No association. No formality. No governing body. No central control. It all would go against the foundation tenets of Bitcoin. The trade off for that freedom is that there is no single message to refute the FUD or bad press. That's OK. It's the individual adoption of each us that stands up against the negative press. Our individual action gives the community strength.
doesn't make it true, and 'we' as the bitcoin community have no duty to sway
public opinion. This is a currency, and 'we' are but users of that currency. Didn't
there used to be a Bitcoin Foundation that ended up being corrupt as hell? That's
exactly what would happen, or similar, if it's tried again. We don't need such a thing
and I vote for no.