Thanks for your comment. This is the most well organized and reasonable answer so far. You have made a very good point about inverstment: whether it will be profitable. I think most comments here are too much focused on the high returns rather than high risks. I am open to any investment but without calculating riks, nothing would seem meaningful.
When we deal with investments, the step that needs to be considered is risk, even though all existing forms of investment have different levels of risk, while the return is the result of the investment we make, if we have set measurable standards and qualifications. Investments will proceed according to the steps and strategies set, if you understand the efficiency level of utilization. Mistakes in investing will also be fatal, if the risk is not minimized with the appropriate level of accuracy.
Speaking of depoists, they cons are pretty much what you described but have you ever considered the sense of security/steady income is more important than profits in this situation ? In my country, even the local banks are broke, deposits below $80,000 shall be insured and indeemed by the central bank immediately. I guess most people just ignore the psychological benefit in this case. Material possessions vary from person to person and there is no universal standard.
You know better the standard of using money, psychologically we have learned two things in placing the money we have?
1. Investments
Qualifications for investment also can't be ignored in the long term and short term, when considering the fixed income and overall profit in the investment journey, if you can take two parts at the same time it is even more profitable, you can use fixed income for short-term investment, meaning when you get profit, then you can withdraw some and try to add another half in investment, if you do this repeatedly, then you will also get stable income.
2. Deposits
A model like this will not be able to maintain the value of the currency, the profit you get is also a little according to the standard set by the bank, assume you save $ 80,000, then how much profit will the bank give you, then try to calculate the investment in Bitcoin with the same capital. When you have done these two standards, the answers to the choices you take will be easy to determine.
If the consideration of insurance guarantees, the correlation of bitcoin investment will never be relevant and in line with our understanding, it also returns to people's readiness to take steps to start investing and in my opinion, almost many investment models do not have insurance guarantees.
I also agree with placing something wiser cause we don't know what the future holds and we are esay to be slaved by materials if we think other people look up to us just based on what we have. Actually nobody cares.
We are valued not based on how much money we have, when someone has found a way of peace, then something valuable is no longer a problem, but in essence humans need money but not how much they have, because if we talk about this problem , then it will lead to a sensitive and relative meaning. That's why money must be used wisely and on target.