75 characters is a weird condition. the main thing of a campaign is to show the signature with links as many as possible. The kind of post doesn't matter.
Not really. It's far more likely that a highly constructive post will attract more attention than a less constructive post made with little effort. If someone had posted
this and another person made a post in the same thread containing just the words "yea i agree", which one do you think would get the most views? And it just so happens that less constructive posts tend to be short and rather spammy. I admit the 75 character limit is odd, and is probably unique to Bitmixer.io but there is definitely a reasoning behind it. hilariousandco explained it rather well:
This sucks, so everyone gets penalized? You should ban payment from the spammers, not put a minimum character count on every post!
It's unfeasible or at the very least hard work to check everyone's posts individually espeially when you have this many paticipants and this is just their way of trying to cut down on spammers. Most people who are contributing relevantly won't have much trouble running into the minimum character limit anyway. Also, making short posts doesn't necessarily mean you're a spammer but bitmixer have decided just to not pay for these posts. Though some people may think its harsh or unfair I think it'll make people put more effort into their posts in the long run so it'll hopefully be a good thing.
There is such a thing as constructive posts that are short and straight to the point. And while quite rare, there are non-constructive posts that span multiple paragraphs too. Bitmixer.io doesn't have the time to sift through posts and sort out constructive posts from non-constructive ones so they applied a general rule that is intended to work in most cases.
EDIT: Not to mention lots of spammy posts can create a negative impression of the service being advertised too.
