump is much better than hillary clinton which is crrouped girl solded tobig corporai+tions created in americaand she dont care about nobody
Come on Wil, don't make us do all the work!
What's this about?
What does "up like Trump" mean for the Donald?
What's your opinion?
Trump protects the interests of big capital. It will be worse than small businesses and large companies will save on their workers. What's this about?
What does "up like Trump" mean for the Donald?
What's your opinion?
"Clinton won the debate last night. And while she was doing it, Trump won the election. He had one thing to accomplish – being less scary – and he did it."
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/151007796236/i-score-the-first-debate
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/151007796236/i-score-the-first-debate
Dilbert is brilliant.
EvilPlasticRobotWomanThing is scary.
In the wake of a hot WW-III (much more likely under a globalist minion like Hillary), Russia does not have the boots to defend against a physical Chinese takeover. In such a scenario Russia's best hope would be that the globalists turn their sino manpower force toward Oceana or the disputed territories but if they end up lacking that capability which could be unfeasible from a technical perspective, they'll likely settle for Mother Russia proper and make that nation a historical footnote for good. That could be handy if it is actually true that Putin really is a nationalist who is not playing ball.
People of the world have been brainwashed for years into thinking that global thermonuclear war would mean the end of the world. I, for one, doubt this very much on technical grounds (though it would certainly suck big-time.) Mostly it would solve some human overpopulation problems and open up some giant possibilities for those who are prepared. If it were planned and choreographed, the possibilities would be much greater.
People of the world have been brainwashed for years into thinking that global thermonuclear war would mean the end of the world. I, for one, doubt this very much on technical grounds (though it would certainly suck big-time.) Mostly it would solve some human overpopulation problems and open up some giant possibilities for those who are prepared. If it were planned and choreographed, the possibilities would be much greater.
China is very unlikely to invade Russia, or any of its stronger neighbors. Despite the huge manpower resources, technologically, the PLA is in very bad shape. Their military technology is ages behind that of Russia and Japan. Their bullying only works against weak nations, such as the Philippines, Vietnam, India, and Myanmar.
Looking at how trump got the votes, it seems to me that the Americans have gone mad ! Hillary is also not very General but trump is an idiot !
You do not seem to be an American citizen, and a majority of your posts here are in Russian. Let the Americans make their choice. It will be best if the outsiders stay away from this. It is quite evident that you don't know much about Hillary. If you had known a fair bit about her, then you'll be praying for a Donald Trump victory.
PARTY!!!!
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-15/ivanka-trump-vacationing-croatia-putins-girlfriend
Looking at how trump got the votes, it seems to me that the Americans have gone mad ! Hillary is also not very General but trump is an idiot !
You do not seem to be an American citizen, and a majority of your posts here are in Russian. Let the Americans make their choice. It will be best if the outsiders stay away from this. It is quite evident that you don't know much about Hillary. If you had known a fair bit about her, then you'll be praying for a Donald Trump victory.
Trump is the death of American supremacy in the world. All who vote for him will regret it. Your children will curse You !
I sense I'm chatting with an AI bot, but I will say that I very much welcome the 'death of American supremacy in the world.' At this point it is a curse for us and for pretty much everyone.
We have the basic foundation to create and maintain a decent life for our citizens, and enough left over to provide a little bit of actual support for others out of genuine good-will if/when they request it. That is not at all what is happening currently.
"Clinton won the debate last night. And while she was doing it, Trump won the election. He had one thing to accomplish – being less scary – and he did it."
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/151007796236/i-score-the-first-debate
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/151007796236/i-score-the-first-debate
Trump is the death of American supremacy in the world. All who vote for him will regret it. Your children will curse You !
Are you joking, Clinton bitch and Clinton Bill have already killed the children of the USA.
Trump will stop all this, don't you know what Donalds position is on war?
Trump is the death of American supremacy in the world. All who vote for him will regret it. Your children will curse You !
Come on Wil, don't make us do all the work!
What's this about?
What does "up like Trump" mean for the Donald?
What's your opinion?
How the trump in this debate drank the water? Hadn't you noticed? View the replay. This confirms that he is lying so much that the throat was dry. What's this about?
What does "up like Trump" mean for the Donald?
What's your opinion?
Looking at how trump got the votes, it seems to me that the Americans have gone mad ! Hillary is also not very General but trump is an idiot !
You do not seem to be an American citizen, and a majority of your posts here are in Russian. Let the Americans make their choice. It will be best if the outsiders stay away from this. It is quite evident that you don't know much about Hillary. If you had known a fair bit about her, then you'll be praying for a Donald Trump victory.
In the wake of a hot WW-III (much more likely under a globalist minion like Hillary), Russia does not have the boots to defend against a physical Chinese takeover. In such a scenario Russia's best hope would be that the globalists turn their sino manpower force toward Oceana or the disputed territories but if they end up lacking that capability which could be unfeasible from a technical perspective, they'll likely settle for Mother Russia proper and make that nation a historical footnote for good. That could be handy if it is actually true that Putin really is a nationalist who is not playing ball.
People of the world have been brainwashed for years into thinking that global thermonuclear war would mean the end of the world. I, for one, doubt this very much on technical grounds (though it would certainly suck big-time.) Mostly it would solve some human overpopulation problems and open up some giant possibilities for those who are prepared. If it were planned and choreographed, the possibilities would be much greater.
Jump to: