Using Intel CPU and Motherboard ? Your Bitcoins may be in actual danger. - page 2.

rikfredsy

sr. member

Activity: 256

Merit: 250

Quote from: ShadowOfHarbringer on January 09, 2015, 05:41:25 PM

Quote from: BillyBobZorton on January 09, 2015, 02:29:04 PM

So Intel = Skynet?

Intel = NSANet

Quote from: rikfredsy on January 09, 2015, 12:30:25 PM

Waaaw this is really interest information i heard 2015 . i didn't think that technology is so so developped like this
Intel core 2 duo E6750 is this safe for old CPU like mine ? or almost intel CPU > 2005 NOT safe ?

Intel CPUs/MBs older than 2011 are probably completely safe.

However, the worst part is - we cannot actually be sure. Intel has hard-wired code in all motherboards supporting their CPUs and nobody knows what the code is or what it does. It is completely encypted and has strong DRM.

This is not the work of an honest company. This is an obviously evil plot.

Thanks
Great informations where did you get them please i love this kind off informations

ShadowOfHarbringer

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1006

Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952

Quote from: BillyBobZorton on January 09, 2015, 02:29:04 PM

So Intel = Skynet?

Intel = NSANet

Quote from: rikfredsy on January 09, 2015, 12:30:25 PM

Waaaw this is really interest information i heard 2015 . i didn't think that technology is so so developped like this
Intel core 2 duo E6750 is this safe for old CPU like mine ? or almost intel CPU > 2005 NOT safe ?

Intel CPUs/MBs older than 2011 are probably completely safe.

However, the worst part is - we cannot actually be sure. Intel has hard-wired code in all motherboards supporting their CPUs and nobody knows what the code is or what it does. It is completely encypted and has strong DRM.

This is not the work of an honest company. This is an obviously evil plot.

ALToids

hero member

Activity: 519

Merit: 500

I feel much safer buyer CPUs from Russia so Putin can steal my BTC:

http://www.futurelooks.com/russian-government-says-america-fine-well-make-cpu-arm-linux/

rikfredsy

sr. member

Activity: 256

Merit: 250

Quote from: BillyBobZorton on January 09, 2015, 02:29:04 PM

So Intel = Skynet?

High system for spying on everyone but this is not a danger if someone is normal theirs nothing to hide

BillyBobZorton

legendary

Activity: 1204

Merit: 1028

So Intel = Skynet?

rikfredsy

sr. member

Activity: 256

Merit: 250

Waaaw this is really interest information i heard 2015 . i didn't think that technology is so so developped like this

Intel core 2 duo E6750 is this safe for old CPU like mine ? or almost intel CPU > 2005 NOT safe ?

Lethn

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1000

<<< smug AMD user Grin

elliwilli

sr. member

Activity: 307

Merit: 250

et rich or die tryi

Damn thats spooky.
I should be safe though. i use a Atheros Ethernet card so im safe (ish)

siameze

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

Quote from: siameze on January 07, 2015, 08:54:25 PM

Quote from: Lauda on January 07, 2015, 03:40:32 PM

So what is your suggestion then? Should i build my own CPU from my own transistors and mine the silicon myself? Cheesy

Probably. You may have difficulties sourcing silicon from outside of the reach of the US and NSA. I'm sure they have already hidden exploits in domestic silicon.

Quote from: bitspill

They said they were going to mine the silicon themselves, how does the gov't have hidden exploits in a metal? Maybe it's in the gold/silver used in cabling also

Quote from: LaudaM

Maybe the whole planet was infected by malware on a molecular level. There was probably some discovery on how to manipulate molecules, but kept quiet.
I will have to source my silicon off of the planet.

See? Now LaudaM may be our only hope. They have even fooled the citizenry into believing it is impossible to manipulate objects on a molecular level.

Christian1998

sr. member

Activity: 474

Merit: 500

Quote

What do you mean by Intel motherboards? Motherboards that have Intel sockets?

I think he means mainboard which were produced by Intel and for example not by Asus, Asrock or any other.

Sorry for my bad english Wink

Best regards
Christian

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: ShadowOfHarbringer on January 07, 2015, 04:42:48 PM

Quote from: Lauda on January 07, 2015, 03:40:32 PM

So what is your suggestion then? Should i build my own CPU from my own transistors and mine the silicon myself? Cheesy

I don't know what you should do, but I am surely stopping buying anything from Intel.
Too bad I already bought 2 intel motherboards lately. Well, it would be a big waste of money and time to sell them and buy new ones, so i will be installing non-intel network cards on these while leaving the built-ins unused - that will at least protect me from remote hack.

Still, i need to be careful when downloading *.exe files from internet, because any of them could be a rootkit. Lucky for me, I don't use Windows too much (maybe just for selected games), so that is not a big problem.

What do you mean by Intel motherboards? Motherboards that have Intel sockets?

Quote from: bitspill on January 08, 2015, 12:20:53 AM

Quote from: siameze on January 07, 2015, 08:54:25 PM

Quote from: Lauda on January 07, 2015, 03:40:32 PM

So what is your suggestion then? Should i build my own CPU from my own transistors and mine the silicon myself? Cheesy

Probably. You may have difficulties sourcing silicon from outside of the reach of the US and NSA. I'm sure they have already hidden exploits in domestic silicon.

They said they were going to mine the silicon themselves, how does the gov't have hidden exploits in a metal? Maybe it's in the gold/silver used in cabling also

Maybe the whole planet was infected by malware on a molecular level. There was probably some discovery on how to manipulate molecules, but kept quiet.
I will have to source my silicon off of the planet.

Balthazar

legendary

Activity: 3108

Merit: 1359

http://cubieboard.org/2015/01/04/cubieboard4cc-a80-in-factory/

bitspill

legendary

Activity: 2087

Merit: 1015

Quote from: siameze on January 07, 2015, 08:54:25 PM

Quote from: Lauda on January 07, 2015, 03:40:32 PM

So what is your suggestion then? Should i build my own CPU from my own transistors and mine the silicon myself? Cheesy

Probably. You may have difficulties sourcing silicon from outside of the reach of the US and NSA. I'm sure they have already hidden exploits in domestic silicon.

They said they were going to mine the silicon themselves, how does the gov't have hidden exploits in a metal? Maybe it's in the gold/silver used in cabling also

siameze

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Lauda on January 07, 2015, 03:40:32 PM

So what is your suggestion then? Should i build my own CPU from my own transistors and mine the silicon myself? Cheesy

Probably. You may have difficulties sourcing silicon from outside of the reach of the US and NSA. I'm sure they have already hidden exploits in domestic silicon.

Prelude

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1000

Quote from: criptix on January 07, 2015, 05:51:24 PM

Quote from: ShadowOfHarbringer on January 06, 2015, 06:29:55 AM

Quote from: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/active-management-technology

For remote access, a cooperating network interface is required: Intel ethernet adapters, Intel WiFi adapters, and certain 3G modems are supported. If you can, replace Intel-made network interfaces with ones made by a different manufacturer, that do not support AMT.

Apparently for the remote control to work, you also need to have Intel network card, so not using any Intel network hardware should keep you safe from remote attack.

do you know the reason why it has to be an pci intel network card?
most motherboards are already coming with onboard lan, shouldnt that be the same?

High end motherboards usually come equipped with Intel NICs since they're the best, performance wise. If it isn't Intel you're fine I imagine.

Wish I wouldn't have upgraded to X99.

criptix

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1145

Quote from: ShadowOfHarbringer on January 06, 2015, 06:29:55 AM

Quote from: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/active-management-technology

For remote access, a cooperating network interface is required: Intel ethernet adapters, Intel WiFi adapters, and certain 3G modems are supported. If you can, replace Intel-made network interfaces with ones made by a different manufacturer, that do not support AMT.

Apparently for the remote control to work, you also need to have Intel network card, so not using any Intel network hardware should keep you safe from remote attack.

do you know the reason why it has to be an pci intel network card?
most motherboards are already coming with onboard lan, shouldnt that be the same?

ShadowOfHarbringer

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1006

Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952

Quote from: Lauda on January 07, 2015, 03:40:32 PM

So what is your suggestion then? Should i build my own CPU from my own transistors and mine the silicon myself? Cheesy

I don't know what you should do, but I am surely stopping buying anything from Intel.

Too bad I already bought 2 intel motherboards lately. Well, it would be a big waste of money and time to sell them and buy new ones, so i will be installing non-intel network cards on these while leaving the built-ins unused - that will at least protect me from remote hack.

Still, i need to be careful when downloading *.exe files from internet, because any of them could be a rootkit. Lucky for me, I don't use Windows too much (maybe just for selected games), so that is not a big problem.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

So what is your suggestion then? Should i build my own CPU from my own transistors and mine the silicon myself? Cheesy

ShadowOfHarbringer

legendary

Activity: 1470

Merit: 1006

Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952

Quote from: Carlton Banks on January 07, 2015, 12:20:00 PM

Quote from: Lauda on January 07, 2015, 10:07:38 AM

This is all just fantasy. Until someone actually does it, I won't believe it.

Too late. Look at the AMT Wikipedia article from the OP, it's been demonstrated about 2011 I think (although the specific flaw that team discovered was patched in more recent chipsets).

Yep, AMT was already hacked once, but Intel quickly patched the hole.

But since we have no way of knowing what resides in that special, hidden, encrypted, DRMed software in Intel's AMT, anything could be in there. And you can be sure that NSA will put their nasty fingers in it sooner or later (if it hasn't already).

Intel has just created grounds for domination of permanently NSA-FBI-CIA-rootkited hardware on the market (since most M/B chips are Intel's anyway). And their backdoor is extremely sophiscticated, there is nothing else close to it on the consumer & server market.

Intel cannot be trusted anymore.

Prelude

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1000

Quote from: jbrnt on January 07, 2015, 12:52:37 PM

I didn't finish reading everything. Can I say I am safe if I use an Intel CPU, non-Intel motherboard and a non-Intel network card? I do not think Intel is after my bitcoin, only hackers are.

Your non Intel branded motherboard is using an Intel chipset, unless it's a dinosaur.

Topic: Using Intel CPU and Motherboard ? Your Bitcoins may be in actual danger. - page 2. (Read 5053 times)