Pages:
Author

Topic: US attacked Afghanistan 🇦🇫. - page 2. (Read 2497 times)

member
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
April 15, 2017, 10:59:39 AM
#34
The US is very aggressive lately, I don't like that.

The US has been aggressive ever since the end of the WW2, and that was almost 7 decades back. During this time period, they have invaded or intervened in more than 70 different nations (at a rate of 1 country per year).

More aggressive than usually then. I agree with you.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1344
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 15, 2017, 10:55:01 AM
#33
The US is very aggressive lately, I don't like that.

The US has been aggressive ever since the end of the WW2, and that was almost 7 decades back. During this time period, they have invaded or intervened in more than 70 different nations (at a rate of 1 country per year).
member
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
April 15, 2017, 10:34:30 AM
#32
The US is very aggressive lately, I don't like that.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
April 15, 2017, 10:33:11 AM
#31
I read about it and they spent millions on just 1 bomb and God knows if it killed only terrorists or civilians. Trump did what he said and it's the worst decision ever made. Bombing won't do anyone good and if they want a surgical strike, they should only test its weapons to target the terrorist and not civilians.
Its sad to see that US has taken these countries as a testing ground for their weapons.Now Russia may follow the same path and test its weapons in some other country.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1094
April 15, 2017, 10:01:30 AM
#30
I read about it and they spent millions on just 1 bomb and God knows if it killed only terrorists or civilians. Trump did what he said and it's the worst decision ever made. Bombing won't do anyone good and if they want a surgical strike, they should only target the terrorist and not civilians.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
April 15, 2017, 09:55:18 AM
#29
Afghan authorities Saturday reported a jump in fatalities from the American military's largest non-nuclear bomb, declaring some 90 Islamic State fighters dead, as US-led ground forces advanced on their mountain hideouts. "At least 92 Daesh (IS) fighters were killed in the bombing," Achin district governor Esmail Shinwari told AFP on Saturday. Shinwari insisted there were "no military and civilian casualties at all".

i find that too good to be true as the scale of this bomb most likely would take several civilians with it. It's sad that in order for us to eliminate these terrorists, civilians who have done nothing wrong would have to be affected. And these people most likely are looking to the us for help
There is no punishment without guilt. Why are these civilians allowed to have their country ruled by terrorists. And who are these terrorists? Did the children of these civilians join the ranks of the terrorists. Each person must answer for their action or inaction.
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 529
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
April 15, 2017, 09:49:27 AM
#28
Afghan authorities Saturday reported a jump in fatalities from the American military's largest non-nuclear bomb, declaring some 90 Islamic State fighters dead, as US-led ground forces advanced on their mountain hideouts. "At least 92 Daesh (IS) fighters were killed in the bombing," Achin district governor Esmail Shinwari told AFP on Saturday. Shinwari insisted there were "no military and civilian casualties at all".

i find that too good to be true as the scale of this bomb most likely would take several civilians with it. It's sad that in order for us to eliminate these terrorists, civilians who have done nothing wrong would have to be affected. And these people most likely are looking to the us for help
sr. member
Activity: 532
Merit: 250
April 15, 2017, 08:42:37 AM
#27
They're going down for sure under Trump's administration.
I think actually the same, that mr.Donald Trump will finally vanquish the terror that ISIS is doing on many continents through last years.
Many people still say for some reason, that US has created the ISIS , but I cannot understand why would they spend resources now, and possibly start war with Afghanistan ( because of the GBU-43 bomb )
to eliminate ISIS soldiers, when they are under their jurisdiction? Makes no sense for me, but If someone knows something about that theory, then I would be very glad to hear an explanation.

I assume that Trump decided he has enough of ISIS terror, so he decided to grow some fear among his enemies, that he is not scared of consequences, even when bombing other country places.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
April 15, 2017, 08:32:05 AM
#26
Afghan authorities Saturday reported a jump in fatalities from the American military's largest non-nuclear bomb, declaring some 90 Islamic State fighters dead, as US-led ground forces advanced on their mountain hideouts. "At least 92 Daesh (IS) fighters were killed in the bombing," Achin district governor Esmail Shinwari told AFP on Saturday. Shinwari insisted there were "no military and civilian casualties at all".
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 584
April 15, 2017, 07:18:32 AM
#25
Uneducated bunch of silly sig spammers  Smiley

And I see you around here in the forum, discriminating people. How's your Finland? I was under the impression that you live there when you told off people in another thread to not go there and suck off your welfare simply because they expressed a desire to visit it at least once. Maybe you really deserve those immigrants...
sr. member
Activity: 265
Merit: 250
April 14, 2017, 07:20:49 PM
#24
Some people speculate..

1) Maybe it has to do with the financial infrastructure of the global munitions business. No longer an industry segregated by countries, today the same groups collaborate on profiting from both sides of a war.

BLU-82B costed 20.000 USD back in it's days. Has been good enough against Tora Bora, Afghanistan

GBU-43/B comes like 14.600.000 USD there is some visible incline in pricings

Pricings for Tomahawks resupply currently rising, multiplied by numbers needed (<30% hit rate)

Not that much of a war against terror anymore, more like a war against budgets
Something in the last people who live in different countries, have become very politicized, as a result of hatred of people and everything around them. I do not think that the world will last so long.
legendary
Activity: 1245
Merit: 1004
April 14, 2017, 12:52:06 PM
#23
Some people speculate..

1) Maybe it has to do with the financial infrastructure of the global munitions business. No longer an industry segregated by countries, today the same groups collaborate on profiting from both sides of a war.

BLU-82B costed 20.000 USD back in it's days. Has been good enough against Tora Bora, Afghanistan

GBU-43/B comes like 14.600.000 USD there is some visible incline in pricings

Pricings for Tomahawks resupply currently rising, multiplied by numbers needed (<30% hit rate)

Not that much of a war against terror anymore, more like a war against budgets
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
April 14, 2017, 12:15:06 PM
#22
US dropped the biggest non-nuclear bomb in Afghanistan... what are your thoughts on this guys?

https://www.google.com.pk/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/04/13/politics/afghanistan-isis-moab-bomb/index.html
Based on the news that I read they drop that bomb in ISIS base but I hope theirs no big number of innocence that died their because of that bomb

Yes, I hope no civilians die as a result of dropping this kind of weapons. Let just ISIS died and spare those innocent. But ISIS is known for using human shield because they know that if innocent people die, US will be condemn but other countries and more Muslims will use this as an excuse to put hatred in US and other countries that support US.
Why only ISIS? The tactics of human shields used by the Germans and the Russians during the second world war. The same tactics Putin uses the capture of the Crimea and the Donbass. Sometimes it is better to sacrifice the lives of 10 people, but to save the lives of thousands.

So how many civilians lived in the taliban tunnels up in the mountains?

Care to give us insider informations? Roll Eyes

Russian bots at it again.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
April 14, 2017, 12:10:24 PM
#21
US dropped the biggest non-nuclear bomb in Afghanistan... what are your thoughts on this guys?

https://www.google.com.pk/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/04/13/politics/afghanistan-isis-moab-bomb/index.html
Based on the news that I read they drop that bomb in ISIS base but I hope theirs no big number of innocence that died their because of that bomb

Yes, I hope no civilians die as a result of dropping this kind of weapons. Let just ISIS died and spare those innocent. But ISIS is known for using human shield because they know that if innocent people die, US will be condemn but other countries and more Muslims will use this as an excuse to put hatred in US and other countries that support US.
Why only ISIS? The tactics of human shields used by the Germans and the Russians during the second world war. The same tactics Putin uses the capture of the Crimea and the Donbass. Sometimes it is better to sacrifice the lives of 10 people, but to save the lives of thousands.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
April 14, 2017, 11:59:34 AM
#20
Uneducated bunch of silly sig spammers  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 256
April 14, 2017, 11:54:18 AM
#19
US dropped the biggest non-nuclear bomb in Afghanistan... what are your thoughts on this guys?

https://www.google.com.pk/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/04/13/politics/afghanistan-isis-moab-bomb/index.html
Based on the news that I read they drop that bomb in ISIS base but I hope theirs no big number of innocence that died their because of that bomb

Yes, I hope no civilians die as a result of dropping this kind of weapons. Let just ISIS died and spare those innocent. But ISIS is known for using human shield because they know that if innocent people die, US will be condemn but other countries and more Muslims will use this as an excuse to put hatred in US and other countries that support US.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
April 14, 2017, 11:15:56 AM
#18
US dropped the biggest non-nuclear bomb in Afghanistan... what are your thoughts on this guys?

https://www.google.com.pk/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/04/13/politics/afghanistan-isis-moab-bomb/index.html
I just read this news this war is going to be insane more innocent people are going to die how if those leader going to fight 1 on 1 and kill each other than sending those innocent people just to kill.
US just need a testing ground to test its weapons.This time Afghanistan and next time, may be another islamic country.It seems US govt has taken innocent muslim lives in afghanistan,syria,iraq,etc.etc.etc as very cheap.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
🌟-=BitCAD=-🌟 New_Business_Era
April 14, 2017, 10:45:03 AM
#17
US dropped the biggest non-nuclear bomb in Afghanistan... what are your thoughts on this guys?

https://www.google.com.pk/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/04/13/politics/afghanistan-isis-moab-bomb/index.html
Based on the news that I read they drop that bomb in ISIS base but I hope theirs no big number of innocence that died their because of that bomb
hero member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 530
April 14, 2017, 09:31:35 AM
#16
US dropped the biggest non-nuclear bomb in Afghanistan... what are your thoughts on this guys?

https://www.google.com.pk/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/04/13/politics/afghanistan-isis-moab-bomb/index.html
I just read this news this war is going to be insane more innocent people are going to die how if those leader going to fight 1 on 1 and kill each other than sending those innocent people just to kill.
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 584
April 14, 2017, 09:01:52 AM
#15
US dropped the biggest non-nuclear bomb in Afghanistan... what are your thoughts on this guys?

https://www.google.com.pk/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/04/13/politics/afghanistan-isis-moab-bomb/index.html
The US and Afghan forces were unable to advance because ISIS had mined the area with explosives, so the bomb was dropped to clear the tunnels

That makes sense. Why risk sending soldiers there when you can just get rid of the mines along with those terrorists. Now you've mentioned this I was reminded of that satellite used by a villain in an old Bond movie to clear mines to allow his army to come in more easily.

Just to remind everyone here: The Taliban was created during the late 1970s by the CIA and the other American agencies, to fight against the Soviet invasion force in Afghanistan. Back then, they were considered as heroes in the Western nations:




Yes we know that. The better question would be, should America have allowed the Soviets to conquer Afghanistan? This is not the first time America intervened to stop an invasion. Remember when Saddam Hussein tried to invade Kuwait and Saudi Arabia?

And how were the American repaid?
Pages:
Jump to: