Pages:
Author

Topic: **US** BitFury Setup Guide - page 22. (Read 53268 times)

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
September 10, 2013, 04:24:02 PM
Has anyone had any luck getting more than 4 h-boards running on the same m-board?  My rig is stable with all boards running at above 25gh/s when I have 4 h-boards.  When I add the next 4 h-boards they seem to auto tune down in speed to the point where the output on an 8 h-board rig is no faster than a 4 h-board rig.  Anyone have any hints?

/cet

What are you seeing when you look at /run/shm/.stat.log?


Details Posted here.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3103697

And I did these steps to order and insert the cards with least amount of slow/bad chips at the start and the bad boards at the back.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3119313

From this:

Code:
0:      825     29.936  31.836  2091    100     0       0       15      1       0       (1.871/chip)    95%
1:      880     31.081  33.083  2171    101     0       0       16      0       0       (1.943/chip)    100%
2:      880     28.146  30.821  1966    35      0       0       16      0       0       (1.759/chip)    98%
3:      770     26.285  29.690  1836    193     1       0       14      2       0       (1.643/chip)    86%
4:      770     25.641  28.031  1791    145     1       0       14      2       0       (1.603/chip)    92%
5:      825     29.664  31.286  2072    85      1       0       15      0       1       (1.854/chip)    93%
6:      880     21.289  22.873  1487    94      1       0       16      0       0       (1.331/chip)    97%
7:      880     28.390  29.986  1983    107     1       0       16      0       0       (1.774/chip)    99%


I'll have to come back to this, meeting time Sad
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
September 10, 2013, 03:58:41 PM
Has anyone had any luck getting more than 4 h-boards running on the same m-board?  My rig is stable with all boards running at above 25gh/s when I have 4 h-boards.  When I add the next 4 h-boards they seem to auto tune down in speed to the point where the output on an 8 h-board rig is no faster than a 4 h-board rig.  Anyone have any hints?

/cet

What are you seeing when you look at /run/shm/.stat.log?


Details Posted here.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3103697

And I did these steps to order and insert the cards with least amount of slow/bad chips at the start and the bad boards at the back.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3119313
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
September 10, 2013, 03:52:36 PM
Has anyone had any luck getting more than 4 h-boards running on the same m-board?  My rig is stable with all boards running at above 25gh/s when I have 4 h-boards.  When I add the next 4 h-boards they seem to auto tune down in speed to the point where the output on an 8 h-board rig is no faster than a 4 h-board rig.  Anyone have any hints?

/cet

What are you seeing when you look at /run/shm/.stat.log?

legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
September 10, 2013, 03:49:52 PM
Has anyone had any luck getting more than 4 h-boards running on the same m-board?  My rig is stable with all boards running at above 25gh/s when I have 4 h-boards.  When I add the next 4 h-boards they seem to auto tune down in speed to the point where the output on an 8 h-board rig is no faster than a 4 h-board rig.  Anyone have any hints?

/cet

I have 16 on an mboard v1 and have fans on them.  pulls between 350 and 370watts.
cet
member
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
September 10, 2013, 02:14:18 PM
Has anyone had any luck getting more than 4 h-boards running on the same m-board?  My rig is stable with all boards running at above 25gh/s when I have 4 h-boards.  When I add the next 4 h-boards they seem to auto tune down in speed to the point where the output on an 8 h-board rig is no faster than a 4 h-board rig.  Anyone have any hints?

/cet
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
September 10, 2013, 01:47:46 PM
Sorry if this has already been mentioned somewhere in this thread or in the long "Bitfury in the U.S." thread:

I was not able to get the starter kit mining against us2.eclipsemc.com
Both the Eclipse status page and the apache status page on the Raspberry Pi showed 0 GH/s
Restarting the miner and/or the stratum proxy did not help.

However, once I started mining against stratum.mining.eligius.st, everything started working and the
starter kit achieves its advertised hash rate of 25 GH/s.

Maybe this note should be put into the first post, if someone else can confirm this issue.

Try port 3333, it's working for me.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 501
September 10, 2013, 01:38:11 PM
Nope - I mine just fine using us1 or us2.eclipsemc.com.  Just make certain you use port 3333.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
September 10, 2013, 01:34:11 PM
Sorry if this has already been mentioned somewhere in this thread or in the long "Bitfury in the U.S." thread:

I was not able to get the starter kit mining against us2.eclipsemc.com
Both the Eclipse status page and the apache status page on the Raspberry Pi showed 0 GH/s
Restarting the miner and/or the stratum proxy did not help.

However, once I started mining against stratum.mining.eligius.st, everything started working and the
starter kit achieves its advertised hash rate of 25 GH/s.

Maybe this note should be put into the first post, if someone else can confirm this issue.
member
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
September 10, 2013, 01:19:57 PM
What does it mean when you have low rates?  And a "speed up" for one of them?
Is this a pool issue?  Or chip issue?

1       AIfDSo  55      0.501   0.507   35      5       0       1       48      [0:0]   0       2 2 2 1 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 1 2 2 2         0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
2       AIfDSo  55      0.301   0.476   21      2       0       0       45      [0:1]   0       2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1         0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
3       AIfDSo  55      0.387   0.497   27      0       0       0       47      [0:2]   0       2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2         0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4       AIfDSo  55      0.429   0.497   30      2       0       0       47      [0:3]   0       2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2         0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5       AIfDSo  55      0.558   0.476   39      2       0       0       45      [0:4]   0       3 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3         0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
6       AIfDSo  55      0.329   0.486   23      3       0       0       46      [0:5]   0       2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1         0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7       AIfDSo  55      0.429   0.528   30      3       0       0       50      [0:6]   36      2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2         1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
8       AIfDSo  55      0.358   0.497   25      3       0       0       47      [0:7]   36      1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2         1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9       AiFDso  55      0.129   0.159   9       3       0       0       15      [0:8]   405     0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0         0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0        speed up
10      AIfDSo  55      0.401   0.486   28      4       0       0       46      [0:9]   0       1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2         1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
11      AIfDSo  55      0.458   0.423   32      1       0       0       40      [0:A]   36      2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 2         0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
12      AIfDSo  55      0.387   0.486   27      3       0       0       46      [0:B]   0       2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1         0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1
13      AIfDSo  55      0.501   0.497   35      0       0       0       47      [0:C]   36      2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2         0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14      AIfDSo  55      0.415   0.539   29      2       0       0       51      [0:D]   0       2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2         0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
15      AIfDSo  55      0.401   0.497   28      6       0       0       47      [0:E]   0       2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1         0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1
16      AIfDSo  55      0.472   0.528   33      2       0       0       50      [0:F]   0       2 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2         0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
speed:825 noncerate[GH/s]:6.457 (0.404/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:7.578 good:451 errors:41 spi-err:0 miso-err:1 jobs:326 cores:95% good:15 bad:1 off:0 (best[GH/s]:27.760) Tue Sep 10 18:16:21 2013
0:      825     6.457   7.578   451     41      0       1       15      1       0       (0.404/chip)    95%

newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
September 10, 2013, 09:00:57 AM
I'm not certain what's going on with that address - doesn't seem to be up...

C:\Users\x>ping mint.bitminter.com

Pinging us1.bitminter.com [192.31.187.114] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.


To prevent ddos-ing they may be dropping ICMP echoes.   Ping may not be a reliable check of accessibility.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Crypto Investor ;) @ Farmed Account Hunter
September 10, 2013, 08:47:51 AM
Quote
After you do that then wait about 30 minutes, then run nano /run/shm/.stat.log

If you notice any chips pushing 0.600 or below turn them off by replacing AIfDSo to aifdso on the same line number as the chip. This is important because auto tuning will keep working with them if it can causing errors that may throw off some pools.


How to I save the file after modifying? I get Permission denied.

Thanks
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Crypto Investor ;) @ Farmed Account Hunter
September 10, 2013, 07:31:31 AM
I'm not certain what's going on with that address - doesn't seem to be up...

C:\Users\x>ping mint.bitminter.com

Pinging us1.bitminter.com [192.31.187.114] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.


I actually do get replies from it... 70ms
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 501
September 10, 2013, 07:29:03 AM
I'm not certain what's going on with that address - doesn't seem to be up...

C:\Users\x>ping mint.bitminter.com

Pinging us1.bitminter.com [192.31.187.114] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Crypto Investor ;) @ Farmed Account Hunter
September 10, 2013, 07:23:55 AM
Ok, I am about had it with Slashe's constant weird fluctuations.
Trying to setup Bitminter pool,.. but I just cant seem to figure it out.

2. Enabled (1 or 0), Pool address, port, user, password
Yes mint.bitminter.com 8332 workername_BF password

But when I fire that off just by itself Hashrate drops to 0 so I know it's not connecting.

Am I missing something?

Chainminer doesn't always like ports that aren't 3333.  It specifically doesn't like port 8332.  Change that to 3333 and it should work for you.

I got nothing. Sad
Even tried port forwarding in the firewall...
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 501
September 10, 2013, 06:59:55 AM
Ok, I am about had it with Slashe's constant weird fluctuations.
Trying to setup Bitminter pool,.. but I just cant seem to figure it out.

2. Enabled (1 or 0), Pool address, port, user, password
Yes mint.bitminter.com 8332 workername_BF password

But when I fire that off just by itself Hashrate drops to 0 so I know it's not connecting.

Am I missing something?

Chainminer doesn't always like ports that aren't 3333.  It specifically doesn't like port 8332.  Change that to 3333 and it should work for you.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Crypto Investor ;) @ Farmed Account Hunter
September 10, 2013, 06:58:03 AM
Ok, I am about had it with Slashe's constant weird fluctuations.
Trying to setup Bitminter pool,.. but I just cant seem to figure it out.

2. Enabled (1 or 0), Pool address, port, user, password
Yes mint.bitminter.com 8332 workername_BF password

But when I fire that off just by itself Hashrate drops to 0 so I know it's not connecting.

Am I missing something?
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Crypto Investor ;) @ Farmed Account Hunter
September 10, 2013, 06:53:01 AM
Looks like your second board is an EOL board, and has a problem starting at, or just after, the 8th chip.  U47 or U48...

So I gotta scrape the connections off somewhere? lol
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 501
September 10, 2013, 06:39:57 AM
Looks like your second board is an EOL board, and has a problem starting at, or just after, the 8th chip.  U47 or U48...
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Crypto Investor ;) @ Farmed Account Hunter
September 10, 2013, 06:30:07 AM
1       AIfDSo  55      1.360   1.575   95      10      0       1       149     [0:0]   665     6 7 7 7 7 6 4 5 6 6 3 6 6 6 6 7         1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 0
2       AIfDSo  55      1.374   1.501   96      6       0       0       142     [0:1]   665     6 6 5 6 5 5 6 6 7 6 6 7 7 6 6 6         0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
3       AIfDSo  55      0.816   1.533   57      24      0       0       145     [0:2]   702     3 3 4 5 2 5 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 5 3         2 2 1 0 3 0 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 0 2
4       AIfDSo  55      1.432   1.543   100     8       0       0       146     [0:3]   660     7 5 6 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 5 7 6 6 5 6         0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 0
5       AIfDSo  55      1.417   1.501   99      6       0       0       142     [0:4]   663     6 7 7 6 5 5 5 6 6 6 5 7 7 7 7 7         1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
6       AIfDSo  55      1.074   1.522   75      10      0       0       144     [0:5]   686     4 6 2 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 6 6 5         2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1
7       AIfDSo  55      1.460   1.554   102     3       0       0       147     [0:6]   658     6 6 6 5 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 6 6 6         0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8       AIfDSo  55      1.475   1.501   103     8       0       0       142     [0:7]   658     6 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 7 6 6 6 6 6         1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
9       AIfDSo  55      1.847   1.638   129     1       0       0       155     [0:8]   641     8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8         0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10      AIfDSo  55      1.632   1.607   114     8       0       0       152     [0:9]   647     8 7 7 7 8 7 6 7 6 7 7 8 8 7 7 7         0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
11      AIfDSo  55      1.646   1.575   115     5       0       0       149     [0:A]   648     8 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 7 7 7 7         0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1
12      AIfDSo  55      1.403   1.501   98      3       0       0       142     [0:B]   669     6 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 7 6 7 7 7 6 6         0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
13      AIfDSo  55      1.475   1.522   103     5       0       0       144     [0:C]   660     7 6 7 7 6 7 6 6 6 5 7 7 6 7 7 6         0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
14      AIfDSo  55      1.432   1.564   100     6       0       0       148     [0:D]   664     6 5 6 6 6 6 5 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6         1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
15      AIfDSo  55      1.532   1.564   107     4       0       0       148     [0:E]   654     7 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 6 6 5 7 7 7 7 7         0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
16      AIfDSo  55      1.646   1.554   115     5       0       0       147     [0:F]   648     7 6 6 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 6         0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
17      AIfDSo  55      1.790   1.913   125     3       0       0       181     [1:0]   641     8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 7         0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
18      AIfDSo  55      2.004   2.082   140     3       0       0       197     [1:1]   631     9 8 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 8         0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
19      AIfDSo  55      1.804   1.850   126     4       0       0       175     [1:2]   642     8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8         0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
20      AIfDSo  55      2.248   1.924   157     4       0       0       182     [1:3]   615     10 10 10 9 10 10 8 10 10 11 10 10 9 10 10 10    0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
21      AIfDSo  55      1.689   1.955   118     3       0       0       185     [1:4]   645     8 8 8 8 7 8 7 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7         0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
22      AIfDSo  55      1.546   1.638   108     9       0       0       155     [1:5]   654     6 5 6 7 6 7 7 8 7 8 8 7 7 6 7 6         1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
23      AIfDSo  55      1.646   1.903   115     2       0       0       180     [1:6]   656     7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 7 7 8 8         0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
24      AIfDSo  55      2.004   1.892   140     5       0       0       179     [1:7]   628     9 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 8 10 6 9 9 9 9 9        0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
25      AIfDSo  55      0.000   2.072   0       0       0       0       196     [1:8]   756     0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0         0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
speed:1375 noncerate[GH/s]:37.753 (1.510/chip) hashrate[GH/s]:41.983 good:2637 errors:145 spi-err:0 miso-err:1 jobs:371 cores:13% good:25 bad:0 off:0 (best[GH/s]:0.000) Tue Sep 10 11:24:38 2013
0:      880     23.021  24.754  1608    112     0       1       16      0       0       (1.439/chip)    12%
1:      495     14.732  17.229  1029    33      0       0       9       0       0       (1.637/chip)    14%


Who can decipher this? I am clueless right now as to what I should even be looking at, lol.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
Crypto Investor ;) @ Farmed Account Hunter
September 10, 2013, 06:28:05 AM
so which pool works best with bitfury ? people should have an idea by now
friend reporting huge difference between slushs pool and web panel

My Slashes pool went bonkers overnight... BF reporting ~38Gh/s with Slashes was just under 7Gh/s
Now all rebooting etc.. 38Gh/s at BF and 12.6Gh/s at Slashes.. grrrrr
Pages:
Jump to: