Pages:
Author

Topic: USA have found the cure of CANCER? - page 3. (Read 5901 times)

member
Activity: 132
Merit: 10
First Universal Cryptocurrency Casino
November 07, 2017, 10:05:09 AM
Such reports have already appeared repeatedly. Then it turned out that this is not true.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
BIG AIRDROP: t.me/otppaychat
November 07, 2017, 09:41:09 AM
I take this with a pinch of salt. What with the new magical cure suddenly announced and the US having such a huge debt. This drug seems to have no side effects at all ?
Great to hear that they already found a cure for cancer because lot of people are praying to have a cure for cancer that sometimes kill us ..
full member
Activity: 184
Merit: 100
November 07, 2017, 08:29:07 AM
come to Asia,and you will so many cure of cancer,it how about your point of view,so many country in asia claim have found cure of cancer,but it just their argue,world can't be believe with easy.
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
November 05, 2017, 01:44:40 PM
I think cancer is a business .. I once read a book, how new diseases emerge and created manifestly by humans.
If there is a medicine that can cure cancer, surely the price is very expensive.
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 259
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
October 10, 2017, 09:37:22 AM
There are a huge number of cancers. Some have cures, others do not. Some have medication that's in human trials. That's not the same as "the FDA actively supressing the cure".

The real issue with cancer is that when it is caught in it's early stages, then there may be a way to completely cure it. Most of the time people who died of cancer found out that they were not able to detect it at the early stages and that's the main causes of death.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
October 10, 2017, 08:53:01 AM
Cancer can take any forms but the basic idea we all need to understand is that it comes about as a result of gene division going haywire, meaning there are some genetic information that replicate and alter gene coding giving way to uncontrollable gene coding and mitosis. Until cure goes down into our genetic make up, basically the Uranine Guanine Thymine and cytosine and adenine it will be extremely difficult to develop any measures to completely fight gene mutation
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROTOCOL
October 10, 2017, 07:39:02 AM
#99
As scary as it may sound, many diseases that exist in this world now are created by the brilliant minds of our generation. They themselves create viruses that makes people sick, then create a cure, treatment or medicine and monopolize them to make money. Some scientists create diseases to kill one race as a way to solve over population. Some use it for military purposes.

Yes, companies are always trying to make money on human diseases and if they manage to cure cancer for big money, then they will create new diseases in order not to remain without profit.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
October 10, 2017, 02:09:02 AM
#98
                                                                                                                       DRUGS OF CURE CANCER EXIST MAYBE
Terminally, cancer patients have been “effectively cured” by a game-changing new class of drugs.
In one trial, more than half of patients who had just months to live saw deadly tumours shrink or completely disappear.

In recent days, the results of trials of a number of treatments which harness the body’s immune system have been announced at the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s annual conference in Chicago. They show promise in the fight against skin cancer and lung disease.
But results from a slew of trials released last night at the conference showed “spectacular” effects against a multitude of cancers.

Experts said the advances suggest terminally ill patients with common cancers – including lung, bowel, ovarian and womb – could in future be cured by the therapies.
The evidence in favour of the radical drugs is so overwhelming that they could save tens of thousands of lives in the UK within a decade, it is claimed.

Cancers develop because they manage to hide from the immune system and disguise the danger they pose. Immunotherapy works by making the cancer visible again and alerting the body’s immune system to the danger,” Prof Johnston said. Patients who began some of the earliest trials 10 years ago appeared to have been cured, he added.

USA is the best research center. in USA they have to researching on all type of daises. they try to finding now on cancer daises. may be they fonded. that's really very good news. if really they found medicine for cancer really it is good news who suffering from cancer.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
September 06, 2017, 09:42:33 PM
#97
Based on what I read about cancer, it says that they have found a cure to cancer long time ago, but they refuse to announce it or expose it to public. I do not know the reason of it and also I do not know if it is real or some opinion of other people.

Then the medical takes the known cures, and twists the information so that it seems like they are not cures at all. One example is Dr. Otto Warburg, a Nobel Prize winning doctor who discovered how oxygen therapy can cure cancer.

Because of what Dr. Warburg found, many people have successfully gone through oxygen therapies - including hydrogen peroxide injection, and ozone injection - that have completely cured their cancer.

Look at the clever, subtle way that the medical system downplays the things that Dr. Warburg discovered, in the following article. Then Google and Youtube search on any form of "Otto Warburg cancer" word combinations to see that the medical is right in their technical evaluation of Dr. Warburgs info, but that they are wrong in downplaying his discoveries rather than advancing them.

And in the event that the author of the, below, article is a sincere, non-medical cancer fighter, I apologize for any suggestion that I make to the reverse.




What Otto Warburg Actually Discovered About Cancer


Seldom does a week go by without articles, internet posts, and advertisements which maintain that Nobel Laureate Otto Warburg discovered that cancer was caused by low oxygen and acidic pH. Though often misreported, Dr. Otto Warburg did not win the Nobel Prize for finding that cancer cannot live in an oxygen rich or alkaline environment.

What Warburg discovered and what he was awarded a Nobel Prize for was for simply making the discovery that low oxygen was characteristic of cancer cells.

Otto Warburg made some groundbreaking discoveries about the mechanisms of cancer, especially as regards respiration and mitochondrial malfunction. Instead of the widely spread disinformation that Warburg discovered that lack of oxygen was the prime cause of cancer and that he discovered that oxygen was a cure for cancer, the truth may surprise you…


Read more at https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/otto-warburg-cancer/.


Cool
legendary
Activity: 3220
Merit: 1344
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
September 06, 2017, 09:11:29 PM
#96
The pharma cartels will not allow this new treatment method to be put online. Because cancer treatment is one of the main sources of income for the big pharma, although it is ineffective against third stage and terminal stage cancer. And the insurance industry also benefits a lot from this condition. Here in India, cancer treatment is not covered in most of the policies. So if the patient dies of cancer, it is a bonus for the insurance companies.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
September 06, 2017, 03:18:37 PM
#95
As scary as it may sound, many diseases that exist in this world now are created by the brilliant minds of our generation. They themselves create viruses that makes people sick, then create a cure, treatment or medicine and monopolize them to make money. Some scientists create diseases to kill one race as a way to solve over population. Some use it for military purposes.
jr. member
Activity: 52
Merit: 10
September 06, 2017, 10:12:23 AM
#94
The future of cancer treatment is in monoclonal antibodies, which help allow the immune system to kill cancer cells. Very promising new research coming out.
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
September 06, 2017, 10:07:38 AM
#93
                                                                                                                       DRUGS OF CURE CANCER EXIST MAYBE
Terminally, cancer patients have been “effectively cured” by a game-changing new class of drugs.
In one trial, more than half of patients who had just months to live saw deadly tumours shrink or completely disappear.

In recent days, the results of trials of a number of treatments which harness the body’s immune system have been announced at the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s annual conference in Chicago. They show promise in the fight against skin cancer and lung disease.
But results from a slew of trials released last night at the conference showed “spectacular” effects against a multitude of cancers.

Experts said the advances suggest terminally ill patients with common cancers – including lung, bowel, ovarian and womb – could in future be cured by the therapies.
The evidence in favour of the radical drugs is so overwhelming that they could save tens of thousands of lives in the UK within a decade, it is claimed.

Cancers develop because they manage to hide from the immune system and disguise the danger they pose. Immunotherapy works by making the cancer visible again and alerting the body’s immune system to the danger,” Prof Johnston said. Patients who began some of the earliest trials 10 years ago appeared to have been cured, he added.

If you listen to the audio of one of the high ranking person in Illuminati who quit in their organization and spread their secret, one of these is about Cancer, that they have a cure ever since, they just don't want it to know or maybe only the richest man or Strong person knows about it and they are the only one who can used it.
full member
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
September 06, 2017, 08:33:33 AM
#92
I think that it is not profitable for them to invent a really effective medicine against cancer, because the pharmaceutical company will lose a lot of money that it lets on cancer relief.
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 100
September 06, 2017, 07:17:51 AM
#91
Based on what I read about cancer, it says that they have found a cure to cancer long time ago, but they refuse to announce it or expose it to public. I do not know the reason of it and also I do not know if it is real or some opinion of other people.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
September 05, 2017, 01:32:41 PM
#90
The interesting thing is the human component in poor countries.

In poor countries, the natives are often so poor that there is no "gloss" to distract the health care workers. Besides, health care people are working in these poor places because they have the goal of helping people.

Contrast that with the USA doctor who has a $million dollar mansion that he has to support. When he is not at work, he is living in luxury. To keep that luxury, he needs to make his money.

Doctors and nurses helping in a poor country, have often turned their backs on wealth so that they can help people. They empathize with the poor people.

The point? Doctors in other countries aren't going to be as careful to keep a cure secret for the sake of money. They might do it if they are threatened with job loss. But even then, they use the "secret" to cure people. The just don't advertise it. So, they feel that non-advertising is made right by the usage of it among the poor people.

Cool
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
September 05, 2017, 01:15:16 PM
#89
In the event that this is valid, at that point a straightforward lion's share of the pharmaceutical organizations (i.e cartels) will go bankrupt. The malignancy treatment industry (drugs, pankillers, chemotherapy, radiation therapy.etc) is worth trillions of USD, and the quantity of disease patients is by all accounts expanding each year. In the event that some enchantment tranquilize is found, it will spell the fate of the pharma business.

Better believe it they find the cure and its medicalbbreakthrough in therapeutic world however i dont think they are prepared to realese it because on the off chance that they discharge it they cannot accumulate cash to the patients. I figure they should discharge if the procedure is fruitful so malignancy will reparable and numerous life will be spare and innocents child will mitigate and be sound once more
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
September 05, 2017, 01:05:04 PM
#88
A $475,000 And A $5 Cancer Cure Announced In The Same Week





I'm sure readers want to hear about the five-dollar cancer cure first.  A university-based team set out to develop a cancer cure that could be performed in third-world countries where incomes are low, equipment unavailable and even electricity non-existent.  What they came up with needs just a needle and a syringe and a steady hand.

It is called tumor ablation — the injection of ethanol (alcohol) directly into a solid tumor that causes tumor cells to dehydrate and die.  It has been successfully demonstrated in pancreatic, parathyroid, liver, adrenal and other tumors.  It requires no special equipment and was 100% effective at curing cancers in hamsters in the animal lab.  Its only drawback, escape of ethanol into surrounding healthy tissues, has been overcome by making an ethyl cellulose substance that is highly viscous and remains in place rather than spreading to healthy tissues.

Only a 3% ethyl cellulose concentration injected at a certain rate was determined to produce optimal effect.  The results were astounding.  Using conventional ethanol ablation, 4 of 12 tumors regressed completely by the 7th day following treatment. The formed gel of ethanol cellulose reduced tumor volume to 13% versus 89% of their initial size with standard ethanol instillation.  Eight days following injection 7 of 7 tumors had completely regressed with ethanol cellulose gel whereas 0 of 5 regressed completely with standard ethanol.

Ethyl cellulose is currently approved by the US FDA as a food additive and costs less than 50-cents a gram.  Injection of 16-times less medicine (ethanol cellulose) versus plain ethanol completely abolished cancer.  Curious readers can view the astounding visual images of these complete cures published in a recent edition of Scientific Reports.

A commentator at the American Council on Science & Health website says "any technological advances that result from the team's research will have applicability not only in the development world but to the develop one, as well."  Will we ever see the day when this treatment is applied en mass?  Of course, major news sources buried the five-dollar cancer cure and extolled the half-million dollar one.

Meanwhile, the FDA has approved the first immunotherapy drug for childhood leukemia.  The treatment involves the drug Kymriah and will be confined to cases of unremitting acute lymphoblastic leukemia.  Kymriah, called the first "living drug," genetically alters immune cells (T-cells) to fight the disease. About 600 patients develop this form of leukemia annually.  It can also be used for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma.  It mobilizes the body's own immune system.

I've already explained how to mimic this T-cell therapy at a pittance of the cost of Kymriah.  The use of supplemental zinc to restore volume and function to the thymus gland that shrinks with advancing age is an overlooked form of immunotherapy.  Thymus gland extract, available in health shops, is also available.  It would cost less than $100 to purchase zinc and other vitamins to rejuvenate the immune system.

Expensive as it is, how can anyone be any less than thrilled to hear of this cure.  However, T-cell therapy with Kymriah isn't a complete cure for all.  It has an 83% remission rate.  It is likely to be more effective if the function of the thymus gland were restored.

What is needed are free markets in medicine

Someone once said the objective of American business is to do things "more, better and faster" than your competitors.  That was certainly true when it came to transistor radios, computer printers, handwriting instruments, and a plethora of other products and services.  But that isn't the objective of American medicine.


Read more at https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/09/bill-sardi/two-cancer-cures-announced-week/.


Cool
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
May 25, 2016, 02:21:10 PM
#87
Big Pharma's medical research papers are total bunk... hundreds were fraudulently ghostwritten by a P.R. firm called 'DesignWrite'.





Even though the big revelations about Big Pharma's science paper research fraud came out years ago, most people are still not aware of this. Here's the scoop: Drug companies routinely pay P.R. firms to ghostwrite clinical science papers which are published in medical journals and forwarded to the FDA to "prove" the drugs are safe and effective. But it's all a farce: The papers are pure fiction, dreamed up by what are essentially marketing firms for the sole purpose of getting drugs approved even when they don't work.

"In 2009, around fourteen thousand women who developed breast cancer while taking Prempro, a hormone replacement therapy (HRT), sued the drug's manufacturer, Wyeth," wrote Rupert Sheldrake in an extraordinary book called Science Set Free.

In court, it turned out that many of the medical research papers supporting HRT had been ghostwritten by a commercial medical communications company called DesignWrite, whose website boasted that over twelve years they had "planned, created and/or managed hundreds of advisory boards, a thousand abstracts and posters, 500 clinical papers, over 10,000 speakers' bureau programmes, over 200 satellite symposia, 60 international programmes, dozens of websites, and a broad array of ancillary printed and electronic materials." It emerged that DesignWrite organized a "planned publication programme" for Prempro, consisting of review articles, case reports, editorials and commentaries, using the medical literature as a marketing tool.

As Ben Goldacre reported in the Guardian: DesignWrite wrote the first drafts and sent them to Wyeth, who advised on the creation of a second draft. Only then was the paper sent to the academic who would appear as the "author" … Design Write sold Wyeth more than 50 peer-reviewed journal articles for HRT, and a similar number of conference posters, slide kits, symposia, and journal supplements. Adrienne Fugh-Berman (an associate professor of physiology at Georgetown University) found that these publications variously promoted unproven and unlicensed benefits of Wyeth's HRT drug, undermined its competitors, and downplayed its harms … [A]cademic journal publications are not regarded as promotional activity, so all this was legal. Worst of all was the complicity of the academics… "Research shows high clinician reliance on journal articles for credible product information," said Design Write. They're right: when you read an academic paper, you trust it was written by the person whose name is on it.
 

Wyeth was only caught after its toxic HRT drugs started causing a wave of cancer among women

This nefarious activity was uncovered by PLoS Medicine, an open source medical journal that has a history of being far more transparent than the usual pharma-corrupted journals like BMJ and The Lancet. As PLoS reported:

…the documents illustrate how Wyeth Pharmaceuticals contracted with DesignWrite, a medical communications company, to write articles for top-tier medical journals with the intention of bolstering the sales of the Premarin family of hormone replacement products. After the articles were written, DesignWrite solicited prominent health professionals to appear as "authors."

As all this was unfolding, Sen. Charles Grassley launched an investigation into the fraudulent practices of Big Pharma. As reported by LegalExaminer.com:

Wyeth, [a] pharmaceutical company, is accused of hiring ghostwriters to produce medical journal articles favoring its hormone replacement therapy (HRT) Prempro, according to Congressional letters seeking more information about the company's involvement in medical ghostwriting.

Mr. Grassley's staff released several of internal corporate documents gathered from lawsuits that show the central, previously undisclosed role of Wyeth and DesignWrite in creating articles promoting hormone therapy for menopausal women as far back as 1997.

The documents also show Wyeth executives came up with ideas for medical journal articles, titled them, drafted outlines, paid writers to draft manuscripts, recruited academic authors and picked publications to run the articles – all while failing to disclose the companies' role to journal readers and editors.

This was all part of the Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) drug scam, when tens of millions of women were told they should be taking HRT drugs. In reality, those drugs caused huge spikes in breast cancer, generating a wave of new profits for the cancer industry.
 

Big Pharma's business model is based on CAUSING the diseases that bring in repeat business

See how this works? Big Pharma invents a drug that causes cancer, then hires a bunch of fraudulent P.R. firm scientists to slap together a series of fictional science papers, then the FDA approves the drug and doctors start pushing it. The drug companies bribe the doctors with free vacations to Hawaii, then prescriptions skyrocket, earning billions for the pharma giants. As the cancer rates start to skyrocket, the cancer industry cashes in on all the cancer surgery, radiation and chemotherapy profits.


Read more at http://www.naturalnews.com/054141_Big_Pharma_research_fraud_ghost_writing_science_papers.html.


Cool
full member
Activity: 123
Merit: 100
March 23, 2016, 02:13:37 PM
#86
There is already an answer for cancer cure. The only problem is that the medical science does not want to adopt it because cancer is a billion dollar business. With cancer around, doctors and the pharmaceuticals make good money out of it. So why will they eliminate cancer?
Pages:
Jump to: