Pages:
Author

Topic: US attacked Afghanistan 🇦🇫. (Read 2497 times)

legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1344
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
August 05, 2017, 03:40:40 AM
#54
There are two options for the development of events. 1 is to do everything legally correct And quite the opposite elections, this is to do as the local population wants to do. That's only the local population is the Tatars, and not the Russians. Although, frankly, a simple person has never depended on anything, because I was not only used for them in other purposes.

I am surprised to see so much pro-Muslim propaganda here. Crimea was not the original homeland of Tatars. Crimea was inhabited by Slavs, at least from BC 5000. The Tatars came after the Mongol invasion, during the 13th and 14th centuries AD. Once they captured power in Crimea, the Tatars either enslaved or exterminated the native Slav population.
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 529
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
August 05, 2017, 03:24:40 AM
#53
I think it's very good because US soldiers can help soldiers and Afghans from ISIS terrorist attacks, I really do not like ISIS who expels residents from their homes.

Seriously? The attack on afghanistan isn't even against isis. Isis is a real threat nowadays but i think what happened in the afghan attack is something that needs to be looked further into. Its been rumored that there are other, more personal reasons why it was initiated.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
August 05, 2017, 01:09:13 AM
#52
I think it's very good because US soldiers can help soldiers and Afghans from ISIS terrorist attacks, I really do not like ISIS who expels residents from their homes.
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
August 04, 2017, 08:34:23 PM
#51
Its been the worst decision in the histoty of america. Everyone knows that there isnt any 9/11. people are forced to beleive in it that there was a plane that hit world trade centre though there wasnt any. The decision of attacking afghanistan tends america nowhere but its govt has lost its position in their citizens. People are asking what are the outcomes of spending billions of dollars for attacking afghanistan? Nothing but just it can keep an eye in asian countries.
sr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 250
June 26, 2017, 01:48:18 AM
#50
Yes except Russians run the fucking USSR.  What is your point?  I don't care what you call it. For all practical purposes it was a Russian Empire.

Nope. It was not. If that was the case, then why Crimea was separated from the Russian SSR in 1954, and gifted to the Ukrainian SSR? At that time, the peninsula was overwhelmingly populated by the ethnic Russians.
In order to Crimea was conditions of life for the Crimea joined to Ukraine. Ukraine dug a channel and put fresh water in the Crimea. Additionally, the supply of the Crimea more convenient to do it through Ukraine.

So you are saying that just because Ukraine is providing fresh water to Crimea, the peninsula must surrender its sovereignty and merge with Ukraine? No that is not going to happen. Crimea will remain as a part of Russia, because the overwhelming majority of the population want that.
There are two options for the development of events. 1 is to do everything legally correct And quite the opposite elections, this is to do as the local population wants to do. That's only the local population is the Tatars, and not the Russians. Although, frankly, a simple person has never depended on anything, because I was not only used for them in other purposes.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1344
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 17, 2017, 09:36:11 PM
#49
Yes except Russians run the fucking USSR.  What is your point?  I don't care what you call it. For all practical purposes it was a Russian Empire.

Nope. It was not. If that was the case, then why Crimea was separated from the Russian SSR in 1954, and gifted to the Ukrainian SSR? At that time, the peninsula was overwhelmingly populated by the ethnic Russians.
In order to Crimea was conditions of life for the Crimea joined to Ukraine. Ukraine dug a channel and put fresh water in the Crimea. Additionally, the supply of the Crimea more convenient to do it through Ukraine.

So you are saying that just because Ukraine is providing fresh water to Crimea, the peninsula must surrender its sovereignty and merge with Ukraine? No that is not going to happen. Crimea will remain as a part of Russia, because the overwhelming majority of the population want that.
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 263
April 17, 2017, 06:57:58 PM
#48
Yes except Russians run the fucking USSR.  What is your point?  I don't care what you call it. For all practical purposes it was a Russian Empire.

Nope. It was not. If that was the case, then why Crimea was separated from the Russian SSR in 1954, and gifted to the Ukrainian SSR? At that time, the peninsula was overwhelmingly populated by the ethnic Russians.
In order to Crimea was conditions of life for the Crimea joined to Ukraine. Ukraine dug a channel and put fresh water in the Crimea. Additionally, the supply of the Crimea more convenient to do it through Ukraine.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
April 17, 2017, 10:19:34 AM
#47
Yes except Russians run the fucking USSR.  What is your point?  I don't care what you call it. For all practical purposes it was a Russian Empire.

Nope. It was not. If that was the case, then why Crimea was separated from the Russian SSR in 1954, and gifted to the Ukrainian SSR? At that time, the peninsula was overwhelmingly populated by the ethnic Russians.

Late apology for starving (holodomor) and forcing millions of ukranians in gulags to death.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
April 17, 2017, 08:20:43 AM
#46
Yes except Russians run the fucking USSR.  What is your point?  I don't care what you call it. For all practical purposes it was a Russian Empire.

Nope. It was not. If that was the case, then why Crimea was separated from the Russian SSR in 1954, and gifted to the Ukrainian SSR? At that time, the peninsula was overwhelmingly populated by the ethnic Russians.
At that time the Peninsula was not inhabited for the development of its infrastructure it needed to connect to the mainland of Ukraine. In addition, the part of the Ukrainian lands went to Russia.
legendary
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1106
April 17, 2017, 06:43:25 AM
#45
Uneducated bunch of silly sig spammers  Smiley

And I see you around here in the forum, discriminating people. How's your Finland? I was under the impression that you live there when you told off people in another thread to not go there and suck off your welfare simply because they expressed a desire to visit it at least once. Maybe you really deserve those immigrants...

Na. Do you really think people living off a sig campaign and who barely speak english are your typical european traveller? Really?
99% of people posting here are some bots that just want to push their post counter for the sig campaign.

And if these people will come here the first thing they want will be welfare.

In relation to the US we in europe have unlimited welfare.

Well you don't need sig campaigners to ruin everything for you. I don't believe you'll be forced to retain any overstaying tourists, you can always deport them. The refugees though... you already shipped them into your country and forced to care for them. Those are not leaving anytime soon. Either you'll increase tax even higher (I believe in some countries it's already 50%) or reduce benefits to stretch the limited money.

Sorry for telling you you deserve this. I just find it sad that by the time I'm probably already well-off to travel, Europe would no longer be recognizable.

Guess I'll just have to save to travel to another Asian country. Hopefully further ASEAN integration would make the fare cheaper.

BTW you mentioned bots. Is that even a thing in forums? I thought they only exist in games.

Refugees can stay as long it is not save to return. But when it is safe we expect most people to go back home with only a small part staying here.
Refugee status != resident status

Bots are always a thing if you can earn money with it - not only in games. And yes this forum already had a lot of trouble with bots.

there are some who are poorely educated,it is pretty obvious who they are
also living in their stereotypical house of cards world,selfrighteous and so sure of their supremacy
things are changing and changing rapidly,get ready
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1344
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 17, 2017, 04:03:47 AM
#44
Yes except Russians run the fucking USSR.  What is your point?  I don't care what you call it. For all practical purposes it was a Russian Empire.

Nope. It was not. If that was the case, then why Crimea was separated from the Russian SSR in 1954, and gifted to the Ukrainian SSR? At that time, the peninsula was overwhelmingly populated by the ethnic Russians.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 500
April 16, 2017, 04:45:40 PM
#43
This will be result of world war 3 if they will don't stop attacking this country also syria maybe russian or putting will declare war against those country who are agreesively attacked this without notifying it north korea also against on this attacked this will be great for them to make money.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1344
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 16, 2017, 03:24:35 PM
#42
The US is very aggressive lately, I don't like that.

The US has been aggressive ever since the end of the WW2, and that was almost 7 decades back. During this time period, they have invaded or intervened in more than 70 different nations (at a rate of 1 country per year).
The world is cruel. You forget that in all these conflicts, always on the opposite side fought Russia. In the same Afghanistan the first troops entered the Soviet Union. Lately I'm more worried about the aggressive policy of Russia than of America. Both of these countries brought a lot of grief in the world. Maybe when Russia will disintegrate will no longer such a confrontation, and the world will be safer?

During the cold war, there was no Russia. There was only the USSR. And they intervened militarily only in a handful of countries during 1945-90. And in most of these nations, the Soviet troops were deployed after the local governments requested for the same.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
April 16, 2017, 01:55:51 PM
#41
Uneducated bunch of silly sig spammers  Smiley

And I see you around here in the forum, discriminating people. How's your Finland? I was under the impression that you live there when you told off people in another thread to not go there and suck off your welfare simply because they expressed a desire to visit it at least once. Maybe you really deserve those immigrants...

Na. Do you really think people living off a sig campaign and who barely speak english are your typical european traveller? Really?
99% of people posting here are some bots that just want to push their post counter for the sig campaign.

And if these people will come here the first thing they want will be welfare.

In relation to the US we in europe have unlimited welfare.

Well you don't need sig campaigners to ruin everything for you. I don't believe you'll be forced to retain any overstaying tourists, you can always deport them. The refugees though... you already shipped them into your country and forced to care for them. Those are not leaving anytime soon. Either you'll increase tax even higher (I believe in some countries it's already 50%) or reduce benefits to stretch the limited money.

Sorry for telling you you deserve this. I just find it sad that by the time I'm probably already well-off to travel, Europe would no longer be recognizable.

Guess I'll just have to save to travel to another Asian country. Hopefully further ASEAN integration would make the fare cheaper.

BTW you mentioned bots. Is that even a thing in forums? I thought they only exist in games.

Refugees can stay as long it is not save to return. But when it is safe we expect most people to go back home with only a small part staying here.
Refugee status != resident status

Bots are always a thing if you can earn money with it - not only in games. And yes this forum already had a lot of trouble with bots.
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 584
April 16, 2017, 01:42:41 PM
#40
Uneducated bunch of silly sig spammers  Smiley

And I see you around here in the forum, discriminating people. How's your Finland? I was under the impression that you live there when you told off people in another thread to not go there and suck off your welfare simply because they expressed a desire to visit it at least once. Maybe you really deserve those immigrants...

Na. Do you really think people living off a sig campaign and who barely speak english are your typical european traveller? Really?
99% of people posting here are some bots that just want to push their post counter for the sig campaign.

And if these people will come here the first thing they want will be welfare.

In relation to the US we in europe have unlimited welfare.

Well you don't need sig campaigners to ruin everything for you. I don't believe you'll be forced to retain any overstaying tourists, you can always deport them. The refugees though... you already shipped them into your country and forced to care for them. Those are not leaving anytime soon. Either you'll increase tax even higher (I believe in some countries it's already 50%) or reduce benefits to stretch the limited money.

Sorry for telling you you deserve this. I just find it sad that by the time I'm probably already well-off to travel, Europe would no longer be recognizable.

Guess I'll just have to save to travel to another Asian country. Hopefully further ASEAN integration would make the fare cheaper.

BTW you mentioned bots. Is that even a thing in forums? I thought they only exist in games.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
April 16, 2017, 08:17:17 AM
#39
The US is very aggressive lately, I don't like that.

The US has been aggressive ever since the end of the WW2, and that was almost 7 decades back. During this time period, they have invaded or intervened in more than 70 different nations (at a rate of 1 country per year).
The world is cruel. You forget that in all these conflicts, always on the opposite side fought Russia. In the same Afghanistan the first troops entered the Soviet Union. Lately I'm more worried about the aggressive policy of Russia than of America. Both of these countries brought a lot of grief in the world. Maybe when Russia will disintegrate will no longer such a confrontation, and the world will be safer?
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
April 15, 2017, 07:55:13 PM
#38
Uneducated bunch of silly sig spammers  Smiley

And I see you around here in the forum, discriminating people. How's your Finland? I was under the impression that you live there when you told off people in another thread to not go there and suck off your welfare simply because they expressed a desire to visit it at least once. Maybe you really deserve those immigrants...

Na. Do you really think people living off a sig campaign and who barely speak english are your typical european traveller? Really?
99% of people posting here are some bots that just want to push their post counter for the sig campaign.

And if these people will come here the first thing they want will be welfare.

In relation to the US we in europe have unlimited welfare.
Here really with your incomes not to argue. Europe really went far by social standards, even in contrast to the US. Although the states also have their own successes. But I want to say one true thing that if someone does something or writes something, then this has a definite purpose.

Sure.
There are people who lie to support their agenda.
There are people who just dont know or dont understand.
There are people who are just too lazy to research and investigate certain topics.

And then there are 50-75% of non sense posting sig spammers that i really dislike.
member
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
April 15, 2017, 07:41:50 PM
#37
Uneducated bunch of silly sig spammers  Smiley

And I see you around here in the forum, discriminating people. How's your Finland? I was under the impression that you live there when you told off people in another thread to not go there and suck off your welfare simply because they expressed a desire to visit it at least once. Maybe you really deserve those immigrants...

Na. Do you really think people living off a sig campaign and who barely speak english are your typical european traveller? Really?
99% of people posting here are some bots that just want to push their post counter for the sig campaign.

And if these people will come here the first thing they want will be welfare.

In relation to the US we in europe have unlimited welfare.
Here really with your incomes not to argue. Europe really went far by social standards, even in contrast to the US. Although the states also have their own successes. But I want to say one true thing that if someone does something or writes something, then this has a definite purpose.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
April 15, 2017, 12:46:21 PM
#36
Uneducated bunch of silly sig spammers  Smiley

And I see you around here in the forum, discriminating people. How's your Finland? I was under the impression that you live there when you told off people in another thread to not go there and suck off your welfare simply because they expressed a desire to visit it at least once. Maybe you really deserve those immigrants...

Na. Do you really think people living off a sig campaign and who barely speak english are your typical european traveller? Really?
99% of people posting here are some bots that just want to push their post counter for the sig campaign.

And if these people will come here the first thing they want will be welfare.

In relation to the US we in europe have unlimited welfare.
legendary
Activity: 1245
Merit: 1004
April 15, 2017, 12:38:08 PM
#35
Many people still say for some reason, that US has created the ISIS , but I cannot understand why would they spend resources now, and possibly start war with Afghanistan ( because of the GBU-43 bomb )
to eliminate ISIS soldiers, when they are under their jurisdiction? Makes no sense for me, but If someone knows something about that theory, then I would be very glad to hear an explanation.
The US neither "created" nor "control" ISIS. But there does exist some storyline about the initial formation days pointing back at detention camp "Bukka". If you collect suspected islamic extremists in a war zone and place them into a camp they will start to recognize each other, and how many they are.
They state for themselfes that has been their moment of formation, but maybe other stories are floating around too.
Pages:
Jump to: