Topic: US-China economy war + radical Trump = higher inflation + interest rates + war (Read 386 times)

Well, let's broaden our view. The USSR, and then after its collapse Russia, have always been strategic opponents of the USA, and all the time after World War II the USA was preparing for a military confrontation with Russia. Russia's attack on Ukraine, the heroic and often effective resistance of Ukrainians to Russian aggression gave the USA the opportunity, with the hands of Ukrainians, if not to destroy their main potential enemy, then significantly weaken it to such an extent that Russia will no longer have such a big influence on the international arena as it did before. By helping Ukraine, the USA spends only material resources, while saving the lives of their soldiers, since the USA is not yet involved in a direct military contract with Russia. At the same time, the effectiveness of American weapons on the battlefield in Ukraine and, accordingly, the weak effectiveness of Russian weapons, led to the fact that third countries refuse to purchase weapons from Russia and buy them from NATO countries. And this, in turn, led to a sharp increase in the military-industrial complex, an increase in jobs, and so on.

The only thing that the USA still fears is the loss of control over nuclear weapons in the event of the collapse of the Russian Federation. Therefore, the US is not yet providing Ukraine with weapons in the required quantities and assortment, which can lead to a quick victory for Ukraine on the battlefield. But all these red lines are in motion and changing, which was demonstrated by the successful invasion of the Ukrainian Armed Forces into the Kursk region of the Russian Federation and the Kremlin's realization that this is for a long time, and also showed the world the far-fetched greatness of Russia.

On the other hand, the US cannot allow Russia to win the war against Ukraine. This would simultaneously mean the defeat of the US and its allies in the international arena, and the defeat of the US military doctrine, and a departure from the values it advertises, and the need for further military confrontation with Russia after it licks its mortal wounds and gets stronger. The only question is in what format this defeat will be recorded. And Ukraine has already proven that it is a good combat shield for NATO from Russian aggression.

Also, if the US allows Russia to win, this will significantly strengthen the positions of China, Iran, North Korea and the Russian Federation, their military and economic alliances and launch a new round of deadly wars on the planet.

Please where does the info come from. Plus post income gross and outflow US Government 2020 to 2024.

War in this day and age with the existence of nuclear weapons that can wipe out both US and China at the same time does not mean "direct armed conflict" any more.

You should look into a mirror once in a while.

Where do you get the insider info from?
Please post income gross and outflow US Government 2020 to 2024.
So we could draw our own conclusions.

Only because the US sees China as a thread is not a declaration of war.

You are seeing things from a very narrow perspective since all your focus is on Ukraine and Ukraine alone.

If you expand your view, you can see things better.
US regime is already spread too thin around the world. They can not sustain this situation for long specially since they are hemorrhaging money, in trillions. They need to reduce their costs at some point and that means abandoning some of the wars they are participating in specially when the problems pile on back home.
Also since according to all the National Security thing they release, China is on top of the lists of countries US has to declare war on, they will shift all their focus to East Asia sooner or later.

Remember that the conflict in Ukraine has been helping China grow which is not something the US regime wants. The Chinese have not only increased their economic relations with Russia (lots of money in it) they've also started receiving a lot more cheap Russian gas since the European markets were lost to Russia. On top of that the deindustrialization of Europe has also helped China grow significantly as the capital flees Europe.

So THIS is what the US regime cares about not what territory Russia annexed in Ukraine!
This also means the only difference the winner of the upcoming election in US would make is the approach and radicalism. As I pointed out in OP as well.

Since this opinion was expressed, that is, since mid-July, there have been significant changes in the US presidential election campaign: Biden refused to run again for this post on July 21, and US Vice President Kamala Harris became an official participant instead. Since then, Trump has lost a lot of popularity and Harris is now leading in most states. This is very unpleasant news for Russia, which hoped to weaken support for Ukraine with Trump's help to protect it from Russian occupiers.

Therefore, the Kremlin's hope for freezing the war, recognizing the occupied territories of Ukraine for Russia and easing sanctions is unlikely to happen. And in the issue of the war and its end, Ukraine will always have the last word, even if Trump becomes US president again. In addition, if the borders along the front line are frozen, will the Kremlin agree to lose part of the Kursk region, which has already been "liberated" by Ukraine? A very interesting question.

China And The Weasel Doctrine

China seems to be feeling the threat I explained here more every day and they are doing what has worked in the past which is a "weasel like" strategy. This has been the Chinese strategy for a very long time. It was the most palpable during the US-USSR Cold War, as they worked like a weasel between two sides and played both sides for maximum benefits. They built their nukes, they built their economy and generally got stronger specially by "milking" United States.

Once again Chinse government seems to think there is a war between US (NATO) and Russia and is using the same strategy. Play with both sides to maximize benefits. Tryin to milk both sides to get stronger.
This is probably why China has been dragging feet on Power of Siberia pipeline and other economic relations they have with Russia. It is as if they are once again putting pressure on Russia to get better deals (while doing the same with the NATO side as well).

But the problem this time is that US regime's main war is not with Russia, it is instead with China! They may be fighting a proxy war with the Russians right now but their focus is still on China. Something that will get worse with Trump and  seems to be understanding this more every day.
This is why all of a sudden Xi Jinping is picking up the phone after 2 years to communicate with the English PM Starmer (they've changed 4 PMs since the Ukraine war began! Talk about political instability, eh) and talks about "long-term and strategic view" the two countries should have. And he makes similar contacts with the French and the Germans. Remember in OP I said this time US is trying to get the Europeans on board? That is what Xi Jinping is trying to negate...

Things are definitely getting weird in the world as the coalitions keep "shuffling".

Russia is responding as well. This is why the Indian PM Modi is visiting Russia and the two countries get closer and while on the front it is all peace talks in the media, it runs deeper than that. It is the same "strategic view" that Xi Jinping is trying to build elsewhere.

---

Will the "weasel doctrine" work this time?
The chances are too low because as I said US regime's enemy number one is China so they can't just keep hiding in the shadows and on the side line feeding on conflicts elsewhere.
Europe is unlikely to save them as well. They're dealing with too many problems with their far rights and if Trump loses they lose the main incentive to work with China as well since this is all because of their fear of Trumps anti-EU and NATO policies.

At some point China has to make a more solid stance, instead of putting pressure on one side (eg. preventing BRICS currency).

---

BTW the US regime is hitting Chinese projects harder these days. Specifically the Belt and Road thing. Proving once again that their enemy number one is China and it is an economic war.
For example as the one of the branches of that corridor that goes through Pakistan and Iran is growing, in the past week the US proxies are carrying out terrorist attacks in the regions inside these two countries. The Jaish ul-Adl terrorists are hitting Iran as the BLA terrorists are hitting Pakistan.

Who said Trump or the US regime in general is smart?!

You see, some fundamental strategies don't change based on who is in the office. Check out the the National Security Strategy that the Whitehouse releases or the Annual Threat Assessment that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (dni.gov) publishes. They are always the same.

In this case, basically the US regime has always seen any nation that is growing in strength (economical or otherwise) as a threat. To normal people and normal countries, that makes no sense and it is stupid. But that is how United States has always worked.
They see Chinese economy growing faster and is currently stronger than the US economy so the regime sees it as a threat and says they have to "destroy China" because of it!

Now with different presidents, the strategies and the radicalism may change but not the main attitude. As I said for example Trump started the Tariff War and Biden continued it. You see, there is no change. The only difference was that Trump did it more radically.

I believe that with Trump we may actually get something more calm, feels like he isn't type of person who would run into war, and while a lot of people think that he wants war, he wants total control in the USA as his first order of business, not war.

Having a war within is a lot more important for him, and it feels like adding Russia or China to that wouldn't be smart. Think about it, if he goes into an economical war against China, that would cause a lot of prices to go up, since a lot of stuff comes from China, and that means people will be paying more, so inflation would go up, and someone who wants to rule a nation until they die, it is not a smart move to make inflation go up. That is why I believe that we are going to end up with a lot of unlikely results here.

War is the last thing on his mind, and high inflation is something he will try very hard to avoid. What he will focus on is to make sure he rigs elections as much as he possibly could, and fill the courts even further, and maybe even make SC filled with even more republicans if anyone retires or dies, so that's a big deal. I think it is going to be very important to get that power, otherwise if he loses, it will be very tough for rest of his life.

Present the link where those weapons a seen. Otherwise it is just fake info,

I don't care what US or Russian officials say. The said weapons have been seen elsewhere, which is my facts.
It's irrelevant here though because it doesn't change anything else I said about the subject of this topic.

Russia deliberately spreads false information that Ukraine sells weapons on the black market that are supplied to it by European countries and the United States. This is being done to ensure that weapons are not transferred to Ukraine to defend against a Russian attack, or at least to reduce the assistance provided. Thus, the former head of the Russian Ministry of Defense, Shoigu, without providing any evidence, stated that weapons from Ukraine end up on the black market and are distributed in Western Asian countries.

Earlier, Pentagon Speaker Patrick Ryder noted that the United States does not have any reliable information that Ukraine is reselling Western weapons. The US Department of Defense has repeatedly stated that it sees no signs that Western weapons are being misused: “We do not track weapons. We know that the Ukrainians are using the weapons we provided to them, and we have seen no indication that these weapons have gone anywhere other than to fight the Russians."

EU Foreign and Security Policy Speaker Peter Stano noted back in July 2022 that information about Ukraine’s alleged resale of Western weapons is Russian propaganda. According to him, Russia is waging a disinformation campaign against Ukraine, the EU and NATO to justify its crimes, mislead people around the world and manipulate facts.

Previously, disinformation was also spread about the alleged smuggling of weapons from Ukraine to Finland. However, in response to the Ukrainian embassy in Helsinki, the Finnish police reported that they did not have confirmed information about the supply of smuggled weapons from Ukraine.

Russian media massively disseminated fake news that users from Ukraine are reselling weapons on the darknet. BBC journalists investigated and found that the advertisements were false.
https://voxukraine.org/ru/bezosnovatelno-zapadnoe-oruzhye-yz-ukrayny-popadaet-v-terrorystycheskye-organyzatsyy

If you have facts that Ukraine sells Western weapons supplied to it on the black market, bring them and we’ll discuss it.

A lot of others advertising Trump have been saying this exact thing as well because in this campaign when the opponent (Democrats) are saying they'll help Ukraine and Trump won't, the Republicans have to do something about it and say they'll help but in a different way.

Obviously this is not likely for a couple of reasons.

For starters US doesn't have "ultra-modern weapons". They only have Ultra-Expensive weapons that are less shitty than what they're giving Ukraine. Unfortunately those won't change the outcome of this war either. Ukraine suffers from both manpower and firepower and US can not fix either one.
Besides, certain things will never be given to Ukraine considering how a large number of those weapons are being sold on blackmarkets... So when you say "weapons nobody has received aboard" there's a reason for that (they don't want it to fall into the hands of the adversaries). If they send those to Ukraine, in a short time they will

Secondly Trump's stance has always been the same. Both in his first term and now. He is all about that America first nonsense and in this context it means not giving more weapons to others including Ukraine. What he has done and will do is to force others like Europeans to give more weapons to Ukraine and we already know that they can't give any more than this either!

He also wants to focus on China, not Russia. Considering United States (not just Trump) doesn't care at all about Ukraine, they'd rather see it end and start the war with China than see it continue AND start a secondary war (with China). They can't fight a multi-theatre war. Escalating more with Russia would push China into invading Taiwan and open that new theatre.

It is foolish to hope that the United States and Europe will lift sanctions from Russia after they saw that the war in Ukraine has greatly weakened the Russian economy and there is a good opportunity to put the squeeze on the aggressor and throw him out of the list of influential world powers.

Putin can hardly count on Trump either. American politician and head of the district branch of the Republican Party for the 45th district of the New York State Assembly Boris Pincus said on the Kiev24 channel that, according to available information, Trump may offer Putin to leave the occupied territories of Ukraine in a specific short period of time. Otherwise, he “will simply say that he will be forced to give... ultra-modern types of weapons that no one has ever received abroad, but Ukraine will receive in unlimited quantities so that it can simply forcefully throw these barbarians out of the borders of 1991.” “This will be Trump’s plan,” the politician emphasized.
https://www.unian.net/war/voyna-v-ukraine-kakoy-ultimatum-putinu-svetit-ot-trampa-12710139.html

And the chances that Trump will return to the presidency are falling after Biden’s decision not to run for president for the next term. Now the likely Democratic candidate in this election, current US Vice President Kamala Harris, is confidently gaining support and information is already emerging that she is ahead of Trump in terms of support from US voters and influential individuals. But if Kamala Harris becomes the next president of the United States, then Putin’s Russia will clearly not be happy with regard to the war of aggression in Ukraine.

I allowed myself to set the entire sentence into the quote to take the polemic out and make it a debate.
If you ever have past through a Conspiracy based debate you'd know that they don't use facts.

China's biggest strength is its biggest weakness as well

I was looking at some stats and I realized that the economic growth that China has been reporting (~5% GDP growth) is mostly based on their exports not domestic economy expanding. In other words the demand for Chinese goods by Chinese people isn't really increasing.

OP is mainly about what others do and the effects on them. But on the side of China, I see two major issues as well.

First is that since their economic growth now mainly depends on exports, a tariff war could seriously restrain it and that could have significant effects on inflation in China itself.
To counter that it seems like the Chinese government is responding by trying to switch trade partners and export destinations. How much that would work depends on how many countries are going to join in the tariff war against China. It also cannot be predicted right now because a lot of the countries that we know are going to participate in that war are increasing their imports from China because their businessmen know what's coming so they are trying to import as much as they can before tariffs go up!
So we have to wait and see what happens in the long run.

Second is that China is also going to retaliate against that war. They'll do that by imposing their own tariffs on goods they buy from those countries. For example China is the biggest meat importer and they buy a lot of it from Europe and one of the tariffs they usually increase is on meat from there.
That means pretty much the same thing I said in OP: inflation in China and like always it's just the regular people would be hurt...

---

In other words you had no logical arguments for or against the subject.

So does the image in the opener post.

The tittle is US-China economy war + radical Trump = higher inflation + interest rates + war
Most conspiracy fans take data from where its most convenient to strengthen their theories.
Their thought process makes them fall easier for fake info.

Well it's been about the American Dream, the Land of Opportunity and all that. That requires a healthy economy as well, an economy where the middle class can work normal amount and get paid enough to have a normal life instead of working their asses off and be up to their necks in debt because the US economy has turned from a production based economy into a debt based economy and finally into what it is today, a Ponzi scheme.

To do that and actually Make America Great they need to start the factories again, to start production, to help the middle class. This is not about some internal politics, and it's not a Trump thing either (he is just more radical about it). They've all been trying to do this and failing because Capitalism and Liberalism ruined America a long time ago. Everything is for maximum profit and to maximize profit you cannot produce anything inside America.

They always try the craziest solutions as well. I already mentioned the tariff wars, another thing is the child labor laws which they've been silently loosening and we may not be that far from seeing American sweatshops with child workers.
Here's another food for thought: Have you ever wondered why unlike majority of the world in the 21st century, American women are being paid less than men?!!

These two will definitely make a lot of things a lot more complicated and I wouldn't be surprised to see a lot more wars if he wins.

it could be true that the peace agreement between Saudi and Iran doesn't involve Yemen. while the Houtis are busy fighting IDF, Saudi is also busy disrupting the Yemenis. somehow the House of Saud just can't be trusted to stay put. if all hell breaks lose, Iran could rain down armaments on this country.

Trump along with his vice supporting the war in the Middle East, will make the war worse, especially the Ukraine-Russia war. after all their political difference, his policy regarding war may still be no different from Biden's.

It is a tactic for anyone who would like to destroy democracy, because it has been proven to work. If you make people quite hungry, like really poor, poorer than they ever been, they will look for a leader to save them, meaning that they will not see President position as someone who is their worker, because it's a public position and you appoint him and then you could get rid of him if he does badly, but if he is a hero then you can't get rid of him, people will demand more and more from them and will see them as their saviour.

So, if you make radical changes like this, increase the inflation, cause trouble, then they will live a bad life, then you throw the reason to other side and say you could have done better if the other side didn't stop everything you do, then they will end up trusting you. This is what Trump is doing, ruining the nation, and telling the nation that democrats are ruining it, and there are a lot of republicans that believed it last time, not enough to get him reelected though, people didn't buy into his lies.

However, his luck is that Trump is racing against another candidate, who literally can't walk, easiest win of anyone's life ever I assume, hence why it looks like he will have another chance.